Advertisement

Work-related symptoms in indoor environments: a puzzling problem for the occupational physician

  • Nicola MagnavitaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purposes

People who work indoors often manifest symptoms related to the work environment. Sick building syndrome (SBS) is a condition closely associated with sealed, air-conditioned workplaces and is especially frequent in countries with a cold climate. However, it is also present in Mediterranean countries where artificial ventilation accompanies the natural one. The significance of personal factors, air quality perception, and psychosocial work conditions in relation to SBS and other work-related symptoms needs to be clarified.

Methods

Workers from 28 companies in the Latium region of Italy were invited to answer a questionnaire during their routine medical examination at the workplace. A total of 4,029 out of 4,129 took part in the survey, giving a response rate of 97.6 %.

Results

A high percentage of workers (31.9 %) reported symptoms related to work, and two-thirds of the employees (65.4 %) complained of environmental problems. In logistic regression models, personal factors (gender, smoking habit, age, and atopy), anxiety and depression, environmental discomfort and job strain were associated both with symptoms of SBS and other work-related symptoms. There was a significant association between the perception of stuffy air, dry air, and electricity and cases of SBS. Some associations between symptoms and the work environment lacked biological plausibility.

Conclusions

The occupational physician’s task is to systematically monitor workers’ symptoms and their perception of the work environment in order to analyze this relationship and indicates the best mode of preventing illness/discomfort. This paper provides a method and reference values.

Keywords

Sick building syndrome Air quality Anxiety Depression Job strain Psychosocial factors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersson K, Stridh G (1992) The use of standardized questionnaires in building related illness (BRI) and sick building syndrome (SBS) surveys. In: Levy F, Maroni M (eds) NATO/OCCM pilot study on indoor air quality. National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, pp 47–64Google Scholar
  2. Bakke JV, Moen BE, Wieslander G, Norbäck D (2007) Gender and the physical and psychosocial work environments are related to indoor air symptoms. J Occup Environ Med 49(6):641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brasche S, Bullinger M, Bronisch M, Bischof W (2001a) Eye- and skin symptoms in German office workers–subjective perception vs. objective medical screening. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203(4):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasche S, Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Gebhardt HJ, Bischof W (2001b) Why do women suffer from sick building syndrome more often than men? Subjective higher sensitivity versus objective causes. Indoor Air 11(4):217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brauer C, Mikkelsen S (2010) The influence of individual and contextual psychosocial work factors on the perception of the indoor environment at work: a multilevel analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 83(6):639–651. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0511-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brauer C, Kolstad H, Ørbaek P, Mikkelsen S (2006a) No consistent risk factor pattern for symptoms related to the sick building syndrome: a prospective population based study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79(6):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brauer C, Kolstad H, Ørbaek P, Mikkelsen S (2006b) The sick building syndrome: a chicken and egg situation? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79(6):465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burge PS (2004) Sick building syndrome. Occup Environ Med 61:185–190. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.008813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burge S, Hedge A, Wilson S et al (1987) Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. Ann Occup Hyg 31:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang C, Gershwin ME (2004) Indoor air quality and human health: truth vs mass hysteria. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 27(3):219–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finnegan MJ, Pickering CAC, Burge PS (1984) The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. BMJ 289:1573–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisk WJ, Black D, Brunner G (2011) Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. Indoor Air 21(5):357–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00719.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gann M, Corpe U, Wilson I (1990) The application of a short anxiety and depression questionnaire to oil industry staff. J Soc Occup Med 40(4):138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D (1988) Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 297(6653):897–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaakkola JJK, Heinonen OP, Seppänen O (1991) Mechanical ventilation in office buildings and the sick building syndrome. An experimental and epidemiological study. Indoor Air 1:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain. Implication for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubo T, Mizoue T, Ide R, Tokui N, Fujino Y, Minh PT et al (2006) Visual display terminal work and sick building syndrome—the role of psychosocial distress in the relationship. J Occup Health 48(2):107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lahtinen M, Sundman-Digert C, Reijula K (2004) Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: a questionnaire as a means of problem diagnosis. OEM Occup Environ Med 61:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Letz GA (1990) Sick building syndrome: acute illness among office workers—the role of building ventilation, airborne contaminants and work stress. Allergy Proc 11(3):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundin L (1999) Allergic and non-allergic students’ perception of the same high school environment. Indoor Air 9(2):92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnavita N (1998) From mass psychosis to multiple sensitivity: models of interpretation of women’s discomfort. Folia Med 69(3):1657–1670Google Scholar
  22. Magnavita N (2000) Industrial mass psychogenic illness: the unfashionable diagnosis. Br J Med Psychol 73(3):371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magnavita N (2001) Cacosmia in healthy workers. Br J Med Psychol 74(1):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magnavita N (2007a) Anxiety and depression at work. The A/D Goldberg Questionnaire. G It Med Lav Ergon 29(3):670–671Google Scholar
  25. Magnavita N (2007b) Health surveillance in ridden work environments by means of the MM040/IAQ Questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29(3):479–481Google Scholar
  26. Magnavita N (2011) Work-related stress in the indoor environment: how might we assess it? G It Med Lav Ergon 33(3, Suppl. B):B28–B32Google Scholar
  27. Magnavita N (2014a) Health surveillance of workers in indoor environments. Application of the Italian version of the MM040/IAQ Questionnaire. Med Lav 105(2):174–186Google Scholar
  28. Magnavita N (2014b) Psychosocial factors in indoor work-related symptoms. Application of the MM040/IAQ questionnaire. Med Lav 105 (in press) Google Scholar
  29. Magnavita N, Sacco A, De Lorenzo G (1995) Occupant complaints in healthy building. Healthy building ‘95, Proceedings of the ISIAQ International Conference, Milan 11–14 Sep 1995, Vol III, p 1825–1830Google Scholar
  30. Magnavita N, Ferraro P, Vincenti F (2007) Influence of work climate on the sick building syndrome. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29(3):658–660Google Scholar
  31. Meggs WJ (2009) Epidemics of mold poisoning past and present. Toxicol Ind Health 25(9–10):571–576. doi: 10.1177/0748233709348277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moffatt S, Mulloli TP, Bhopal R, Foy C, Phillimore P (2000) An exploration of awareness bias in two environmental epidemiology studies. Epidemiology 11(2):199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muzi G, Abbritti G, Accattoli MP, dell’Omo M (1998) Prevalence of irritative symptoms in a nonproblem air-conditioned office building. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71(6):372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niemelä R, Seppänen O, Korhonen P, Reijula K (2006) Prevalence of building-related symptoms as an indicator of health and productivity. Am J Ind Med 49(10):819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niven RM, Fletcher AM, Pickering CA, Faragher EB, Potter IN, Booth WB, Jones TJ, Potter PD (2000) Building sickness syndrome in healthy and unhealthy buildings: an epidemiological and environmental assessment with cluster analysis. Occup Environ Med 57(9):627–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norbäck D (2009) An update on sick building syndrome. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 9(1):55–59. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32831f8f08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pacifici R. Report on Smoking in Italy 2012. National Institute of Health, 31 May 2013. [in Italian]. http://www.iss.it/binary/fumo4/cont/Rapporto_Annuale_sul_Fumo_31_maggio_2013_PACIFICI.pdf
  38. Redlich CA, Sparer J, Cullen MR (1997) Sick-building syndrome. Lancet 349(9057):1013–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reijula K, Sundman-Digert C (2004) Assessment of indoor air problems at work with a questionnaire. OEM 61:33–38Google Scholar
  40. Runeson-Broberg R, Norbäck D (2013) Sick building syndrome (SBS) and sick house syndrome (SHS) in relation to psychosocial stress at work in the Swedish workforce. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86(8):915–922. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0827-8
  41. Skov B, Valbjorn O (1987) The, “sick buiding syndrome” in the office environment. The Danish Town Hall Study. Environ Int 13:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sundell J, Levin H, Nazaroff WW, Cain WS, Fisk WJ, Grimsrud DT, Gyntelberg F, Li Y, Persily AK, Pickering AC, Samet JM, Spengler JD, Taylor ST, Weschler CJ (2011) Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. Indoor Air 21(3):191–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00703.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zweers T, Preller L, Brunekreef B, Boleij JSM (1992) Health and indoor climate complaints of 7043 office workers in 61 buildings in the Netherlands. Indoor Air 2:127–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1992.00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public HealthUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations