California’s nurse-to-patient ratio law and occupational injury

  • J. Paul LeighEmail author
  • Carrie A. Markis
  • Ana-Maria Iosif
  • Patrick S. Romano
Original Article



To determine whether state-mandated minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in California hospitals had an effect on reported occupational injury and illness rates.


The difference-in-differences method was applied: The change in injury rates among hospital nurses after implementation of the law in California was compared to the change in 49 other states and the District of Columbia combined. Data were drawn from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and the California Employment Development Department, including numerator estimates of injury and illness cases and denominator estimates of the number of registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) employed in hospitals. Confidence intervals (CIs) for rates were constructed based on assumptions that favored the null hypothesis.


The most probable difference-in-differences estimate indicated that the California law was associated with 55.57 fewer occupational injuries and illnesses per 10,000 RNs per year, a value 31.6 % lower than the expected rate without the law. The most probable reduction for LPNs was 33.6 %. Analyses of CIs suggested that these reductions were unlikely to be due to chance.


Despite significant data restrictions and corresponding methodological limitations, the evidence suggests that the law was effective in reducing occupational injury and illness rates for both RNs and LPNs. Whether these 31.6 and 33.6 % reductions are maintained over time remains to be seen.


Legislation Job-related injury Illness Ratios 



This study was funded in part by Grants from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U54OH007550-11, Dr. Leigh) and the California Department of Public Health (Agreement 09-11543, Drs. Romano and Leigh).

Conflict of interest



  1. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Cimiotti JP et al (2010) Implications of the California nurse staffing mandate for other states. Health Serv Res 45(4):904–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Nurses Association (2013) Safe nurse staffing laws in state legislatures. Accessed 1 Feb 2013
  3. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin PC, Hux JE (2002) A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. J Vasc Surg 36(1):194–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barling J, Kelloway KE, Iverson RD (2003) High-quality work, job satisfaction, and occupational injuries. J Appl Psychol 88(2):276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton LB, Aydin CE, Donaldson N, Brown DS, Sandhu M, Friedman M, Aronow HU (2007) Mandated nurse staffing ratios in California: a comparison of staffing and nursing-sensitive outcomes pre- and post-regulation’. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 8(4):238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses. Accessed 15 April 2014
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) Chapter 9: Occupational safety and health statistics. Accessed 27 Feb 2013
  9. California Department of Health Services (2003) Final statement of reasons R-37-01, pp 1–42. Accessed 10 Sep 2014
  10. California Healthline (2011) Nurses group pursues stringent penalties for staffing violations. March 3, 2011. Accessed 11 May 2014
  11. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference, 2nd edn. Duxbury, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Charney W, Schirmer J (2007) Nursing injury rates and negative patient outcomes-connecting the dots. AAOHN J 55(11):470–475Google Scholar
  13. Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH (2002) Effects of hospital staffing and organizational climate on needlestick injuries to nurses. Am J Public Health 92(7):1115–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coffman JM, Seago JA, Spetz J (2002) Minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in acute care hospitals in California. Health Aff 21(5):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook A, Gaynor M, Stephens M Jr, Taylor L (2012) The effect of a hospital nurse staffing mandate on patient health outcomes: evidence from California’s minimum staffing regulation. J Health Econ 31:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson N, Shapiro S (2010) Impact of California mandate acute care hospital nurse staffing ratios: a literature synthesis. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 11(3):184–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donaldson N, Bolton LB, Aydin C, Brown D, Elashoff JD, Sandhu M (2005) Impact of California’s licensed nurse–patient ratios on unit-level nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 6(3):198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerdtz MF, Nelson S (2007) 5-20: a model of minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in Victoria, Australia. J Nurs Manag 15(1):64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jofre J (2008) New RN staffing regulations. January 11, 2008. Accessed 25 April 2014
  20. Lagerström M, Hansson T, Hagberg M (1998) Work-related low-back problems in nursing. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(6):449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leigh JP (2011) Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the US. Milbank Q 89(4):728–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leigh JP, Wiatrowski WJ, Gillen M et al (2008) Characteristics of persons and jobs with needlestick injuries in a national data set. Am J Infect Control 36(6):414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mark B, Harless DW, Spetz J (2009) California’s minimum nurse-staffing legislation and nurses’ wages. Health Aff 28(2):w326–w334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mark VA, Harless DW, Spetz J, Reiter KL, Pink GH (2013) California’s minimum nurse staffing regulation: results from a natural experiment. Health Serv Res 48(2, Part I):435–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Munnich EL (2013) The labor market effects of California’s minimum nurse staffing law. Health Econ 23(8):935–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (2011) Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol 96(1):71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K (2002) Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med 346:1715–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2013) Caring for our caregivers: facts about hospital worker safety. US. Department of Labor, Washington DC, September, 2013. Accessed 17 April 2014
  29. Ready AE, Boreskie SL, Law SA, Russell R (1993) Fitness and lifestyle parameters fail to predict back injuries in nurses. Can J Appl Physiol 18(1):80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reiter KL, Harless DW, Pink GH, Mark BA (2012) Minimum nurse staffing legislation and financial performance of California hospitals. Health Serv Res 47(3, Part I):1030–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reville RT, Seabury SA, Neuhauser FW, Burton JF, Greenberg MD (2005) An evaluation of California’s permanent disability rating system. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California. Accessed 29 April 2014
  32. Ruser JW (2008) Examining evidence on whether BLS undercounts workplace injuries and illnesses. Mon Lab Rev 131(8):20–32Google Scholar
  33. Schultz D (2013) Nurses fighting state by state for minimum staffing laws. Kais Health News April 24, 2013. Accessed 25 April 2014
  34. Serratt T, Harrington C, Spetz J, Blegen M (2011) Staffing changes before and after mandated nurse-to-patient ratios in California’s hospitals. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 12(3):133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Serratt T, Spetz J, Harrington C (2012) Are staffing changes in California’s hospitals sensitive to individual hospital characteristics? Nurs Econ 30(6):339–346Google Scholar
  36. Spetz J (2004) California’s minimum nurse-to-patient ratios: the first few months. J Nurs Adm 34:571–578Google Scholar
  37. Spetz J (2008) Nurse satisfaction and the implementation of minimum nurse staffing regulation. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 9(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spetz J, Herrera C (2010) Changes in nurse satisfaction in California, 2004 to 2008. J Nurs Manag 18:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spetz J, Harless DW, Herrera C-N, Mark BA (2013) Using minimum nurse staffing regulations to measure the relationship between nursing and hospital quality of care. Med Care Res Rev 70(4):380–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stock JH, Watson MW (2003) Introduction to econometrics. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Trinkoff AM, Lipscomb JA, Geiger-Brown J, Storr CL, Brady BA (2003) Perceived physical demands and reported musculoskeletal problems in registered nurses. Am J Prev Med 24(3):270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yip YB (2001) A study of work stress, patient handling activities and the risk of low back pain among nurses in Hong Kong. J Adv Nurs 36(6):794–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Paul Leigh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Carrie A. Markis
    • 3
  • Ana-Maria Iosif
    • 4
  • Patrick S. Romano
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Healthcare Policy and ResearchUniversity of California, Davis, School of MedicineSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public Health SciencesUC Davis Medical SchoolDavisUSA
  3. 3.Betty Irene Moore School of NursingUniversity of California, DavisSacramentoUSA
  4. 4.Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of California, Davis, School of MedicineDavisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of California, Davis, School of MedicineSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations