The influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users

  • Ewa Wigaeus Tornqvist
  • Mats Hagberg
  • Maud Hagman
  • Eva Hansson Risberg
  • Allan Toomingas
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users.

Methods

The study is a prospective cohort study with an observation period of 10 months. A baseline questionnaire about symptoms in the neck, shoulder and arm/hand during previous month, individual factors, work content, physical and psychosocial work-related exposures was answered by 1,283 computer operators (response rate 84%). Incidence data were collected by ten monthly questionnaires regarding the occurrence of symptoms categorized into three gross body regions: neck, shoulders and arms/hands. A case, in the specific gross body region, was defined as a subject who was classified as non-symptomatic in that region at baseline or during minimum one follow-up period and later reported symptoms (≥3 days). Univariable and multivariable incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals for first occurrence of neck, shoulder and arm/hand cases, respectively, were calculated with Cox regression analysis.

Results

The incidence rate was 67, 41 and 47 cases per 100 person years for neck, shoulder and arm/hand symptoms, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, comfort of the computer work environment and gender were related to the incidence of symptoms in all body regions (RR = 1.5–1.9 for low comfort and 1.8–2.1 for females, respectively). Duration of mouse use predicted arm/hand symptoms (RR = 1.7 for ≥3 h/day) and job strain (high demands and low decision latitude) predicted neck symptoms (RR = 1.6 and 2.2 for medium and high strain, respectively). Additionally, age was related to neck and shoulder symptoms.

Conclusion

Preventive strategies to reduce neck and upper limb symptoms among computer users should include measures to reduce mouse use, to increase the comfort of the work environment and to reduce job strain. Although the effect estimates were relatively weak to moderate, preventive measures may have a marked impact on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms in the general population because of the widespread use of computers in working life as well as at home.

Keywords

Computer work Incidence rate ratios Musculoskeletal symptoms Prospective cohort study Work-related risk factors 

References

  1. Andersen JH, Thomsen JF, Overgaard E, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Vilstrup I, Kryger AI, Mikkelsen S (2003) Computer use and carpal tunnel syndrome: a 1-year follow-up study. JAMA 289(22):2963–2969. doi:10.1001/jama.289.22.2963 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen JH, Harhoff M, Grimstrup S, Vilstrup I, Lassen CF, Brandt LPA, Kryger AI, Overgaard E, Hansen KD, Mikkelsen S (2008) Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup Environ Med 65(2):126–131. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.033506 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2002) Duration of computer use and mouse use in relation to musculoskeletal disorders of neck or upper limb. Int J Ind Ergon 30:295–306. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00132-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den Heuvel S, Blatter BM (2006) Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil 16(3):279–302. doi:10.1007/s10926-006-9044-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt LP, Andersen JH, Lassen CF, Kryger A, Overgaard E, Vilstrup I, Mikkelsen S (2004) Neck and shoulder symptoms and disorders among Danish computer workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 30(5):399–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekman A, Andersson A, Hagberg M, Hjelm EW (2000) Gender differences in musculoskeletal health of computer and mouse users in the Swedish workforce. Occup Med (Lond) 50(8):608–613Google Scholar
  7. Faucett J, Rempel D (1996) Musculoskeletal symptoms related to video display terminal use. An analysis of objective and subjective exposure estimates. AAOHN J 44:33–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogelman M, Lewis R (2002) Factors associated with self-reported musculoskeletal discomfort in video display terminal (VDU) users. Int J Ind Ergon 29:311–318. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00071-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, Gentry E, Ortiz DJ, Monteilh C (2002) A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 41(4):221–235. doi:10.1002/ajim.10066 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagberg M, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Toomingas A (2002) Self-reported reduced productivity due to musculoskeletal symptoms: associations with workplace and individual factors among white-collar computer users. J Occup Rehabil 12(3):151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagberg M, Vilhemsson R, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Toomingas A (2007) Incidence of self-reported reduced productivity owing to musculoskeletal symptoms: association with workplace and individual factors among computer users. Ergonomics 50(11):1820–1834. doi:10.1080/00140130701674539 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallin RG (2003) Smärta mer smärtsam hos kvinnor. Genusperspektiv eftersatt i forskning om smärtans biologiska mekanismer (in Swedish) (Pain more painful in women. Gender perspective neglected in research on the biological mechanisms of pain). Lakartidningen 100(46):3738–3741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinrich J, Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2004) A comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load and duration of computer use. Occup Environ Med 61(12):1027–1031. doi:10.1136/oem.2004.013219 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellström B, Lundberg U (2000) Pain perception to the cold pressor test during the menstrual cycle in relation to estrogen levels and a comparison with men. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 35(2):132–141. doi:10.1007/BF02688772 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Homan MM, Armstrong TJ (2003) Evaluation of three methodologies for assessing work activity during computer use. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 64(1):48–55. doi:10.1080/15428110308984784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IJmker S, Huysmans MA, Blatter BM, van der Beek AJ, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM (2007) Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med 64(4):211–222. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.026468 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen C (2003) Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 29(3):197–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen C, Finsen L, Sogaard K, Christensen H (2002a) Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer work and mouse use. Int J Ind Ergon 30:265–275. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00130-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen C, Ryholt C, Burr H, Villadsen E, Christensen H (2002b) Work-related psychosocial, physical and individual factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms in computer users. Work Stress 16(2):107–120. doi:10.1080/02678370210140658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C (2005) Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the “BIT” follow up study on office workers. Occup Environ Med 62(3):188–194. doi:10.1136/oem.2004.013920 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Juul-Kristensen B, Sogaard K, Stroyer J, Jensen C (2004) Computer users’ risk factors for developing shoulder, elbow and back symptoms. Scand J Work Environ Health 30(5):390–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karasek R (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308. doi:10.2307/2392498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlqvist LK, Hagberg M, Koster M, Wenemark M, Ånell R (1996) Musculoskeletal symptoms among computer-assisted design (CAD) operators and evaluation of a self-assessment questionnaire. Int J Occup Environ Health 2(3):185–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karlqvist L, Bernmark E, Ekenvall L, Hagberg M, Isaksson A, Rostö T (1999) Computer mouse and trackball operation: similarities and differences in posture, muscular load and perceived exertion. Int J Ind Ergon 23:157–169. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00031-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karlqvist L, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Hagberg M, Hagman M, Toomingas A (2002) Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms: a cross-sectional study focussing on gender differences. Int J Ind Ergon 30:277–294. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00131-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korhonen T, Ketola R, Toivonen R, Luukkonen R, Hakkanen M, Viikari-Juntura E (2003) Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup Environ Med 60(7):475–482. doi:10.1136/oem.60.7.475 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kryger AI, Andersen JH, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Vilstrup I, Overgaard E, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S (2003) Does computer use pose an occupational hazard for forearm pain; from the NUDATA study. Occup Environ Med 60(11):e14. doi:10.1136/oem.60.11.e14 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lassen CF, Mikkelsen S, Kryger AI, Brandt LP, Overgaard E, Thomsen JF, Vilstrup I, Andersen JH (2004) Elbow and wrist/hand symptoms among 6, 943 computer operators: a 1-year follow-up study (the NUDATA study). Am J Ind Med 46(5):521–533. doi:10.1002/ajim.20081 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindegård A, Karlberg C, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Toomingas A, Hagberg M (2005) Concordance between VDU-users’ ratings of comfort and perceived exertion with experts’ observations of workplace layout and working postures. Appl Ergon 36:319–325. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundberg U (2002) Psychophysiology of work: stress, gender, endocrine response, and work-related upper extremity disorders. Am J Ind Med 41(5):383–392. doi:10.1002/ajim.10038 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz DJ, Gentry E, Cohen S, Edwards A, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D (2002) A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 41(4):236–249. doi:10.1002/ajim.10067 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melin B, Wigaeus Tornqvist E (2005) Are psychosocial working conditions related to neck- and shoulder pain? In: Gustafsson R, Lundberg I (eds) Worklife and Health in Sweden 2004. National institute for Working Life, Swedish Work Environment Authority, Stockholm, pp 131–157Google Scholar
  33. Mikkelsen S, Vilstrup I, Lassen CF, Kryger AI, Thomsen JF, Andersen JH (2007) Validity of questionnaire self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a four-week period. Occup Environ Med 64(8):541–547. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.026351 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norman K, Nilsson T, Hagberg M, Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Toomingas A (2004) Working conditions and health among female and male employees at a call center in Sweden. Am J Ind Med 46:55–62. doi:10.1002/ajim.20039 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norman K, Floderus B, Hagman M, Toomingas A, Wigaeus Tornqvist E (2008) Musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work exposures at call centre companies in Sweden. Work 30:201–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Palm P, Hansson Risberg E, Mortimer M, Palmerud G, Toomingas A, Wigaeus Tornqvist E (2007) Computer use, neck and upper extremity symptoms, eyestrain, and headache among female and male upper secondary school students. Scand J Work Environ Health Suppl 3:33–41Google Scholar
  37. Rempel DM, Krause N, Goldberg R, Benner D, Hudes M, Goldner GU (2006) A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain and incident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators. Occup Environ Med 63(5):300–306. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.022285 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern Epidemilology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, PhiladelpiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MH (2001) Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 27(Suppl 1):1–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Theorell T (1996) Possible mechanisms behind the relationship between the demand-control-support model and disorders from the locomotor system. In: Moon SD, Sauter SL (eds) Beyond biomechanics. Psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 65–73Google Scholar
  41. Theorell T, Perski A, Akerstedt T, Sigala F, Ahlberg-Hulten G, Svensson J, Eneroth P (1988) Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state. A longitudinal study. Scand J Work Environ Health 14(3):189–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Toomingas A, Theorell T, Michélsen H, Nordemar R, Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group (1997) Associations between self-rated psychosocial work conditions and musculoskeletal symptoms and signs. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(2):130–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Veierstedt KB, Nordberg T, Waerstedt M (2006) A critical review for a causal relationship between computer work and musculoskeletal disorders with physical findings of the neck and upper extremitiy. Dansk Selskab for Arbejds- og Miljomedicin (DASAM), CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  44. Wahlström J, Svensson J, Hagberg M, Johnson P (2000) Differences between work methods and gender in computer muse use. Scand J Work Environ Health 26(5):390–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Kilbom Å, Vingård E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Theorell T, Waldenström M, Wiktorin C, Hogstedt C, MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group (2001) The influence on seeking care because of neck and shoulder disorders from work-related exposures. Epidemiology 12(5):537–545. doi:10.1097/00001648-200109000-00013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Work Environment Authority Statistics Sweden (2008) Arbetsmiljön 2007 (in Swedish) (The Work Environment in 2007). Work Environment Authority, Statistics Sweden, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ewa Wigaeus Tornqvist
    • 1
  • Mats Hagberg
    • 2
  • Maud Hagman
    • 3
  • Eva Hansson Risberg
    • 4
  • Allan Toomingas
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Technology and HealthThe Royal Institute of TechnologyHuddingeSweden
  2. 2.Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Occupational and Environmental MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.The Swedish National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental Ill-Health (NASP)Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Health Care AdministrationStockholm County CouncilStockholmSweden
  5. 5.The Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations