Associations of job, living conditions and lifestyle with occupational injury in working population: a population-based study

  • N. Chau
  • E. Bourgkard
  • A. Bhattacherjee
  • J. F. Ravaud
  • M. Choquet
  • J. M. Mur
  • The Lorhandicap Group
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the roles of job demands, living conditions and lifestyle in occupational injury.

Methods

The sample included 2,888 workers, aged ≥15 years, randomly selected from the north-eastern France. The subjects completed a mailed questionnaire. Data were analyzed with adjusted odds ratios (ORa) computed with the logistic model.

Results

In total, 9.2% of workers had an injury during the previous 2 years. The high job demands: tasks at height, handling objects, pneumatic tools, other vibrating hand tools, work in adverse climate, physical workload, vibrating platform, machine tools, cold, heat, awkward posture, noise, hammer, and pace had crude odds ratios between 1.81 and 5.25 for injury. A strong exposure–response relationship was found between the cumulated job demands (CJD, defined by their number) and injury: OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.23–2.87) for CJD1, 4.39 (2.98–4.46) for CJD2–3, and 9.93 (6.70–14.7) for CJD ≥ 4, versus CJD0. These ORs decreased to 1.68, 3.70, and 7.15 respectively, when adjusted for sex, age, and living conditions/lifestyle confounders; and to 1.54, 2.99, and 5.45 respectively when also adjusted for job category. The following factors had significant ORa: age <30 years (1.54, 1.12–2.12), male (1.64, 1.18–2.30), smoking (1.60, 1.22–2.10), musculoskeletal disorders (1.54, 1.17–2.04), and frequent drug use for fatigue (2.03, 1.17–3.53). The workmen, farmers/craftsmen/tradesmen, and foremen had a 5.7–8.7-fold while the clerks and technicians a 2.7–3.6-fold higher risk compared with upper class. The risk associated with CJD was twofold higher among the workers aged ≥40 or with frequent drug use for fatigue compared with the others. Obesity had ORa 2.05 (1.11–3.78) among the subjects aged ≥40, and excess alcohol use had ORa 2.44 (1.26–4.72) among those free of disease.

Conclusions

This study identified a wide range of job demands and living conditions/lifestyle which predicted injury. Preventive measures should be conducted to reduce job demands and to help workers to be aware of the risk and to improve their living conditions/lifestyle.

Keywords

Occupational accident Job Living conditions Lifestyle Diseases Disabilities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank D Saouag, M Weiss, M Depesme-Cuny, and B Phélut for their help in the study. The work is granted by the Pôle Européen de Santé.

