Cancer mortality and oil production in the Amazon Region of Ecuador, 1990–2005

Original Article



To compare cancer mortality rates in Amazon cantons (counties) with and without long-term oil exploration and extraction activities.


Mortality (1990 through 2005) and population census (1990 and 2001) data for cantons in the provinces of the northern Amazon Region (Napo, Orellana, Sucumbios, and Pastaza), as well as the province with the capital city of Quito (Pichincha province) were obtained from the National Statistical Office of Ecuador, Instituto Nacional del Estadistica y Censos (INEC). Age- and sex-adjusted mortality rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated to evaluate total and cause-specific mortality in the study regions.


Among Amazon cantons with long-term oil extraction, activities there was no evidence of increased rates of death from all causes (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.95–1.01) or from overall cancer (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.73–0.92), and relative risk estimates were also lower for most individual site-specific cancer deaths. Mortality rates in the Amazon provinces overall were significantly lower than those observed in Pichincha for all causes (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.81–0.83), overall cancer (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.43–0.49), and for all site-specific cancers.


In regions with incomplete cancer registration, mortality data are one of the few sources of information for epidemiologic assessments. However, epidemiologic assessments in this region of Ecuador are limited by underreporting, exposure and disease misclassification, and study design limitations. Recognizing these limitations, our analyses of national mortality data of the Amazon Region in Ecuador does not provide evidence for an excess cancer risk in regions of the Amazon with long-term oil production. These findings were not consistent or supportive of earlier studies in this region that suggested increased cancer risks.


Epidemiology Petroleum Neoplasms Mortality South America 


  1. Abeloff, M.D., et al., (eds.) (2004) Clinical Oncology. Elsevier Chuchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, 3205.Google Scholar
  2. Arana A, Arellano F (2007) Cancer incidence near oilfields in the Amazon basin of Ecuador revisited. Occup Environ Med 64(7):490. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031260 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, B·K., E. White, and R. Saracci (1992) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Monographs on epidemiology and biostatistics, ed. J.L. Kelsey, et al. Vol. 21. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron-Epel O, Kaplan G (2001) Self-reported health status of immigrants from the former Soviet Union in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 3(12):940–946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentham G (1988) Migration and morbidity: implications for geographical studies of disease. Soc Sci Med 26(1):49–54. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(88)90044-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocciolone L et al (1993) Trends in uterine cancer mortality in the Americas, 1955–1988. Gynecol Oncol 51(3):335–344. doi:10.1006/gyno.1993.1300 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch FX et al (2005) Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 9(2):191–211. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2004.12.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosetti C et al (2005) Trends in cancer mortality in the Americas, 1970–2000. Ann Oncol 16(3):489–511. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi086 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordeiro, R., et al. (1999) Validity of information on occupation and principal cause on death certificates in Botucatu, Sao Paulo (in Portuguese). Rev Saude Publica, 1999, pp 499–504.Google Scholar
  10. D’Amico M et al (1999) Ill-defined and multiple causes on death certificates—a study of misclassification in mortality statistics. Eur J Epidemiol 15:141–148. doi:10.1023/A:1007570405888 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Divine BJ, Barron V (1987) Texaco mortality study: III. A cohort study of producing and pipeline workers. Am J Indus Med 11(2):189–202. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700110208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos de Ecuador, Division Politica del Ecuador. 1970–2005, INEC, Quito.Google Scholar
  13. Gissler M, Pakkanen M, Olausson PO (2003) Fertility and perinatal health among Finnish immigrants in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 57(8):1443–1454. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00402-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glass DC et al (2003) Leukemia risk associated with low-level benzene exposure. Epidemiology 14(5):569–577. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000082001.05563.e0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottlieb MS (1980) Lung cancer and the petroleum industry in Louisiana. J Occup Med 22(6):384–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottlieb MS et al (1979) Lung cancer in Louisiana: death certificate analysis. J Nat Cancer Inst 63(5):1131–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gun RT et al (2006) Update of mortality and cancer incidence in the Australian petroleum industry cohort. Occup Environ Med 63(7):476–481. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.023796 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawley GG (1981) The condensed chemical dictionary, 10th edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M (2002a) Gynecologic and breast malignancies in the Amazon basin of Ecuador, 1985–1998. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 76(2):199–201. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00546-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M (2002b) Geographical differences in cancer incidence in the Amazon basin of Ecuador in relation to residence near oil fields. Int J Epidemiol 31(5):1021–1027. doi:10.1093/ije/31.5.1021 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M (2004) Incidence of childhood leukemia and oil exploitation in the Amazon basin of Ecuador. Int J Occup Environ Health 10(3):245–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. International Agency for Research on Cancer (1989) Occupational exposures in petroleum refining: crude oil and major petroleum fuels. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 45, eds. I.A.f.R.o.C. (IARC), vol. 45. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelaher M, Jessop DJ (2002) Differences in low-birthweight among documented and undocumented foreign-born and US-born Latinas. Soc Sci Med 55(12):2171–2175. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00360-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lahti RA, Penttila A (2001) The validity of death certificates: routine validation of death certification and its effects on mortality statistics. Forensic Sci Int 115:15–32. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00300-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu TH et al (2001) Comparison of official coders versus physical panel in assignment of underlying cause of death. J Formos Med Assoc 100:365–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGlynn KA, London WT (2005) Epidemiology and natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 19(1):3–23. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2004.10.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mills PK, Newell GR, Johnson DE (1984) Testicular cancer associated with employment in agriculture and oil and natural gas extraction. Lancet 1(8370):207–210. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(84)92125-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgenstern, H (1998) Ecologic studies, in modern epidemiology, 2nd edn, K.J. Rothman and S. Greenland (eds.) Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  29. Moriyama IM (1989) Problems in measurement of accuracy of cause-of-death statistics. Am J Public Health 79:1349–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Percy C, Stanek E 3rd, Gloeckler L (1981) Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health 71(3):242–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ries L et al (2006) SEER IIew, 1975–2003. National Cancer Institute, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosner B (2000) Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  33. Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  34. San Sebastian M, Hurtig AK (2004) Cancer among indigenous people in the Amazon basin of Ecuador, 1985–2000. Rev Panam Salud Publica 16:328–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. San Sebastian M et al (2001) Exposures and cancer incidence near oil fields in the Amazon basin of Ecuador. Occup Environ Med 58(8):517–522. doi:10.1136/oem.58.8.517 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sewell CM et al (1986) Testicular cancer and employment in agriculture and oil and natural gas extraction. Lancet 1(80):553. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90902-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siemiatycki J (2002) Commentary: epidemiology on the side of the angels. Int J Epidemiol 31(5):1027–1029. doi:10.1093/ije/31.5.1027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siemiatycki J et al (1987) Associations between several sites of cancer and twelve petroleum-derived liquids. Results from a case-referent study in Montreal. Scand J Work Environ Health 13(6):493–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Silvi, J (2003) On the estimation of mortality rates for countries of the Americas, in epidemiological bulletin. Pan American Health Organization, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  40. Smith Sehdev AE, Hutchins GM (2001) Problems with proper completion and accuracy of the cause-of-death statement. Arch Intern Med 161:277–284. doi:10.1001/archinte.161.2.277 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tong S (2000) Migration bias in ecologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol 16(4):365–369. doi:10.1023/A:1007698700119 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wakefield J (2008) Ecologic studies revisited. Annu Rev Public Health 29:75–90. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090821 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wong O, Raabe GK (1995) Cell-type-specific leukemia analyses in a combined cohort of more than 208, 000 petroleum workers in the United States and the United Kingdom, 1937–1989. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 21(2):307–321. doi:10.1006/rtph.1995.1044 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wong O, Raabe GK (2000) A critical review of cancer epidemiology in the petroleum industry, with a meta-analysis of a combined database of more than 350, 000 workers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 32:78–98. doi:10.1006/rtph.2000.1410 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization (1994) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Kelsh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Libby Morimoto
    • 1
  • Edmund Lau
    • 1
  1. 1.Exponent Health SciencesMenlo ParkUSA
  2. 2.UCLA School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations