Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 857 Downloads
Specific physical activities or working conditions are suspected for increasing the risk of preterm birth (PTB). The aim of this meta-analysis is to review and summarize the pre-existing evidence on the effect of shift work or long working hours on the risk of PTB.
We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990–2013) for observational and intervention studies with original data. We only included articles that met our specific criteria for language, exposure, outcome, data collection and original data that were of at least of moderate quality. The data of the included studies were pooled.
Eight high-quality studies and eight moderate-quality studies were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, no clear or statistically significant relationship between shift work and PTB was found. The summary estimate OR for performing shift work during pregnancy and the risk of PTB were 1.04 (95 % CI 0.90–1.20). For long working hours during pregnancy, the summary estimate OR was 1.25 (95 % CI 1.01–1.54), indicating a marginally statistically significant relationship but an only slightly elevated risk.
Although in many of the included studies a positive association between long working hours and PTB was seen this did reach only marginal statistical significance. In the studies included in this review, working in shifts or in night shifts during pregnancy was not significantly associated with an increased risk for PTB. For both risk factors, due to the lack of high-quality studies focusing on the risks per trimester, in particular the third trimester, a firm conclusion about an association cannot be stated.
KeywordsPreterm birth Shift work Working hours Meta-analysis
The authors wish to thank Dr. J.H.A.M. Verbeek (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland) for his help with the meta-analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Dutch Society for occupational Medicine (NVAB) (2007) Practice guideline pregnancy, postpartum period and work: advice and guidance by the occupational physician. http://nvab.artsennet.nl/Richtlijnen.htm
- Emancipatiemonitor (2012) Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) and The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP). http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/F5DF2565-1721-40A4-BF16-FF7852AAC53D/0/emancipatiemonitor2012.pdf
- Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The cochrane collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org
- Lawson CC, Whelan EA, Hibert EN, Grajewski B, Spiegelman D, Rich-Edwards JW (2009) Occupational factors and risk of preterm birth in nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:51.e1–51.e8Google Scholar
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA-statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PloS Med 6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NHS Plus. Royal College of Physicians (2009) Physical and shift work in pregnancy: occupational aspects of management. A national GuidelineGoogle Scholar
- Rothman KL, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Methodology. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/index.html
- Stinson JC, Lee KL (2003) Premature labor and birth: influence of rank and perception of fatigue in active duty military women. Mil Med 168(5):385–389Google Scholar