Advertisement

Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial

  • Sina EsmaeilzadehEmail author
  • Emel Ozcan
  • Nalan Capan
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (WUEMSDs) among computer workers.

Methods

Four hundred computer workers answered a questionnaire on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms (WUEMSS). Ninety-four subjects with WUEMSS using computers at least 3 h a day participated in a prospective, randomized controlled 6-month intervention. Body posture and workstation layouts were assessed by the Ergonomic Questionnaire. We used the Visual Analogue Scale to assess the intensity of WUEMSS. The Upper Extremity Function Scale was used to evaluate functional limitations at the neck and upper extremities. Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36. After baseline assessment, those in the intervention group participated in a multicomponent ergonomic intervention program including a comprehensive ergonomic training consisting of two interactive sessions, an ergonomic training brochure, and workplace visits with workstation adjustments. Follow-up assessment was conducted after 6 months.

Results

In the intervention group, body posture (p < 0.001) and workstation layout (p = 0.002) improved over 6 months; furthermore, intensity (p < 0.001), duration (p < 0.001), and frequency (p = 0.009) of WUEMSS decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group. Additionally, the functional status (p = 0.001), and physical (p < 0.001), and mental (p = 0.035) health-related quality of life improved significantly compared with the controls. There was no improvement of work day loss due to WUEMSS (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Ergonomic intervention programs may be effective in reducing ergonomic risk factors among computer workers and consequently in the secondary prevention of WUEMSDs.

Keywords

Ergonomic intervention Upper extremity Musculoskeletal disorders Computer workers 

Abbreviations

Health-related QoL

Health-related quality of life

NIOSH

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NMQ

Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire

SF-36

Short Form-36

UEFS

Upper Extremity Function Scale

VAS

Visual Analogue Scale

WUEMSDs

Work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders

WUEMSS

Work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms

WDL

Workday loss

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank both the management and the employees of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, who supported or participated in the study. We gratefully acknowledge the Scientific Research Projects Unit of the Istanbul University, which supported in presenting this research in the 4th Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) Conference 2012, USA (Ref. UDP-22322/2012).

Conflict of interest

No competing interests.

