A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance
- 2.9k Downloads
We evaluate psychometric properties of a short version of the original effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. This measure is of interest in the context of assessing stressful work conditions in the era of economic globalization.
In a representative sample of 10,698 employed men and women participating in the longitudinal Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in Germany, a short version of the ERI questionnaire was included in the 2006 panel wave. Structural equation modeling and logistic regression analysis were applied.
In addition to satisfactory internal consistency of scales, a model representing the theoretical structure of the scales provided the best data fit in a competitive test (RMSEA = 0.059, CAIC = 4124.19). Scoring high on the ERI scales was associated with elevated risks of poor self-rated health.
This short version of the ERI questionnaire reveals satisfactory psychometric properties, and can be recommended for further use in research and practice.
KeywordsEffort Reward imbalance Psychometric properties Short version Work stress Economic globalization
- Antoniou ASG, Cooper CC (eds) (2005) Research companion to organizational health psychology. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Boomsma A, Hoogland JJ (2001) The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In: Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sörbom D (eds) Structural equation models: present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling With AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Cartwright S, Cooper CC (eds) (2008) The Oxford handbook of organizational well being. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hu L-T, Bentler P (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Structural equation modeling. concepts, issues and applications. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Marcoulides GA, Hershberger SL (1997) Multivariate statistical methods: a first course. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- Moutsatsos E (2008) Economic globalization and its effects on labor. In: Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NYGoogle Scholar
- Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Perrewe PL, Ganster DC (eds) (2002) Historical and current perspectives on stress and health. JAI Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) (2008) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NYGoogle Scholar
- Siegrist J, Theorell T (2006) Socioeconomic position and health. The role of work and employment. In: Siegrist J, Marmot M (eds) Social inequalities in health: new evidence and policy implications. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Starke D, Niedhammer I (2002) Gender and effort-reward imbalance at work. In: Wamala SP, Lynch J (eds) Gender and social inequities in health. Lund, StudentlitteraturGoogle Scholar
- Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RMT, Sarchielli G Bonfiglioli, Mattioli S, Violante FS (2008) Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6
- The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) http://www.diw.de/soep. Accessed 28. Oct 2008
- Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Pentti J, Linna A, Virtanen M, Virtanen P, Ferrie JE (2004) Organisational downsizing, sickness absence, and mortality: 10-town prospective cohort study. BMJ 328:555. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37972.496262.0D
- Weiner H (1992) Perturbing the organism. The biology of stressful experience. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar