Advertisement

Contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in self-reported health among French employees

  • Marie MurciaEmail author
  • Jean-François Chastang
  • Christine Cohidon
  • Isabelle Niedhammer
  • Samotrace study group
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Social inequalities in health have been widely demonstrated. However, the mechanisms underlying these inequalities are not completely understood. The objective of the study was to examine the contribution of various types of occupational exposures to social inequalities in self-reported health (SRH).

Methods

The study population was based on a random sample of 3,463 men and 2,593 women of the population of employees in west central France (response rate: 85–90 %). Data were collected through a voluntary network of 110 occupational physicians in 2006–2007. Occupational factors included biomechanical, physical, chemical and psychosocial exposures. All occupational factors were collected by occupational physicians, except psychosocial work factors, which were measured using a self-administered questionnaire. Social position was measured using occupational groups.

Results

Strong social gradients were observed for a large number of occupational factors. Marked social gradients were also observed for SRH, manual workers and clerks/service workers being more likely to report poor health. After adjustment for occupational factors, social inequalities in SRH were substantially reduced by 76–134 % according to gender and occupational groups. The strongest impacts in reducing these inequalities were observed for biomechanical exposures and decision latitude. Differences in the contributing occupational factors were observed according to gender and occupational groups.

Conclusion

This study showed that poor working conditions contributed to explain social inequalities in SRH. It also provided elements for developing specific preventive actions for manual workers and clerks/service workers. Prevention towards reducing all occupational exposures may be useful to improve occupational health and also to reduce social inequalities in health.

Keywords

Occupation Occupational factors Psychosocial work factors Social inequalities in health 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the Samotrace study group: Albouy J., Arnaudo B., Bardot F., Berson C., Bertin C., Chevalier M., Cohidon C., Dubré J.Y., Goldberg M., Huez D., Imbernon E., Lasfargues G., Roy D. The authors also thank all the 110 occupational physicians and all the employees who participated to the Samotrace survey and made this study possible. Marie Murcia was founded by ANRT (CIFRE contract) for her PhD thesis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aldabe B, Anderson R, Lyly-Yrjanainen M, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Kelleher CC, Niedhammer I (2011) Contribution of material, occupational, and psychosocial factors in the explanation of social inequalities in health in 28 countries in Europe. J Epidemiol Commun Health 65:1123–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artazcoz L, Borrell C, Benach J (2001) Gender inequalities in health among workers: the relation with family demands. J Epidemiol Commun Health 55:639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobak M, Pikhart H, Rose R, Hertzman C, Marmot M (2000) Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Soc Sci Med 51:1343–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg V, Kristensen TS (2000) Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? Soc Sci Med 51:1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrell C, Muntaner C, Benach J, Artazcoz L (2004) Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: what is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour? Soc Sci Med 58:1869–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandola T, Siegrist J, Marmot M (2005) Do changes in effort-reward imbalance at work contribute to an explanation of the social gradient in angina? Occup Environ Med 62:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalstra JA, Kunst AE, Borrell C, Breeze E, Cambois E, Costa G, Geurts JJ, Lahelma E, Van OH, Rasmussen NK, Regidor E, Spadea T, Mackenbach JP (2005) Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int J Epidemiol 34:316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delpierre C, Lauwers-Cances V, Datta GD, Lang T, Berkman L (2009) Using self-rated health for analysing social inequalities in health: a risk for underestimating the gap between socioeconomic groups? J Epidemiol Commun Health 63:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Einarsen S (2000) Harassment and bullying at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Agress Violent Behav 5:379–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J (2002) Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health 92:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Commun Health 60:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hemstrom O (2005) Health inequalities by wage income in Sweden: the role of work environment. Soc Sci Med 61:637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huisman M, Kunst AE, Bopp M, Borgan JK, Borrell C, Costa G, Deboosere P, Gadeyne S, Glickman M, Marinacci C, Minder C, Regidor E, Valkonen T, Mackenbach JP (2005) Educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and older men and women in eight western European populations. Lancet 365:493–500Google Scholar
  14. Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaikkonen R, Rahkonen O, Lallukka T, Lahelma E (2009) Physical and psychosocial working conditions as explanations for occupational class inequalities in self-rated health. Eur J Public Health 19:458–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3:322–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, Bartley M, Lissau I, Regidor E, Mielck A, Cardano M, Dalstra JA, Geurts JJ, Helmert U, Lennartsson C, Ramm J, Spadea T, Stronegger WJ, Mackenbach JP (2005) Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. Int J Epidemiol 34:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lantz PM, Lynch JW, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Mero RP, Musick MA, Williams DR (2001) Socioeconomic disparities in health change in a longitudinal study of US adults: the role of health-risk behaviors. Soc Sci Med 53:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT (1996) Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? Am J Epidemiol 144:934–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJ, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, Kunst AE (2008) Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 358:2468–2481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monden CW (2005) Current and lifetime exposure to working conditions. Do they explain educational differences in subjective health? Soc Sci Med 60:2465–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murcia M, Chastang JF, Cohidon C, Niedhammer I (2011) Différences sociales dans les troubles de la santé mentale en population salariée: résultats issus de l’enquête Samotrace. Santé Publique 2011(suppl 6):S59–S76Google Scholar
  23. Niedhammer I (2002) Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niedhammer I, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Piciotti M, Bonenfant S (2000a) How is sex considered in recent epidemiological publications on occupational risks? Occup Environ Med 57:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niedhammer I, Siegrist J, Landre MF, Goldberg M, Leclerc A (2000b) Étude des qualités psychométriques de la version française du modèle déséquilibre efforts/récompenses. Revue d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique 48:419–437Google Scholar
  26. Niedhammer I, Tek ML, Starke D, Siegrist J (2004) Effort-reward imbalance model and self-reported health: cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort. Soc Sci Med 58:1531–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, Gendrey L, David S, Degioanni S (2006) Psychometric properties of the French version of Karasek’s “Job Content Questionnaire” and its scales measuring psychological pressures, decisional latitude and social support: the results of the SUMER study. Sante Publique 18:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, Levy D, David S, Degioanni S (2007) Exposition aux facteurs psychosociaux au travail du modèle de Karasek en France: étude méthodologique à l’aide de l’enquête nationale SUMER. Travailler 17:47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S, Kelleher C (2008) The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey. Soc Sci Med 67:1870–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niedhammer I, Bourgkard E, Chau N (2011) Occupational and behavioural factors in the explanation of social inequalities in premature and total mortality: a 12.5-year follow-up in the Lorhandicap study. Eur J Epidemiol 26:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Power C, Matthews S, Manor O (1996) Inequalities in self rated health in the 1958 birth cohort: lifetime social circumstances or social mobility? BMJ 313:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rahkonen O, Laaksonen M, Martikainen P, Roos E, Lahelma E (2006) Job control, job demands, or social class? The impact of working conditions on the relation between social class and health. J Epidemiol Commun Health 60:50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schrijvers CT, van de Mheen HD, Stronks K, Mackenbach JP (1998) Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions. Int J Epidemiol 27:1011–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sekine M, Chandola T, Martikainen P, Marmot M, Kagamimori S (2006) Socioeconomic inequalities in physical and mental functioning of Japanese civil servants: explanations from work and family characteristics. Soc Sci Med 63:430–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skalicka V, van Lenthe F, Bambra C, Krokstad S, Mackenbach J (2009) Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study. Int J Epidemiol 38:1272–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Hulst M (2003) Long workhours and health. Scand J Work Environ Health 29:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Lenthe FJ, Schrijvers CT, Droomers M, Joung IM, Louwman MJ, Mackenbach JP (2004) Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health: the Dutch GLOBE study. Eur J Public Health 14:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Oort FV, van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP (2005) Material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors in the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Commun Health 59:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren JR, Hoonakker P, Carayon P, Brand J (2004) Job characteristics as mediators in SES-health relationships. Soc Sci Med 59:1367–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yngwe MA, Diderichsen F, Whitehead M, Holland P, Burstrom B (2001) The role of income differences in explaining social inequalities in self rated health in Sweden and Britain. J Epidemiol Commun Health 55:556–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Murcia
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Jean-François Chastang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christine Cohidon
    • 5
  • Isabelle Niedhammer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Samotrace study group
  1. 1.INSERM, U1018CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of Occupational and Social Determinants of Health TeamVillejuifFrance
  2. 2.Univ Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018VillejuifFrance
  3. 3.Université de Versailles St-Quentin, UMRS 1018VillejuifFrance
  4. 4.APST CentreBloisFrance
  5. 5.DST, InVS-UMRESTTELyonFrance

Personalised recommendations