The good character at work: an initial study on the contribution of character strengths in identifying healthy and unhealthy work-related behavior and experience patterns
Positive psychological functioning has been related to various positive work-related outcome variables, such as job satisfaction or work engagement. The aim of the present study was to examine the relations between morally positively valued traits (i.e., strengths of character) and work-related behaviors.
A sample of 887 adult women completed the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) and the Work-related Behavior and Experience Patterns Questionnaire (AVEM) in an online survey.
Those assigned to healthy work-related behavior and experience patterns differed in their strengths profiles from those that demonstrated unhealthy patterns (i.e., burnout type) in a predictable way. Especially the strengths of zest, persistence, hope, and curiosity seemed to play a key role in healthy and ambitious work behavior.
The study underlines the relevance of character strengths in work settings and suggests that interventions based on character strengths could substantiate interventions already existing at the workplace in order to enhance positive work outcomes further (e.g., work satisfaction, engagement).
KeywordsBurnout Character strengths Positive psychology Work-related behavior and experience
The authors are grateful to Katharina Klohe for proofreading the manuscript. Data collection was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (No. 132512) and the Suzanne and Hans Biäsch Foundation for Applied Psychology.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Carver CS, Scheier MF, Miller CJ, Fulford D (2009) Optimism. In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR (eds) Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 303–313Google Scholar
- Coyne I, Bartram D (eds) (2006) ITC guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. Int J Test 6. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_3
- Hodges TD, Clifton DO (2004) Strengths-based development in practice. In: Linley AP, Joseph S (eds) Positive psychology in practice. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 256–268Google Scholar
- Khumalo IP, Wissing MP, Themane QM (2008) Exploring the validity of the Values-In-Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in an African context. J Psychol Af 18:133–144Google Scholar
- Magyar-Moe JL (2009) Therapist’s guide to positive psychological interventions. Academic Press/Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- Peterson C (2006) The values in action (VIA) classification of strengths. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi IS (eds) A life worth living. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 29–48Google Scholar
- Peterson C, Park N (2004) Classification and measurement of character strengths: implications for practice. In: Linley PA, Joseph S (eds) Positive psychology in practice. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 433–446Google Scholar
- Peterson C, Seligman MEP (2004) Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP (2005) Assessment of character strengths. In: Koocher GP, Norcross JC, Hill SS (eds) Psychologists’ desk reference, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–98Google Scholar
- Peterson C, Stephens JP, Park N, Lee F, Seligman MEP (2010) Strengths of character and work. In: Linley PA, Harrington S, Garcea N (eds) Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 221–231Google Scholar
- Proyer RT, Ruch W (2009) How virtuous are gelotophobes? Self- and peer-reported character strengths among those who fear being laughed at. Humor: Int J Humor Res 22:145–163. doi: 10.1515/HUMR.2009.007
- Ruch W, Huber A, Beermann U, Proyer RT (2007) Character strengths as predictors of the “good life” in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. In: Romanian Academy, “George Barit” Institute of History, Department of Social Research (ed) Studies and researches in social sciences, vol 16. Argonaut Press, Cluj-Napoca, pp 123–131Google Scholar
- Schaarschmidt U, Fischer AW (1997) AVEM—ein diagnostisches Instrument zur Differenzierung von Typen gesundheitsrelevanten Verhaltens und Erlebens gegenüber der Arbeit [AVEM—an instrument for diagnosing different types of work - and health-related behavior and experience]. Z Differ Diagn Psychol 18:151–163Google Scholar
- Schaarschmidt U, Fischer AW (2001) Coping with professional demands: a new diagnostic approach. In: Kallus KW, Posthumus N, Jiménez P (eds) Current psychological research in Austria. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, pp 145–149Google Scholar
- Schaarschmidt U, Fischer AW (2008) Arbeitsbezogenes Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster AVEM, 3rd edn. Pearson PLC, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Schaarschmidt U, Kieschke U, Fischer AW (2006) Diagnostik beruflichen Bewältigungsverhaltens auf der Grundlage eines ressourcenorientierten Ansatzes [Individual resources of coping with occupational stress. A type diagnostic approach]. Wirtsch Psychol 2:56–63Google Scholar
- Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (2007) Positive psychology: the scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Vansteenkiste M, Neyrinck B, Niemiec CP, Soenens B, De Witte H, Van den Broeck A (2007) On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: a self-determination theory approach. J Occup Organ Psychol 80:251–277. doi: 10.1348/096317906X111024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warr P (1999) Well-being in the workplace. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 393–412Google Scholar