References

  1. Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Kecklund G (2004) Mental fatigue, work and sleep. J Psychosom Res 57:427–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronne LJ (2002) Classification of obesity and assessment of obesity-related health risks. Obes Res 10(Suppl 2):105s–105sPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudier F, Arène J (1997) Baromètre santé adultes 95/96. Editions CFES, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacherjee A, Chau N, Otero Sierra C, Legras B, Benamghar L, Michaely JP, Ghosh AK, Guillemin F, Ravaud JF, Mur JM, Lorhandicap group (2003) Relationships of job and some individual characteristics to occupational injuries in employed people: a community-based study. J Occup Health 45:382–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caisse nationale de l’assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS) (2002) Statistiques financières et technologiques des accidents du travail—1998–2000. CNAMTS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Challier B, Chau N, Predine R, Choquet M, Legras B (2000) Associations of family environment and individual factors with tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug uses in adolescents. Eur J Epidemiol 16:33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chau N, Mur JM, Benamghar L, Siegfried C, Dangelzer JL, Français M, Jacquin R, Sourdot A (2004a) Relationships between certain individual characteristics and occupational accidents for various jobs in the construction industry: a case-control study. Am J Ind Med 45:84–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chau N, Mur JM, Touron C, Benamghar L, Dehaene D (2004b) Correlates of occupational injuries for various jobs in railway workers: a case-control study. J Occup Health 46:272–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chau N, Bhattacherjee A, Bertrand JP, Meyer JP, Guillemin F, Ravaud JF, Ghosh AK, Mur JM, Lorhandicap group (2005a) Associations of occupational hazards and individual characteristics with occupational injuries and disabilities in Lorraine coal miners. In: International symposium on advances in mining technology and management, Kharagpur, 30 November–2 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  10. Chau N, Ravaud JF, Otero Sierra C, Legras B, Macho J, Guillemin F, Sanchez J, Mur JM, Groupe Lorhandicap (2005b) Prevalence of impairments and social inequalities: a community-based study in Lorraine. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publ 53:1–15Google Scholar
  11. Chau N, Gauchard G, Dehaene D, Benamghar L, Touron C, Perrin P, Mur JM (2007) Contributions of occupational hazards and human factors in occupational injuries and their associations with job, age and type of injuries in railway workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:517–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cicconetti P, Riolo N, Priami C, Tafaro L, Ettore E (2004) Risk factors for cognitive impairment. Recenti Prog Med 95:535–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohidon C, Alla F, Chau N, Michaely JP, groupe Lorhandicap (2005) Tabac, alcool et médicaments psychotropes en Lorraine—Enquête épidémiologique en population générale. Sante Publique 17:325–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators (2004) Psychotropic drug utilization in Europe: results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project Acta Psychiatr Scand 109(Suppl 420):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etter JF, Pernejer TV (1997) Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1123–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falissard B (1998) Comprendre et utiliser les statistiques dans les sciences de la vie. 2ème édn. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Froom P, Melamed S, Kristal-Boneh E, Gofer D, Ribak J (1996) Industrial accidents are related to relative body weight: the Israeli CORDIS study. Occup Environ Med 53:832–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauchard G, Chau N, Mur JM, Perrin P (2001) Falls and working individuals: role of extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Ergonomics 44:1330–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gauchard GC, Chau N, Touron C, Benamghar L, Dehaene D, Perrin PP, Mur JM (2003) Individual characteristics in occupational accidents due to imbalance: a case-control study in the employees of a railway company. Occup Environ Med 60:330–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gauchard GC, Deviterne D, Guillemin F, Sanchez J, Perrin P, Mur JM, Ravaud JF, Chau N, Lorhandicap group (2006) Prevalence of sensorial and cognitive disabilities and falls, and their relationships: a community-based study. Neuroepidemiol 26:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghosh AK, Bhattacherjee A, Chau N (2004) Relationships of working conditions and individual characteristics with occupational injuries: a case-control study in coal miners. J Occup Health 46:470–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groupe de recherche Lorhandicap: Chau N, Guillemin F, Sanchez J, Ravaud JF, André JM, Michaely JP, Caria A, Dazord A, Guillaume S, Legras B, Otero Sierra C, Meyer JP, Bourgey G, Tubiana-Rufi N, Méjean L, Choquet M, Schléret Y, Ticheur MV, Chantome F, Cnockaert JC, Mur JM (2000) Approches méthodologiques dans une enquête épidémiologique sur les handicaps en Lorraine. Handicap Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales 88:1–23Google Scholar
  23. Harma M, Suvanto S, Popkin S, Pulli K, Mulder M, Hirvonen K (1998) A dose-response study of total sleep time and the ability to maintain wakefulness. J Sleep Res 7:167–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hashimoto H, Nomura K, Yano E (2004) Psychosomatic status affects the relationship between subjective hearing difficulties and the results of audiometry. J Clin Epidemiol 57:381–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffstein V (2002) Relationship between smoking and sleep apnea in clinic population. Sleep 25:519–524Google Scholar
  26. Houtman IL, Goudswaard A, Dhondt S, van der Grinten MP, Hildebrandt VH, van der Poel EG (1998) Dutch monitor on stress and physical load: risk factors, consequences, and preventive action. Occup Environ Med 55:73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE) (1993) Recensement de la population de 1990. Sondage au ¼. INSEE. INSEE, NancyGoogle Scholar
  28. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE) (2006) France métropolitaine—Enquête annuelle de recensement 2004. http://www.insee.fr/fr/recensement/nouv_recens/resultats/repartition/chiffres_cles/national/france-metropolitaine.pdf
  29. Jorgensen K (1998) Concepts of accident analysis. In: International Labour Office (ed) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety. Chapter VIII. Accidents and safety management—accident prevention, vol. 3, 4th edn. ILO, GenovaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalmijn S, Van Boxtel MPJ, Verschuren MWM, Jolles J, Launer LJ (2002) Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption in relation to cognitive performance in middle age. Am J Epidemiol 156:936–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kant IJ, Bültmann U, Schröer KAP, Beurskens AJHM, van Amelsvoort LGPM, Swaen GMH (2003) An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht cohort study. Occup Environ Med 60(Suppl I):i32–i39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kostova V, Koleva M (1999) Back disorders (low back pain, cervicobrachial and lumbosacral radicular syndromes) and some related risk factors. J Neurol Sci 192:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leigh J, Macaskill P, Kuosma E, Mandryk J (1999) Global burden of disease and injury due to occupational factors. Epidemiology 10:626–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis RJ, Friedlander BR, Bhojani FA, Schorr WP, Salatich PG, Lawhorn EG (2002) Reliability and validity of an occupational health history questionnaire. J Occup Environ Med 44:39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorhandicap group: Chau N, Ravaud JF, Bourgkard E, Sanchez J, Choquet M, Meyer JP, Otero Sierra C, Michaely JP, Legras B, Guillemin F, Bhattacherjee A, Guillaume S, Dazord A, Méjean L, Tubiana-Rufi N, Schléret Y, Mur JM (2004) Relationships of demanding work conditions with fatigue and psychosomatic disorders: a community-based study. Occup Environ Med 61:e46–e46Google Scholar
  36. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:69–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McCaig LF, Burt CW, Stussman BJ (1998) A comparison of work-related injury visits and other injury visits to emergency departments in the United States, 1995–1996. J Occup Environ Med 40:870–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melamed S, Yekutieli D, Froom P, Kristal-Boneh E, Ribak J (1999) Adverse work and environmental conditions predict occupational injuries. The Israeli cardiovascular occupational risk factors determination in Israel (CORDIS) study Am J Epidemiol 150:18–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Munoz B, West S, Rubin GS, Schein OD, Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K (1999) Who participates in population based studies of visual impairment? The Salisbury eye evaluation project experience. Ann Epidemiol 9:53–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson HD, Nevitt MC, Scott JC, Stone KL, Cummings SR (1994) Smoking, alcohol, and neuromuscular and physical function of older women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. JAMA 273:1825–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS) (1988) Classification internationale des handicaps: déficiences, incapacités et désavantages. Un manuel de classification des conséquences des maladies. Paris: OMS / CTNERHI / Les Editions INSERMGoogle Scholar
  42. Otero Sierra C, Chau N, Macho JM, Cipponeri S, Guillaume S, Michaely JP, Mur JM, Lorhandicap group (2002) Musculoskeletal disorders for various sociooccupational categories in a French general population: a community-based study. 16th EPICOH. BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  43. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson DA, Ryan DH, Bray GA (2002) Sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and BMI in relation to self-perception of overweight. Obes Res 10:345–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Workers’ health in the region of the Americas (1999) 124th session of the executive committee. Washington, D.C., 21–25 June 1999, http://www.paho.org/English/gov/ce/ce124_18.pdf
  45. Room R, Babor T, Rehm J (2005) Alcohol and public health. Lancet 365:519–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith GS, Veazie MA (1998) Principles of prevention: the public health approach to reducing injuries in the workplace. In: International Labour Office (ed) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety. Chapter VIII. Accidents and safety management—Accident prevention, vol 3, 4th edn. ILO, Genova, pp 56.1–56.42Google Scholar
  47. Sprince NL, Park H, Zwerling C, Lynch CF, Whitten PA, Thu K, Gillette PP, Burmeister LF, Alavanja MC (2002) Risk factors for machinery-related injury among Iowa farmers: a case-control study nested in the agricultural health study. Int J Occup Health 8:332–338Google Scholar
  48. Tianwu H, Watanabe Y, Asai M, Shimizu K, Takada S, Mizukoshi K (1995) Effects of alcohol ingestion on vestibular function in postural control. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 519:127–131Google Scholar
  49. Turvey CL, Schultz S, Arndt S, Wallace RB, Herzog R (2000) Memory complaint in a community sample aged 70 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1435–1441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Tuinen M, Land G (1986) Smoking and excess sick leave in a department of health. J Occup Med 28:33–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wells S, Macdonald S (1999) The relationship between alcohol consumption patterns and car, work, sports and home accidents for different age groups. Accid Anal Prev 31:663–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zwerling C, Whitten PS, Davis CS, Sprince NL (1997) Occupational injuries among workers with disabilities: the national health interview survey, 1985–1994. JAMA 278:2163–2166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Chau
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 8
  • E. Bourgkard
    • 4
  • A. Bhattacherjee
    • 5
  • J. F. Ravaud
    • 6
  • M. Choquet
    • 2
    • 3
    • 7
  • J. M. Mur
    • 4
  • The Lorhandicap Group
  1. 1.INSERM, U669, IFR25-IFRHParisFrance
  2. 2.Univ Paris-Sud, U669ParisFrance
  3. 3.Univ Paris DescartesParisFrance
  4. 4.Département d’Epidémiologie en EntreprisesNational Institute for Research and Safety (INRS), World Health Organization Collaborative CentreVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance
  5. 5.Department of Mining EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  6. 6.INSERM, U750, CERMES, IFR25-IFRHVillejuif, ParisFrance
  7. 7.INSERM, U669ParisFrance
  8. 8.INSERM, U669HeillecourtFrance

Personalised recommendations