Advertisement

Trends in exposure of veterinarians to physical and chemical hazards and use of protection practices

  • Lin FritschiEmail author
  • Adeleh Shirangi
  • Ian D. Robertson
  • Lesley M. Day
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether exposure to physical and chemical occupational hazards and use of protective practices has changed in recent veterinary graduates, and to describe trends in exposure to occupational hazards and use of protective practices over time.

Methods

This paper reports on a retrospective cohort study of veterinarians who graduated from any of the four Australian veterinary schools between 1960 and 2000 and were currently in clinical practice. A self-completed postal questionnaire was used to collect personal details, professional history since graduation, and details of occupational hazards and protective practices used. The prevalence of occupational hazards and use of protective practices was examined by decade of graduation adjusting for gender, type of practice and number of hours worked.

Results

After adjusting for other factors, recent graduates tended to take more X-rays than early graduates—graduates since 1990 were 2.59 times more likely to take more than seven X-rays a week compared with graduates before 1970. Recent graduates were also more likely to personally restrain animals during X-rays but were more likely to use X-ray protection. Of those who undertook surgery, recent graduates were more likely to use anaesthetic waste gas scavengers. Over time, veterinary jobs have become more likely to involve longer hours of surgery, but shorter periods of driving. The use of scavengers for waste anaesthetic gas has increased markedly over time from 3.8% of jobs commencing in the 1960s to over 70% for jobs commencing since 1997.

Conclusions

This survey is, to our knowledge, the first to examine trends in the occupational health and safety practices of veterinarians. We have shown that occupational health issues are still important in veterinary practice, with most veterinarians exposed to a number of physical and chemical hazards and many using inadequate protection.

Keywords

Radiation Occupation Veterinary medicine Anaesthetics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Cancer Council of Western Australia and the University of Western Australia Research Grants. We would like to thank the alumni organisations of Queensland University, Murdoch University and the University of Sydney for providing lists of graduates, the Australian Veterinary Association, the New Zealand Veterinary Registration Board and the veterinary registration boards of the Australian States for their assistance. Lin Fritschi and Lesley Day are supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council.

References

  1. Fritschi L, Day LM, Shirangi A et al. (2006) Injury in Australian veterinarians. Occup Med (Lond) 56:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jacobsen A, Van Farowe DE (1964) Survey of X-ray protection practices among Michigan veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc 145:793–797Google Scholar
  3. Jeyaretnam J, Jones H (2000) Physical, chemical and biological hazards in veterinary practice. Aust Vet J 78:751–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeyaretnam J, Jones H, Phillips M (2000) Disease and injury among veterinarians. Aust Vet J 78:625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Korczynski RE (1999) Anaesthetic gas exposure in veterinary clinics. App Occup Env Hyg 14:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Landercasper J, Cogbill T, Strutt PJ et al. (1988) Trauma and the veterinarian. J Trauma 28:1255–1258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Reijula K, Rasanen K, Hamalainen M et al. (2003) Work environment and occupational health of Finnish veterinarians. Am J Ind Med 44:46–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shirangi A, Fritschi L, Holman CD (2007) Prevalence of occupational exposures and protective practices in Australian female veterinarians. Aust Vet J 85:32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Slater MR, Slater M (2000) Women in veterinary medicine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 217:472–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Torda TA, Jones R, Englert J (1978) A study of waste gas scavenging in operating theatres. Anaesth Intensive Care 6:215–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ward GS, Byland RR (1982) Concentration of halothane in veterinary operating and treatment rooms. J Am Vet Med Assoc 180:174–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wiggins P, Schenker MB, Green R et al. (1989) Prevalence of hazardous exposures in veterinary practice. Am J Ind Med 16:55–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Fritschi
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Adeleh Shirangi
    • 2
  • Ian D. Robertson
    • 3
  • Lesley M. Day
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory for Cancer MedicineWestern Australian Institute for Medical ResearchPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Population HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.School of Veterinary and Biomedical SciencesMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  4. 4.Accident Research CentreMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Western Australian Institute for Medical ResearchNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations