Comparing working conditions and physical and psychological health complaints in four occupational groups working in female-dominated workplaces
- First Online:
- 267 Downloads
Dominant theories of working conditions and their effects on poor employee health have been criticized for failing to consider how psychosocial factors interact and how such relationships may differ across occupational groups.
This paper examines the associations between psychosocial factors and physical and psychological health complaints while at the same time taking into account differences between occupational groups in female-dominated professions.
Four female-dominated occupational groups were included: nurses, health care assistants, cleaners, and dairy industry workers. The relationships between influence, emotional and quantitative demands, social support, back pain, and behavioural stress were examined using structural equation modelling.
Results supported a group-specific model: the overall pattern remained the same across groups while psychosocial factors had different impacts on poor health and interacted differently across groups. The results also indicated links between psychosocial factors and poor physical health.
The study confirmed the importance of differentiating between female-dominated occupations rather than talking about women’s working conditions as such. The study also emphasized the importance of considering psychosocial risk factors when examining physical health, in this case back pain.
KeywordsFemale-dominated occupations Multi-group analysis Structural equation modelling Back pain Psychosocial work environment Stress
- Ahlberg-Hultén G, Theorell T, Sigala F (1995) Social support, job strain and musculoskeletal pain among female health care personnel. Scand J Work Environ Health 21:435–439Google Scholar
- Browne M, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Long JS, Bollen KA (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Byrne BM (1994) Burnout: testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Am Educ Res J 31:645–673Google Scholar
- Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- de Lange A, Taris T, Kompier M, Houtman I, Bongers P (2004) The relationships between work characteristics and menatal health: examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. Work Stress 18:282–305Google Scholar
- Fagan C, Burchell B (2002) Gender, jobs and working conditions in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
- Firth H, Britton P (1989) Burnout, absence and turnover among nurses: integrating research findings across studies. Nurs Res 44:246–253Google Scholar
- Fourth European Working Conditions Survey (2005) Ireland, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsGoogle Scholar
- Hall EM (1992) Gender, work control, and stress: a theoretical discussion and an empirical test. Int J Health Serv 19:725–745Google Scholar
- Hochschild AR (1983) The managed heart: the commercialization of human feeling. UCP, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Jackson P, Sprigg C, Parker S (2000) Interdependence as a key requirement for the successful introduction of teamworking: a case study. In: Procter S, Mueller F (eds) Teamworking. MacMillan Business, Basingstoke, pp 83–137Google Scholar
- Jex S, Adams G, Ehler M (2002) Assessing the role of negative affectivity in occupational stress research. In: Nelson D, Burke R (eds) Gender, work stress and health. APA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2000) LISREL 8.3: structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lawrence Erlbaum, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Kanter RM (1977) Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Krause N, Ragland DR, Griener BA, Syme L, Fisher JM (1997) Psychosocial job factors associated with back and neck pain in public transit operators. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:179–186Google Scholar
- Kristensen T, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V (2005) The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 31(6):438–449Google Scholar
- Lennon M, Rosenfeld S (1992) Women and mental health: the interaction of job and family conditions. J Health Soc Behav 31:6–327Google Scholar
- Perrewé P, Carlson D (2002) Do men and women benefit from social support equally? Results from a field examination within the work and family context. In: Nelson D, Burke R (eds) Gender, work stress and health. APA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Skues J, Kirkeby R (1999) Women in the workforce: gender differences in occupational stress and coping. In: Cotton P, Fisher B (eds) Psychological health in the workplace, 2nd edn. The Australian Psychological Society, CarltonGoogle Scholar
- Sprigg C, Jackson P, Parker S (2000) Production teamworking: the importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Hum Relat 53:1519–1543Google Scholar