Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To psychometrically evaluate a Swedish version of the Quick Environment Exposure Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI), originally developed in the United States, which is a sensitive and fast questionnaire instrument with five scales used to investigate chemical intolerance.

Methods

Ninety non-intolerant, 67 mildly intolerant, and 126 moderately/severely intolerant individuals to environmental chemicals responded at test and retest (n = 69, 64, 120, respectively) occasions to the Swedish version of the QEESI.

Results

Good internal consistency (α = 0.74–0.95) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.78–0.93) was found in all scales, except for the internal consistency in the Masking Index (Kuder-Richardson coefficient = 0.10). All scales, but the Masking Index, further showed good convergent validity (somewhat lower in the Other Intolerences scale) and predominantly unidimensionality.

Conclusions

The Swedish version of the QEESI is reliable and valid for investigation of chemical intolerance, but the Masking Index scale does not represent a unified concept of exposure to masking agents.

Keywords

Chemical intolerance Symptoms Exposure Quality of life Odor Trigeminal 

References

  1. Andersson L, Johansson Å, Millqvist E, Nordin S, Bende M (2008) Prevalence and risk factors for chemical sensitivity and sensory hyperreactivity in teenagers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 211:690–697. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford NA, Miller CS (1998) Environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory: chemical exposure: low levels and high stakes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg ND, Linneberg A, Dirksen A, Elberling J (2008) Prevalence of self-reported symptoms and consequences related to inhalation to airborne chemicals in a Danish general population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:881–887. doi:10.1007/s00420-007-0282-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caress SM, Steinemann AC (2003) A review of a two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities. Environ Health Perspect 111:1490–1497Google Scholar
  5. Cullen M (1987) The worker with multiple chemical sensitivities: an overview. Occup Med 2:655–661Google Scholar
  6. Furberg H, Lichtenstein P, Pedersen NL, Thornton L, Bulik CM, Lerman C, Sullivan PF (2008) The STAGE cohort: a prospective study of tobacco use among Swedish twins. Nicotine Tob Res 10:1727–1735. doi:10.1080/14622200802443551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hausteiner C, Bornschein S, Hansen J, Zilker T, Förstl H (2005) Self-reported chemical sensitivity in Germany: a population-based study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 208:271–278. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hojo S, Kumano H, Yoshino H, Kakuta K, Ishikawa S (2003) Application of Quick Environment Exposure Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI) for Japanese population: study of reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Toxicol Ind Health 19:41–49. doi:10.1191/0748233703th180oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hojo S, Ishikawa S, Kumano H, Miyata M, Sakabe K (2008) Clinical characteristics of physician-diagnosed patients with multiple chemical sensitivity in Japan. Int J Hyg Environ Health 211:682–689. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) (1996) Conclusions and recommendations of a workshop on “multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS), Feb. 21–23, Berlin, Germany. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 24(Suppl):S188–S189. doi:10.1006/rtph.1996.0095 Google Scholar
  11. Ishikawa S, Miyata M (1999) Multiple chemical sensitivity-criteria and test methods for diagnosis. Allergol Immunol 6:990–998Google Scholar
  12. Johansson Å, Brämerson A, Millqvist E, Nordin S, Bende M (2005) Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported odor intolerance: the Skövde population-based study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:559–564. doi:10.1007/s00420-005-0616-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansson Å, Millqvist E, Nordin S, Bende M (2006) Relationship between self-reported odor intolerance and sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin: proposed definition of airway sensory hyperreactivity and estimation of its prevalence. Chest 129:1623–1628. doi:10.1378/chest.129.6.1623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreutzer R, Neutra RR, Lashuay N (1999) Prevalence of people reporting sensitivities to chemicals in the general population. Am J Epidemiol 150:1–12Google Scholar
  15. Manabe R, Kunugita N, Katoh T, Kuroda Y, Akiyama Y, Yamano Y, Uchiyama I, Arashidani K (2008) Questionnaire survey of workers in specific buildings regarding multiple chemical sensitivity. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 63:717–723. doi:10.1265/jjh.63.717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meggs WJ, Dunn KA, Bloch RM, Goodman PE, Davidoff AL (1996) Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health 53:275–282Google Scholar
  17. Miller C (1997) Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance—an emerging theory of disease. Environ Health Perspect 105(suppl 2):445–453. doi:10.2307/3433351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller CS (2001a) Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance. J Nutr Environ Med 11:181–204. doi:10.1080/13590840120088056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller CS (2001b) The compelling anomaly of chemical intolerance. Ann NY Acad Sci 933:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller CS, Prihoda TJ (1999a) The Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Ind Health 15:370–385Google Scholar
  21. Miller CS, Prihoda TJ (1999b) A controlled comparison of symptoms and chemical intolerances reported by Gulf War veterans, implant recipients and persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health 15:386–397Google Scholar
  22. Nordin S, Millqvist E, Löwhagen O, Bende M (2003) The chemical sensitivity scale: psychometric properties and comparison with the noise sensitivity scale. J Environ Psychol 23:357–365. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nordin S, Bende M, Millqvist E (2004) Normative data for the chemical sensitivity scale. J Environ Psychol 24:399–403. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00074-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineÖrebro University HospitalÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations