Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study
- 1.3k Downloads
To estimate the prevalence of bullying and to identify risk groups in a representative population sample.
The data for this study was taken from the second Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Study (DPWES). The sample consisted of 3,429 employees between 20 and 59-years. The response rate for the study was 60.4%.
The study showed that 8.3% of the respondents had been bullied within the past year, 1.6% of the sample reported daily to weekly bullying. Co-workers (71.5%) and managers/supervisors (32.4%) were most often reported as perpetrators of bullying, but bullying from subordinates (6%) was also reported. We found significant differences in the prevalence of bullying for both occupational status and work process, a variable characterizing the employees main task in their job. Unskilled workers reported the highest prevalence of bullying, while managers/supervisors the lowest prevalence. People working with things (male-dominated occupations) and people working with clients/patients (female-dominated occupations) reported higher prevalence of bullying than people working with symbols or customers. No significant gender or age differences were found.
These findings suggest that types of work and gender ratio are risk factors in the onset of workplace bullying. Future studies should take into account the type of work and the gender ratio of the organization.
KeywordsWorkplace bullying Population study Gender ratio Work characteristics Occupations
- Cowie H, Jennifer D, Neto C, Angulo JC, Pereira B, Del Barrio C, et al. Sheehan, M.; Ramsey, S.; Patrick, J. (2000) Comparing the nature of workplace bullying in two European countries: Portugal and UK. Transcending boundaries: integrating people, processes and systems, Brisbane, 6-9-2000Google Scholar
- Dansk fagkode (The Danish job classification) (1986) The Directorate of Labour, Copenhagen. på NFAGoogle Scholar
- Dansk Branchekode (2003) DB03 Danish Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities 2003 (in danish). Danmarks Statistik (Statistics Denmark), Copenhagen 2002. på NFAGoogle Scholar
- Einarsen S (1996) Bullying and harassment at work: epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. University of Bergen, Afhandlingen haves.Google Scholar
- Einarsen S, Zapf D (2003) Individual antecedents of bullying: victims and perpetrators. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice.. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 165–184Google Scholar
- Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–30.Google Scholar
- Hoel H, Cooper CL (2000) Destructive conflict and bullying at work. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
- Hoel H, Einarsen S, Keashley L, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) Bullying at work. The way forward. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 412–416Google Scholar
- Hofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organzations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Leymann H (1992) Vuxenmobbning på svenska arbetsplatser. Stockholm: Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen; Report No.: 1. kopiGoogle Scholar
- Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S (2007) Economic activities and occupations at high risk for workplace bullying: results from a large-scale cross-sectional survey in the general working population in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:346–353. doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0139-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rayner C, Keashly L (2005) Bullying at work: a perspective from Britain and North America. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 271–296Google Scholar
- Rayner C, Hoel H, Cooper CL (2002) Workplace bullying. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Thorsted BL (2007) Forskerbeskyttelse i CPR. Det 29. symposium i anvendt statistikÅrhus Universitet: Danmarks Statistik van der Zouwen, J. and de Leeuw, E. D. (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60Google Scholar
- van der Zouwen J, de Leeuw ED (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60Google Scholar
- Vartia M (2003) Workplace bullying—a study on the work environment, well-being and health. Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthGoogle Scholar
- Zapf D, Einarsen S (2005) Mobbing at work: escalated conflicts in organizations. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 237–270Google Scholar
- Zapf D, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2003) Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace international perspectives in research and practice, 1st edn edn. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 103–126Google Scholar