Psychometric properties of a German organizational justice questionnaire (G-OJQ) and its association with self-rated health: findings from the Mannheim Industrial Cohort Studies (MICS)
- 524 Downloads
The objective of the present study was to validate a German 11-item organizational justice questionnaire (G-OJQ) that consists of two subscales, referred to as “procedural justice” (PJ) and “interactional justice” (IJ) adapted from Moorman’s organizational justice (OJ) questionnaire. A second objective was to determine associations of the G-OJQ with self-rated health.
This study used cross-sectional data from an occupational cohort of 1518 factory workers from Germany (87.7 % male; mean age = 38.8 with SD = 11.9). After splitting the sample in two random subsamples, we assessed structural validity by exploratory factor analyses in one subsample and by confirmatory factor analysis in the other subsample. Internal validity was assessed by Cronbach’s α. Associations with self-reported poor health were estimated by logistic regression.
The full scale and its subscales yielded Cronbach’s α’s of ≥0.9, and item-total correlations were ≥0.5. Factor analyses confirmed the expected 2-factor structure, labeled “interactional justice” (IJ, 4 items, λ 0.43–0.94) and “procedural justice” (PJ, 7 items, λ 0.46–0.83), respectively, and showed an acceptable fit to the data (χ 2 = 61; p = .001; CFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.037). The OJ total score as well as subscale scores in the lowest quartile, when compared to the highest quartile, was associated with an ≥2.3 increased odds of reporting poor health.
The G-OJQ seems to be a valid and useful tool for observational and intervention studies in occupational settings. Future studies may additionally explore longitudinal associations and test the generalizability of the present findings to other populations and health outcomes.
KeywordsOrganizational justice Epidemiology Occupational health Germany
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiations in organizations, vol 1. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, Conn., pp 43–55Google Scholar
- Cooper CL, Williams S (1994) Creating healthy work organizations. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Danna K, Griffin RW (1999) Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Manag 25(3):357–384Google Scholar
- Elovainio M, van den Bos K, Linna A, Kivimaki M, Ala-Mursula L, Pentti J, Vahtera J (2005) Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Soc Sci Med 61(12):2501–2512. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elovainio M, Heponiemi T, Sinervo T, Magnavita N (2010b) Organizational justice and health; review of evidence. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 32((3 Suppl B)):B5–9Google Scholar
- Elovainio M, Singh-Manoux A, Ferrie JE, Shipley M, Gimeno D, De Vogli R, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Jokela M, Marmot MG, Kivimaki M (2012) Organisational justice and cognitive function in middle-aged employees: the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Commun Health 66(6):552–556. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.113407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Folger R, Greenberg J (1985) Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel systems. In: Rowland KM (ed) Research in personnel and human resources management, vol 3. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, Conn., pp 141–183Google Scholar
- Kivimaki M, Ferrie JE, Shipley M, Gimeno D, Elovainio M, de Vogli R, Vahtera J, Marmot MG, Head J (2008) Effects on blood pressure do not explain the association between organizational justice and coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II study. Psychosom Med 70(1):1–6. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815aaca3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates; distributed by the Halsted Press Division of Wiley, Hillsdale, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- WHO (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Technical Report GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Ylipaavalniemi J, Kivimaki M, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Keltikangas-Jarvinen L, Vahtera J (2005) Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: a prospective cohort study of three different models. Soc Sci Med 61(1):111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar