Sickness presenteeism is more than an alternative to sickness absence: results from the population-based SLOSH study

  • Constanze Leineweber
  • Hugo Westerlund
  • Jan Hagberg
  • Pia Svedberg
  • Kristina Alexanderson
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Sickness presenteeism, defined as ‘going to work despite judging that one should have reported in sick’, is usually considered to be a complementary alternative to sickness absence. Nonetheless, several studies have reported a positive association between sickness absence and sickness presenteeism. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the contemporaneous positive association between sickness absence and sickness presenteeism can be explained by illness, work incapacity, and/or work environment.

Methods

A cross-sectional study based on answers to a comprehensive questionnaire from 8,304 working women and men, those in the second wave of the nationally representative Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between sickness presenteeism and sickness absence.

Results

Sickness absence was strongly associated with sickness presenteeism. Sickness absence of 1–7 days during a 12-month period more than doubled the odds of also having sickness presenteeism of more than 8 days during the same 12-month period (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.79–2.49). Adjusting for age and sex did not attenuate the association; further adjustment for work environment, self-rated health, chronic diseases, and work capacity reduced the odds somewhat, but they remained highly significant (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.56–2.25).

Conclusions

The results suggest that sickness presenteeism is not, as earlier hypothesised, just an alternative to sickness absence, given a certain level of health or work incapacity. Other, so far unknown explanations for both sickness absence and sickness presenteeism must be sought.

Keywords

Sick leave Sickness absence Sickness presenteeism Sweden Working conditions 

Supplementary material

420_2012_735_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (188 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 187 kb)
420_2012_735_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (78 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 77 kb)

References

  1. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K (2005) Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. J Occup Environ Med 47(9):958–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M (2000) Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemiol Commun Health 54:502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronsson G, Svensson L, Gustafsson K (2003) Unwinding, recuperation, and health among compulsory school and high school teachers in Sweden. Int J Stress Manag 10(3):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benyamini Y, Idler EL (1999) Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality: additional studies, 1995 to 1999. Res Aging 21(3):392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergstrom G, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Aronsson G, Josephson M (2009a) Sickness presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism. J Occup Environ Med 51(6):629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstrom G, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Lindh T, Aronsson G, Josephson M (2009b) Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(10):1179–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bockerman P, Laukkanen E (2010) Predictors of sickness absence and presenteeism: does the pattern differ by a respondent’s health? J Occup Environ Med 52(3):332–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdorf A, Post W, Bruggeling T (1996) Reliability of a questionnaire on sickness absence with specific attention to absence due to back pain and respiratory complaints. Occup Environ Med 53(1):58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caverley N, Cunningham JB, MacGregor JN (2007) Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. J Manag Stud 44(2):304–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00690.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conway JM, Lance CE (2010) What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. J Bus Psychol 25:325–334. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elstad JI, Vabo M (2008) Job stress, sickness absence and sickness presenteeism in Nordic elderly care. Scand J Public Health 36(5):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrie JE, Kivimaki M, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG (2005) A comparison of self-reported sickness absence with absences recorded in employers’ registers: evidence from the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 62(2):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredriksson K, Toomingas A, Torgen M, Thorbjornsson CB, Kilbom A (1998) Validity and reliability of self-reported retrospectively collected data on sick leave related to musculoskeletal diseases. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(5):425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallberg UE, Sverke M (2004) Construct validity of the Maslach burnout inventory: two Swedish health care samples. Eur J Psychol Assess 20(4):320–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen CD, Andersen JH (2008) Going ill to work–what personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Soc Sci Med 67(6):956–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanson LL, Akerstedt T, Naswall K, Leineweber C, Theorell T, Westerlund H (2011) Cross-lagged relationships between workplace demands, control, support, and sleep problems. Sleep 34(10):1403–1410. doi:10.5665/SLEEP.1288 Google Scholar
  17. Hensing G (2004) Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scand J Public Health Suppl 63:44–48. doi:10.1080/14034950410021844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Pentti J, Virtanen M, Westerlund H, Virtanen P, Oksanen T, Kivimaki M, Vahtera J (2010) Association of contractual and subjective job insecurity with sickness presenteeism among public sector employees. J Occup Environ Med 52(8):830–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, Johansson G, Lindholm C, Lundberg I, Moller J (2010) Low level of adjustment latitude–a risk factor for sickness absence. Eur J Pub Health 20(6):682–688. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell T (1981) Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health 71(7):694–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kivimäki M, Head J, Ferrie J, Hemingway H, Shipley M, Vahtera J, Marmot M (2005) Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Am J Public Health 95:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koopmanschap M, Burdorf A, Jacob K, Meerding WJ, Brouwer W, Severens H (2005) Measuring productivity changes in economic evaluation: setting the research agenda. Pharmacoeconomics 23(1):47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipmann R (1986) Depression scales derived from Hopkins symptom checklist. In: Sartorius N, Bann T (eds) Assessment of depression. Springer, Berlin, pp 232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magnusson Hanson LL, Theorell T, Bech P, Rugulies R, Burr H, Hyde M, Oxenstierna G, Westerlund H (2009) Psychosocial working conditions and depressive symptoms among Swedish employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(8):951–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (1996) Maslach burnout inventory manual, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  26. Meade AW, Watson AM, Kroustalis CM (2007) Assessing common methods bias in organizational research. Paper presented at the paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyberg A, Westerlund H, Magnusson Hanson L, Theorell T (2008) Managerial leadership is associated with self-reported sickness absence and sickness presenteeism among Swedish men and women. Scand J Public Health 36:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oyeflaten I, Hysing M, Eriksen HR (2008) Prognostic factors associated with return to work following multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 40(7):548–554. doi:10.2340/16501977-0202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schultz AB, Edington DW (2007) Employee health and presenteeism: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 17:547–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Svedberg P, Ropponen A, Lichtenstein P, Alexanderson K (2010) Are self-report of disability pension and long-term sickness absence accurate? Comparisons of self-reported interview data with national register data in a Swedish twin cohort. BMC Public Health 10:763. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Theorell T, Perski A, Akerstedt T, Sigala F, Ahlberg-Hultén G, Svensson J, Eneroth P (1988) Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state. A longitudinal study. Scand J Work Environ Health 14(3):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Theorell T, Oxenstierna G, Westerlund H, Ferrie J, Hagberg J, Alfredsson L (2003) Downsizing of staff is associated with lowered medically certified sick leave in female employees. Occup Environ Med 60(9):E9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Poppel MN, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Smid T, Bouter LM (2002) Measuring sick leave: a comparison of self-reported data on sick leave and data from company records. Occup Med (Lond) 52(8):485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vingard E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A (2004) Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave. Scand J Public Health Suppl 63:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallman T, Wedel H, Johansson S, Rosengren A, Eriksson H, Welin L et al (2006) The prognosis for individuals on disability retirement. An 18-year mortality follow-up study of 6887 men and women sampled from the general population. BMC Public Health 6:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wikman A, Marklund S, Alexanderson K (2005) Illness, disease, and sickness absence: an empirical test of differences between concepts of ill health. J Epidemiol Commun Health 59(6):450–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolke D, Waylen A, Samara M, Steer C, Goodman R, Ford T, Lamberts K (2009) Selective drop-out in longitudinal studies and non-biased prediction of behaviour disorders. Br J Psychiatry 195(3):249–256. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constanze Leineweber
    • 1
  • Hugo Westerlund
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jan Hagberg
    • 2
  • Pia Svedberg
    • 3
  • Kristina Alexanderson
    • 3
  1. 1.Stress Research InstituteStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.The Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM)Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations