Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 704 Downloads
Physically demanding work may increase the risk of preterm delivery (PTD), defined as delivery before 37 weeks. We assessed the available evidence.
A systematic search in Medline, Embase and Nioshtic for the period 1990 to June 2012 for observational and intervention studies on physically demanding work (prolonged standing, heavy lifting, physical exertion, occupational fatigue and demanding posture) and PTD. Selected studies were assessed for their risk of bias and pooled using a random effects model. Results of case–control and cohort studies were reported separately in subgroups.
We found 10 studies with low risk of bias and seven studies with moderate risk of bias. Standing and walking at work during pregnancy for more than 3 h per day was associated with an increased risk for PTD [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.1–1.6)], just as lifting and carrying >5 kg [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.05–1.6)] or lifting and carrying in the third trimester of the pregnancy [OR 1.3 (95 % CI 1.01–1.8)]. Jobs that required physical effort or physical exertion were associated with an increased risk of PTD [OR 1.4 (95 % CI 1.19–1.66)]. Working during pregnancy in jobs with a combination of two or more physical tasks, physical effort or occupational fatigue was also associated with an increased risk of PTD [OR 1.5 (95 % CI 1.1–2.0)].
Physically demanding work during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of PTD, especially in jobs with a combination of tasks with physical effort. In general, only small to moderate elevations of risks were found.
KeywordsPhysically demanding work Preterm delivery Pregnancy outcome Occupational exposure
The authors wish to thank Dr. J. H. A. M. Verbeek (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland) for his help with the meta-analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Chang HH, Larson J, Blencowe H, Spong CY, Howson CP, Cairns-Smith S, Lackritz EM, Lee SK, Mason E, Serazin AC, Walani S, Simpson JL, Lawn JE (2013) Born Too Soon preterm prevention analysis group. Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet 381(9862):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koemeester AP, Leegwater A, Broersen JPJ, Hoekstra EJ (1993). Zwangerschap, postpartumperiode en lichamelijke arbeidsbelasting. Deel 1: Effecten van lichamelijke arbeidsbelasting op gezondheid en op de arbeidsparticipatie van zwangere werknemers tijdens de zwangerschap en op het zwangerschapsbeloop. Amsterdam, Coronel rapport 93-01 Ministerie van Sociale zaken en werkgelegenheid (in Dutch)Google Scholar
- Lawson CC, Whelan EA, Hibert EN, Grajewski B, Spiegelman D, Rich-Edwards JW (2009) Occupational factors and risk of preterm birth in nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:51.e1–51.e8Google Scholar
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 21(339):b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luke B, Mamelle N, Keith L, Munoz F, Minogue J, Papiernik E, Johnson TR (1995) The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: a United States nurses’ study. Research Committee of the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(3 Pt 1):849–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Magann EF, Evans SF, Chauhan SP, Nolan TE, Henderson J, Klausen JH, Newnham JP, Morrison JC (2005) The effects of standing, lifting and noise exposure on pre-term birth, growth restriction, and perinatal death in healthy low-risk working military women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 18:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mamelle N, Munoz F (1987) Occupational working conditions and preterm birth: a reliable scoring system. Am J Epidemiol 126:150–152Google Scholar
- Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB) (2007) Practice Guideline Pregnancy, Postpartum Period and Work Advice and guidance by the occupational physician. Utrecht (Translated in English) http://nvab.artsennet.nl/Artikel-3/Zwangerschap-postpartumperiode-en-werk.htm
- NHS Plus, Royal College of Physicians, Faculty of Occupational Medicine (2009) Physical and shift work in pregnancy: occupational aspects of management. A national guideline. RCP, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Review Manager (RevMan) (2012) [Computer program]. Version 5.2. Copenhagen. The Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
- Rothman KL, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Stinson JC, Lee KA (2003) Premature labor and birth: influence of rank and perception of fatigue in active duty military women. Mil Med 168:385–390Google Scholar