Advertisement

Organizational justice, psychological distress, and work engagement in Japanese workers

  • Akiomi InoueEmail author
  • Norito Kawakami
  • Masao Ishizaki
  • Akihito Shimazu
  • Masao Tsuchiya
  • Masaji Tabata
  • Miki Akiyama
  • Akiko Kitazume
  • Mitsuyo Kuroda
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the cross-sectional association between organizational justice (i.e., procedural justice and interactional justice) and psychological distress or work engagement, as well as the mediating roles of other job stressors (i.e., job demands and job control, or their combination, effort–reward imbalance [ERI], and worksite support).

Methods

A total of 243 workers (185 males and 58 females) from a manufacturing factory in Japan were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire including the Organizational Justice Questionnaire, Job Content Questionnaire, Effort–Reward Imbalance Questionnaire, K6 scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and other covariates. Multiple mediation analyses with the bootstrap technique were conducted.

Results

In the bivariate analysis, procedural justice and interactional justice were significantly and negatively associated with psychological distress; they were significantly and positively associated with work engagement. In the mediation analysis, reward at work (or ERI) significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and psychological distress; worksite support significantly mediated between procedural justice or interactional justice and work engagement.

Conclusion

The effects of organizational justice on psychological distress seem to be mediated by reward at work (or ERI) while those regarding work engagement may be mediated by worksite support to a large extent, at least in Japanese workers.

Keywords

Organizational justice Job demands-control model Effort–reward imbalance model Psychological distress Work engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 2004–2007 (No. 16390170) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The final preparation of the manuscript was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 2008–2009 (No. 20240062) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowits L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22:309–328Google Scholar
  3. Bakker AB, Hakanen JJ, Demerouti E, Xanthopoulou D (2007) Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J Educ Psychol 99:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 43–55Google Scholar
  6. Bourbonnais R (2007) Are job stress models capturing important dimensions of the psychosocial work environment? Occup Environ Med 64:640–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, de Jonge J, Janssen PPM, Schaufeli WB (2001a) Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:279–286Google Scholar
  8. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB (2001b) The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol 86:499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards JR (2008) To prosper organizational psychology should…overcome methodological barriers to progress. J Organ Behav 29:469–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Helkama K (2001) Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. J Appl Psychol 86:418–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J (2002) Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health 92:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrie JE, Head J, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG, Kivimäki M (2006) Injustice at work and incidence of psychiatric morbidity: the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 63:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujishiro K, Heaney CA (2009) Justice at work, job stress, and employee health. Health Educ Behav 36:487–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, Tachimori H, Iwata N, Uda H, Nakane H, Watanabe M, Naganuma Y, Hata Y, Kobayashi M, Miyake Y, Takeshima T, Kikkawa T (2008) The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hakanen J, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB (2006) Burnout and work engagement among teachers. J Sch Psychol 43:495–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inoue A, Kawakami N, Tsutsumi A, Shimazu A, Tsuchiya M, Ishizaki M, Tabata M, Akiyama M, Kitazume A, Kuroda M, Kivimäki M (2009) Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Organizational Justice Questionnaire. J Occup Health 51:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson JV, Hall EM (1988) Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 78:1336–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karasek R (1985) Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. University of Massachusetts at Lowell, LowellGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawachi I (2006) Injustice at work and health: causation or correlation? Occup Environ Med 63:578–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawakami N, Kobayashi F, Araki S, Haratani T, Furui H (1995) Assessment of job stress dimensions based on the job demands-control model of employees of telecommunication and electric power companies in Japan: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of job content questionnaire. Int J Behav Med 2:358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32:959–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Ferrie JE (2003a) Organisational justice and health of employees: prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 60:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Vahtera J, Virtanen M, Stansfeld SA (2003b) Association between organizational inequity and incidence of psychiatric disorders in female employees. Psychol Med 33:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Siegrist J (2007) Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med 64:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koyuncu M, Burke RJ, Fiksenbaum L (2006) Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Oppor Int 25:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Warren K, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE (1994) Association between ambulatory blood pressure and alternative formulations of job strain. Scand J Work Environ Health 20:349–363Google Scholar
  28. Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 25–27Google Scholar
  29. Llorens S, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Salanova M (2006) Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. Int J Stress Manag 13:378–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moorman RH (1991) Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol 76:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakane C (1970) Japanese society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  32. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2004) Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav 25:293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 3:71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas 66:701–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kosugi S, Suzuki A, Nashiwa H, Kato A, Sakamoto M, Irimajiri H, Amano S, Hirohata K, Goto R, Kitaoka-Higashiguchi K (2008) Work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale. Appl Psychol Int Rev 57:510–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shirom A (2003) Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In: Ganster D, Perrewe PL (eds) Research in organizational stress and well-being, vol 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 135–165Google Scholar
  39. Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7:422–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot MG, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skarlicki DP, Latham GP (1996) Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: a test of organizational justice theory. J Appl Psychol 2:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith CA, Organ DW, Near JP (1983) Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. J Appl Psychol 68:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend? Organ Res Methods 9:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spector PE, Zapf D, Chen PY, Frese M (2000) Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. J Organ Behav 21:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sutinen R, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Forma P (2005) Associations between stress at work and attitudes towards retirement in hospital physicians. Work Stress 19:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thibaut J, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsutsumi A, Ishitake T, Peter R, Siegrist J, Matoba T (2001) The Japanese version of the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire: a study in dental technicians. Work Stress 15:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ylipaavalniemi J, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Vahtera J (2005) Psychosocial work characteristics and incidence of newly diagnosed depression: a prospective cohort study of three different models. Soc Sci Med 61:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akiomi Inoue
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norito Kawakami
    • 1
  • Masao Ishizaki
    • 2
  • Akihito Shimazu
    • 1
  • Masao Tsuchiya
    • 1
  • Masaji Tabata
    • 3
  • Miki Akiyama
    • 4
    • 5
  • Akiko Kitazume
    • 5
  • Mitsuyo Kuroda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Social and Environmental Medicine (Hygiene)Kanazawa Medical UniversityUchinadaJapan
  3. 3.Ishikawa Health Service AssociationKanazawaJapan
  4. 4.Division of Nursing, Faculty of HealthcareTokyo Healthcare UniversityShinagawa-kuJapan
  5. 5.Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoBunkyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations