Comparing working conditions and physical and psychological health complaints in four occupational groups working in female-dominated workplaces

  • Karina Nielsen
  • Karen Albertsen
  • Sten-Olof Brenner
  • Lars Smith-Hansen
  • Christian Roepsdorff
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Dominant theories of working conditions and their effects on poor employee health have been criticized for failing to consider how psychosocial factors interact and how such relationships may differ across occupational groups.

Goal

This paper examines the associations between psychosocial factors and physical and psychological health complaints while at the same time taking into account differences between occupational groups in female-dominated professions.

Method

Four female-dominated occupational groups were included: nurses, health care assistants, cleaners, and dairy industry workers. The relationships between influence, emotional and quantitative demands, social support, back pain, and behavioural stress were examined using structural equation modelling.

Results

Results supported a group-specific model: the overall pattern remained the same across groups while psychosocial factors had different impacts on poor health and interacted differently across groups. The results also indicated links between psychosocial factors and poor physical health.

Conclusion

The study confirmed the importance of differentiating between female-dominated occupations rather than talking about women’s working conditions as such. The study also emphasized the importance of considering psychosocial risk factors when examining physical health, in this case back pain.

Keywords

Female-dominated occupations Multi-group analysis Structural equation modelling Back pain Psychosocial work environment Stress 

References

  1. Ahlberg-Hultén G, Theorell T, Sigala F (1995) Social support, job strain and musculoskeletal pain among female health care personnel. Scand J Work Environ Health 21:435–439Google Scholar
  2. Bakker A, Demerouti E, Verbeke W (2004) Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resour Manage 43:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron R, Kenny D (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley JR, Cartwright S (2002) Social support, job stress, health, and job satisfaction among nurses in the United Kingdom. Int J Stress Manage 9:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne M, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Long JS, Bollen KA (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bru E, Mykletun R, Svebak E (1996) Work-related stress and musculoskeletal pain among female hospital staff. Work Stress 10:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne BM (1991) The Maslach burnout inventory: validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivar Behav Res 26:583–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne BM (1994) Burnout: testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Am Educ Res J 31:645–673Google Scholar
  9. Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng E (2001) SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management development research. J Manage Dev 20:650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Lange A, Taris T, Kompier M, Houtman I, Bongers P (2004) The relationships between work characteristics and menatal health: examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. Work Stress 18:282–305Google Scholar
  12. Evans O, Steptoe A (2002) The contribution of gender-role orientation, work factors and home stressors to psychological well-being and sickness absence in male- and female-dominated occupational groups. Soc Sci Med 54:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagan C, Burchell B (2002) Gender, jobs and working conditions in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
  14. Firth H, Britton P (1989) Burnout, absence and turnover among nurses: integrating research findings across studies. Nurs Res 44:246–253Google Scholar
  15. Fourth European Working Conditions Survey (2005) Ireland, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall EM (1992) Gender, work control, and stress: a theoretical discussion and an empirical test. Int J Health Serv 19:725–745Google Scholar
  17. Hochschild AR (1983) The managed heart: the commercialization of human feeling. UCP, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoogendoorn W, Van Poppel M, Bongers P, Koes B, Bouter L (2000) Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 25:2114–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houkes I, Janssen PPM, de Jonge J, Bakker A (2003) Specific determinants of intrinsic work motivation, emotional exhaustion and turnover intention: a multisample longitudinal study. J Occup Organ Psychol 76:427–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson P, Sprigg C, Parker S (2000) Interdependence as a key requirement for the successful introduction of teamworking: a case study. In: Procter S, Mueller F (eds) Teamworking. MacMillan Business, Basingstoke, pp 83–137Google Scholar
  21. Jex S, Adams G, Ehler M (2002) Assessing the role of negative affectivity in occupational stress research. In: Nelson D, Burke R (eds) Gender, work stress and health. APA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2000) LISREL 8.3: structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lawrence Erlbaum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanter RM (1977) Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Krause N, Ragland DR, Griener BA, Syme L, Fisher JM (1997) Psychosocial job factors associated with back and neck pain in public transit operators. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:179–186Google Scholar
  26. Kristensen T, Bjorner JB, Christensen JB, Borg V (2004) The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands. Work Stress 18:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristensen T, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V (2005) The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 31(6):438–449Google Scholar
  28. Lagerström M, Wenemark M, Hagberg M, Wigeaus Helm E (1995) Occupational and individual factors related to musculoskeletal symptoms in five body regions among Swedish nursing personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Med 68:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lennon M, Rosenfeld S (1992) Women and mental health: the interaction of job and family conditions. J Health Soc Behav 31:6–327Google Scholar
  30. Marsh H, Balla J, McDonald R (1988) Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 1003(3):391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrath A, Reid N, Boore J (2003) Occupational stress in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 40:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikkelsen A, Saksvik PØ, Landbergis P (2000) The impact of a participatory approach organizational intervention on job stress in community health care institutions. Work Stress 14:156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller K, Greyling M, Cooper C, Lu L, Sparks K, Spector P (2000) Occupational stress and gender: a cross-cultural study. Stress Med 16:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson D, Burke R, Michie S (2002) New directions for studying gender, work stress, and health. In: Nelson D, Burke R (eds) Gender, work stress and health. APA, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen K, Randall R, Albertsen K (2007) Participants’ appraisal of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions. J Organ Behav 28:793–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perrewé P, Carlson D (2002) Do men and women benefit from social support equally? Results from a field examination within the work and family context. In: Nelson D, Burke R (eds) Gender, work stress and health. APA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pousette A, Hanse J (2002) Job characteristics as predictors of ill-health and sickness absenteeism in different occupational types—a multigroup structural equation modelling approach. Work Stress 16:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schaubroeck J, Fink L (1998) Facilitating and inhibiting effects of job control and social support on stress outcomes and role behavior: a contingency model. J Organ Behav 19:167–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Setterlind S, Larsson G (1995) The stress profile: a psychosocial approach to measuring stress. Stress Med 11:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegrist J (2005) Social reciprocity and health: new scientific evidence and policy implications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:1033–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skues J, Kirkeby R (1999) Women in the workforce: gender differences in occupational stress and coping. In: Cotton P, Fisher B (eds) Psychological health in the workplace, 2nd edn. The Australian Psychological Society, CarltonGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprigg C, Jackson P, Parker S (2000) Production teamworking: the importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Hum Relat 53:1519–1543Google Scholar
  43. Tornqvist EW, Kilbom Å, Vingård E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Theorell T, Waldenström M, Wiktorim C, Hogstedt, the MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group (2001) The influence on seeking care due to neck and shoulder disorders from work-related disorders. Epidemiology 12:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tummers G, Landeweerd J, Van Merode G (2002) Work organization, work characteristics, and their psychological effects on nurses in the Netherlands. Int J Stress Manage 9:183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van der Doef M, Maes S (1999) The job demand-control(-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 13:87–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Vegchel N, Schaufeli W, Dormann C, Söderfeldt M, de Jonge J (2004) Quantitative versus emotional demands among Swedish human service employees: moderating effects of job control and social support. Int J Stress Manage 11:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli W (2005) Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 60:1117–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vermeulen M, Mustard C (2000) Gender differences in job strain, social support at work and psychological distress. J Occup Health Psychol 5:428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zapf D (2002) Emotion work and psychological well-being: a review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Hum Resour Manage Rev 12:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zapf D, Dormann C, Frese M (1996) Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. J Occup Psychol 1:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karina Nielsen
    • 1
  • Karen Albertsen
    • 1
  • Sten-Olof Brenner
    • 2
  • Lars Smith-Hansen
    • 1
  • Christian Roepsdorff
    • 1
  1. 1.The National Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.The National Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentUniversity of KristianstadKristianstadSweden

Personalised recommendations