Associations between two job stress models and measures of salivary cortisol
- 560 Downloads
To investigate the association between two job stress models—the job demand-control model and the effort-reward imbalance model—and repeated measures of salivary cortisol among male and female call-centre operators.
Daily cortisol profiles consisting of seven time points were measured across two workdays and one leisure day to determine the cortisol awakening response and the cortisol output in the day in 104 volunteers. The employees completed two self-administered questionnaire—the Karasek’s demand-control questionnaire and the Siegrist’s effort-reward imbalance questionnaire—to assess psychosocial hazards at work. The relations between the perceived workload measures and salivary cortisol levels were analyzed by means of generalized estimating equations method after adjusting for potential confounders (gender, age, educational level, marital status, morning awakening time, sleep duration and quality, weekdays, work schedule, adherence to sampling procedure).
The total cortisol amount excreted in the awakening period was positively associated with the job strain measures (high strain vs. low strain: 1.4 (2.4–0.3) nmol/l). In contrast, individuals scoring higher in effort-reward imbalance at work had both lower cortisol awakening response (high imbalance vs. low imbalance: −0.7 (−1.3 to −0.2) nmol/l) and lower diurnal secretory activity (−9.2 (−17.7 to −0.7) nmol/l). Gender, weekday and adherence to sampling schedule significantly influenced the cortisol excretion in the morning period.
Our results indicate that the two work stress models differentially affect salivary cortisol output. This finding suggests that combining the information from two complementary job stress models results in improved knowledge on the psychobiological correlates of the psychosocial work environment.
KeywordsJob demand-control model Effort-reward imbalance model Salivary cortisol Psychosocial hazards
This study was supported by Telecom Italia Group. All of the authors exclude any competing interest.
- Bonde JPE (2008) Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.038430
- Karasek RA, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic, New York, p 348Google Scholar
- Kudielka BM, Wust S (2008) The cortisol awakening response (CAR): a useful tool for ambulant assessment of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. In: Columbus F (ed) Circadian rhythms and health research trends. NOVA Science Publishers Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Siegrist J (1998) Adverse health effects of effort-reward imbalance at work: theory, empirical support, and implications for prevention. In: Cooper C (ed) Theories of organizational stress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 190–204Google Scholar
- Siegrist J, Klein D, Voigt KH (1997) Linking sociological with physiological data: the model of effort-reward imbalance at work. Acta Physiol Scand 161:112–116Google Scholar
- Steptoe A, Wardle J, Lipsey Z, Mills R, Oliver G, Jarvis M, Kirschbaum C (1998) A longitudinal study of work load and variations in psychological well-being, cortisol, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Ann Behav Med 20:84–91Google Scholar
- Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- Wust S, Wolf J, Hellhammer DH, Federenko I, Schommer N, Kirscbaum C (2000) The cortisol awakening response-normal values and confounds. Noise Health 7:77–85Google Scholar