Identifying patterns of recovery experiences and their links to psychological outcomes across one year
- 466 Downloads
The main aim of this study was to examine patterns of recovery experiences (i.e., psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery and control during off-job time) and their links to psychological outcomes (job burnout, work engagement and sleep problems) across 1 year.
The study is based on 1-year longitudinal data collected among Finnish employees (n = 274) using questionnaires. First, patterns of recovery experiences, that is, subgroups of employees with unique and distinctive patterns of mean-level stability and change in recovery experiences across 1 year were identified using Latent Profile Analysis. Second, differences in psychological outcomes between the patterns identified were investigated by means of ANOVA/ANCOVA for repeated measures.
Five patterns of recovery experiences were identified. Over 70% of the employees belonged to a pattern with reasonably high stable levels of all four recovery experiences across the 1-year follow-up. This pattern seemed to suffer least from job burnout and sleep problems. Of the four remaining patterns, those with experiences of high levels of mastery and control during off-job time had highest work engagement, and among those with decreasing levels of all recovery experiences job exhaustion increased across time.
Patterns of recovery experiences play a significant role in maintaining long-term psychological well-being.
KeywordsRecovery from work stress Recovery experiences Sleep problems Job burnout Work engagement
The research project “The Role of Recovery from Job Strain in Maintaining Occupational Well-being” was financially supported by The Finnish Work Environment Fund (grant No. 106046).
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Åkerstedt T (2006) Psychosocial stress and impaired sleep. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:493–501Google Scholar
- Åkerstedt T, Nilsson PM, Kecklund G (2009) Sleep and recovery. In: Sonnentag S, Perrewé PL, Ganster DC (eds) Current perspectives on job-stress recovery. Emerald, Bingley, pp 205–247Google Scholar
- Cudeck R, Browne MW (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Scott Long J (eds) Testing structural equation models. CA7 Sage, Newbury Park, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- Eden D (2001) Vacations and other respites: studying stress on and off the job. In: Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds) International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 121–146Google Scholar
- Geurts S, Sonnentag S (2006) Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:482–492Google Scholar
- Hobfoll SE (1998) Stress, culture, and community: the psychology and physiology of stress. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jöreskog K, Sörbom D (1996) LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, ChigacoGoogle Scholar
- Kalimo R, Hakanen J, Toppinen-Tanner S (2006) Maslachin yleinen työuupumuksen arviointimenetelmä MBI-GS. [The Finnish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory—General Survey]. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP (1996) Maslach burnout inventory manual, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- Meijman TF, Mulder G (1998) Psychological aspects of workload. In: Drenth PJD, Thierry H (eds) Handbook of work and organizational psychology, vol 2. Work psychology. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 5–33Google Scholar
- Muthèn BO (2001) Latent variable mixture modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (eds) New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 1–33Google Scholar
- Muthèn LK, Muthèn OB (1998–2008) Mplus user’s guide. http://www.statmodel.com/index2.html
- Satorra A, Bentler PM (2005) Chi-square difference testing using the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square. http://www.stat.ucla.edu/papers/preprints1260/
- Sonnentag S, Geurts SAE (2009) Methodological issues in recovery research. In: Sonnentag S, Perrewé PL, Ganster DC (eds) Current perspectives on job-stress recovery. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–36Google Scholar