Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health?
- 1.4k Downloads
The primary aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether working despite illness, so called “sickness presenteeism”, has an impact on the future general health of two different working populations during a follow-up period of 3 years.
The study was based on two bodies of data collected at a number of Swedish workplaces from 1999 to 2003. The first material comprised 6,901 employees from the public sector and the second 2,862 subjects from the private sector. A comprehensive survey was issued three times: at baseline, after 18 months and after 3 years. Apart from the explanatory variable sickness presenteeism, several potential confounders were considered. The outcome variable was good/excellent versus fair/poor self-reported health.
Sickness presenteeism at baseline was consistently found to heighten the risk of fair/poor health at both the 18-month and 3-year follow ups even after adjusting for the detected confounders.
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to show that sickness presenteeism appears to be an independent risk factor for future fair/poor general health.
KeywordsSickness presenteeism Prospective studies Health status Risk factors Workplace
We are grateful to the project groups in the HAKuL and AHA studies who have been indispensable in the completion of these studies. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of AFA-sjukförsäkring and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS), Stockholm, Sweden.
Conflict of interest statement
- Bergstrom G, Bjorklund C, Fried I, Lisspers J, Nathell L, Hermansson U et al (2008) A comprehensive workplace intervention and its outcome with regard to lifestyle, health and sick leave: the AHA study. Work 31(2):167–180Google Scholar
- Bergström G, Bodin L, Hagberg J, Aronsson G, Josephson M (2009) Sickness presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism. J Environ Occup Med 51 (in press)Google Scholar
- Burell G (2002) Is it possible to change stress-related behaviour? (In Swedish). In: Leander (ed) Rushed, beleaguered—burned out? Researchers discuss strategies to cope with harmful stress. Swedish Research Council, Stockholm, pp 55–69Google Scholar
- Dallner M, Elo A-L Gamberale F, Hottinen V, Knardahl S, Lindström K, Skogstad A, Orhede E (2000) Validation of the general nordic questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nord 2000:12. Nordic Council of Ministers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Frank O (2000) Structural plots of multivariate binary data. J Soc Biol Struct 1:1–19Google Scholar
- Hemp P (2004) Presenteeism: at work—but out of it. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):49–58, 155Google Scholar
- Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
- McKevitt C, Morgan M, Dundas R, Holland WW (1997) Sickness absence and ‘working through’ illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med 19(3):295–300Google Scholar
- Munir F, Yarker J, Haslam C (2007) Sickness absence management: encouraging attendance or ‘risk-taking’ presenteeism in employees with chronic illness? Disabil Rehabil 30(19):1461–1472Google Scholar
- Vroome Ernest de (2006) Prevalence of sickness absence and “presenteeism”. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/2006/07/NL0607019I.htm