References

  1. Andersen JH, Thomsen JF, Overgaard E, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Vilstrup I, Kryger AI, Mikkelsen S (2003) Computer use and carpal tunnel syndrome: a 1-year follow-up study. JAMA 289:2963–2969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang DC, Kroenke K, McHorney CA (2006) Impact of pain severity and location on health-related quality of life. Rheumatol Int 26:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron S, Hales T, Hurrell J (1996) Evaluation of symptom surveys for occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med 29:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernaards CM, Bosmans JE, Hildebrandt VH, van Tulder MW, Heymans MW (2011) The cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms and pain reduction in computer workers. Occup Environ Med 68:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2002) Duration of computer use and mouse use in relation to musculoskeletal disorders of neck or upper limb. Int J Ind Ergon 30:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohr PC (2000) Efficacy of office ergonomics education. J Occup Rehabil 10:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM (2006) Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil 16:279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brisson C, Montreuil S, Punnett L (1999) Effects of an ergonomic training program on workers with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 25:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckle PW, Devereux JJ (2002) The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon 33:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor (2003) Survey of occupational injuries and illnesses; USDL-03-138. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/osnr0017.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2005
  11. Coury HJ (1998) Self-administered preventive programme for sedentary workers: reducing musculoskeletal symptoms or increasing awareness? Appl Ergon 29:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dane D, Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Dimberg L, Ali D, Lincoln A (2002) Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment. J Occup Environ Med 44:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delisle A, Larivière C, Plamondon A, Imbeau D (2006) Comparison of three computer office workstations offering forearm support: impact on upper limb posture and muscle activation. Ergonomics 49:139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devereux JJ, Vlachonikolis IG, Buckle PW (2002) Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb. Occup Environ Med 59:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faucett J, Rempel D (1994) VDT-related musculoskeletal symptoms: interactions between work posture and psychosocial work factors. Am J Ind Med 26:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Haufler AJ, Miller JK (2000) Development of a screen for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med 42:749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feuerstein M, Nicholas RA, Huang GD, Dimberg L, Ali D, Rogers H (2004) Job stress management and ergonomic intervention for work-related upper extremity symptoms. Appl Ergon 35:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, Gentry E, Ortiz DJ, Monteilh C (2002) A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 41:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C, Hannan L, Ortiz D, Kleinbaum D (2005) A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users. Occup Environ Med 62:478–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillen M, Yen IH, Trupin L, Swig L, Rugulies R, Mullen K, Font A, Burian D, Ryan G, Janowitz I, Quinlan PA, Frank J, Blanc P (2007) The association of socioeconomic status and psychosocial and physical workplace factors with musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers. Am J Ind Med 50:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hales TR, Sauter SL, Peterson MR, Fine LJ, Putz-Anderson V, Schleifer LR, Ochs TT, Bernard BP (1994) Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal users in a telecommunications company. Ergonomics 37:1603–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrich J, Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2004) A comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load and duration of computer use. Occup Environ Med 61:1027–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC, Dul J (2001) Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: description and basic qualities. Ergonomics 44:1038–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kadefors R, Laubli T (2002) Muscular disorders in computer users: introduction. Int J Ind Ergon 30:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karsh B, Moro FBP, Smith MJ (2001) The efficacy of workplace ergonomic interventions to control musculoskeletal disorders: a critical examination of the peer-reviewed literature. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2:23–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ketola R, Toivonen R, Häkkänen M, Luukkonen R, Takala EP, Viikari-Juntura E, Expert Group in Ergonomics (2002) Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A (1999) Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short-Form 36: a study of a patients with rheumatoid disorder. J Drug Ther (in Turkish) 12:102–106Google Scholar
  28. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K (1987) Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis RJ, Fogleman M, Deeb J, Crandall E, Agopsowicz D (2001) Effectiveness of a VDT ergonomics training program. Int J Ind Ergon 27:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lötters F, Burdorf A (2006) Prognostic factors for duration of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain 22:212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz DJ, Gentry E, Cohen S, Edwards A, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D (2002) A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 41:236–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mekhora K, Liston CB, Nanthavanij S, Cole JH (2000) The effect of ergonomic intervention on discomfort in computer users with tension neck syndrome. Int J Ind Ergon 26:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Olia MB, Mirmohammadi M (2012) Effects of training intervention on non-ergonomic positions among video display terminals (VDT) users. Work 1(42):1–12Google Scholar
  34. Moliner CE, Durand MJ, Desrosiers J, Coutu MF (2007) Subjective quality of life according to work status following interdisciplinary work rehabilitation consequent to musculoskeletal disability. J Occup Rehabil 17:667–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Most IG (1999) Psychosocial elements in the work environment of a large call center operation. Occup Med 14:135–147Google Scholar
  36. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), US Department of Labor (1997) Working safely with video display terminals, revised edition, OSHA-3092. http://www.osha-slc.gov/publications/OSHA3092.pdf
  37. Ozcan E, Esmaeilzadeh S, Issever H (2010) The epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Turkish computer users. In: Duffy VG (ed) Advances in human factors and ergonomics in healthcare. CRC Press, Indiana, pp 736–745Google Scholar
  38. Pillastrini P, Mugnai R, Farneti C, Bertozzi L, Bonfiglioli R, Curti S, Mattioli S, Violante FS (2007) Evaluation of two preventive interventions for reducing musculoskeletal complaints in operators of video display terminals. Phys Ther 87:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M (1997) Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. J Occup Environ Med 39:1195–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rizzo TH, Pelletier KR, Serxner S, Chikamoto Y (1997) Reducing risk factors for cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs): the impact of preventive ergonomic training on knowledge, intentions, and practices related to computer use. Am J Health Promot 11:250–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silverstein B, Clark R (2004) Interventions to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Staal JB, de Bie RA, Hendriks EJ (2007) Aetiology and management of work-related upper extremity disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Street SL, Kramer JE, Harburn KL, Hansen R, MacDermid JC (2003) Changes in postural risk and general health associated with a participatory ergonomics education program used by heavy video display terminal users: a pilot study. J Hand Ther 16:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van den Heuvel SG, de Looze MP, Hildebrandt VH (2003) Effects of software programs stimulating regular breaks and exercises on work-related neck and upper-limb disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 29:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wahlström J (2005) Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occup Med (Lond) 55:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ware JE (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36® physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Ye Z, Abe Y, Kusano Y, Takamura N, Eida K, Takemoto T, Aoyagi K (2007) The influence of visual display terminal use on the physical and mental conditions of administrative staff in Japan. J Physiol Anthropol 26:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomics, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Faculty of MedicineIstanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations