Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers
- 1.7k Downloads
To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort–reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support).
A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort–Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted.
In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement.
The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.
KeywordsOrganizational justice Job demands-control model Effort–reward imbalance model Psychological distress Work engagement
The present study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 2004–2007 (No. 16390170) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The final preparation of the manuscript was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 2008–2009 (No. 20240062) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22:309–328Google Scholar
- Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 43–55Google Scholar
- Demerouti E, Bakker AB, de Jonge J, Janssen PPM, Schaufeli WB (2001a) Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:279–286Google Scholar
- Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, Tachimori H, Iwata N, Uda H, Nakane H, Watanabe M, Naganuma Y, Hata Y, Kobayashi M, Miyake Y, Takeshima T, Kikkawa T (2008) The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karasek R (1985) Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. University of Massachusetts at Lowell, LowellGoogle Scholar
- Kawakami N, Kobayashi F, Araki S, Haratani T, Furui H (1995) Assessment of job stress dimensions based on the job demands-control model of employees of telecommunication and electric power companies in Japan: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of job content questionnaire. Int J Behav Med 2:358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Warren K, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE (1994) Association between ambulatory blood pressure and alternative formulations of job strain. Scand J Work Environ Health 20:349–363Google Scholar
- Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 25–27Google Scholar
- Nakane C (1970) Japanese society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kosugi S, Suzuki A, Nashiwa H, Kato A, Sakamoto M, Irimajiri H, Amano S, Hirohata K, Goto R, Kitaoka-Higashiguchi K (2008) Work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale. Appl Psychol Int Rev 57:510–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shirom A (2003) Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In: Ganster D, Perrewe PL (eds) Research in organizational stress and well-being, vol 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 135–165Google Scholar
- Thibaut J, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar