Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home

  • Roger Persson
  • Jonas Björk
  • Jonas Ardö
  • Maria Albin
  • Kristina Jakobsson
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

We examined to what degree annoyance ratings to noise, air pollution and other common environmental factors in the home environment could be considered to mirror personality disposition in terms of habitual anxiety level and, when appropriate, objectively modeled noise and nitrogen emission (NOx).

Methods

A trait anxiety scale was introduced in a cross-sectional public health survey with 2,856 respondents. Of these, 705 had self-reported asthma and the rest constituted gender-matched referents. Annoyance to ten specific factors in the residential environment, mainly focusing on source-specific noise and air pollution, was assessed on a six-point likert scale. A-weighted energy equivalent continuous sound pressure level during a full day (24 h; LAeq,24) as well as annual average NOx levels (μg/m3) at the residential address were modeled with high resolution, using a road data base and a detailed emission data base for NOx.

Results

The two most prevalent complaints were annoyance to traffic noise and sounds from neighbors, which was reported by about 8% of the participants. Unadjusted logistic regression analyses using the continuous trait anxiety score as a predictor showed positive associations with ratings of annoyance from total traffic noise, sounds from neighbors, sound from ventilation, exhaust fumes from traffic, sounds from other installations, and vibrations from traffic (ORs between 1.37 and 2.14). Modeled noise and NOx exposure were positively related with annoyance to traffic noise and exhaust fumes, respectively. Adjustment of the trait anxiety scores for other individual characteristics and potential determinants did not change the overall pattern of results.

Conclusion

Trait anxiety scores were often mirrored in ratings of annoyance, which suggests caution when using annoyance reports either as a surrogate measure for environmental exposure on the individual-level in epidemiologic studies or when studying the moderating effects of annoyance on health outcomes.

Keywords

Asthma Air pollution Noise Noise sensitivity Swedish universities Scales of Personality 

References

  1. Aldwin CM, Levenson MR, Spiro A III, Bosse R (1989) Does emotionality predict stress? Findings from the normative aging study. J Pers Soc Psychol 56:618–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardö J (2005) Traffic, people and the environment in Scania (Trafik, människor och miljö i Skåne; in Swedish). GIS centre at Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  3. Babisch W (1998) Epidemiological studies of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise–a critical appraisal. Noise Health 1:24–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Babisch W, Beule B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H (2005) Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 16:33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendtsen H (1999) The nordic prediction method for road traffic noise. Sci Total Environ 235:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Björk J, Ardö J, Stroh E, Lövkvist H, Östergren PO, Albin M (2006) Road traffic noise in southern Sweden and its relation to annoyance, disturbance of daily activities and health. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:392–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bluhm G, Nordling E, Berglind N (2004) Road traffic noise and annoyance—an increasing environmental health problem. Noise Health 6:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (1987) Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: is the bark worse than the bite? J Pers 55:299–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eysenck M (1997) Anxiety and cognition. A unified theory. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) User’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Gustavsson JP, Bergman H, Edman G, Ekselius L, von Knorring L, Linder J (2000) Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatr Scand 102:217–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunter PR, Davies MA, Hill H, Whittaker M, Sufi F (2003) The prevalence of self-reported symptoms of respiratory disease and community belief about the severity of pollution from various sources. Int J Environ Health Res 13:227–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lessof M (1997) Report of multiple shemical sensitivities (MCS) workshop, Berlin, Germany, 21–23 February 1996. PCS/96.29 IPCS, Geneva, Switzerland. Hum Exp Toxicol 16:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linell A, Thuvander A (2005) Upplevda besvär av luftföroreningar, buller och inomhusmiljö—Socioekonomisk analys baserad på Nationella miljöhälsoenkäten, Statens Folkhälsoinstitut, 12pGoogle Scholar
  15. Miedema HM, Vos H (1998) Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3432–3445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oglesby L, Kunzli N, Monn C, Schindler C, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Leuenberger P (2000) Validity of annoyance scores for estimation of long term air pollution exposure in epidemiologic studies: the Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA). Am J Epidemiol 152:75–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ørbæk P, Persson R, Österberg K (2005) Impact of trait anxiety and social conformity on responses to experimental chemical challenge. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 19:659–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Österberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Carlsson Eek F, Ørbæk P (2007) Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance. Hum Exp Toxicol 26:231–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Persson R, Ørbæk P (2003) The influence of personality traits on neuropsychological test performance and self-reported health and social context in women. Pers Individ Dif 34:295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pieters MS, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Schoemaker HC, Cohen AF (1992) Self-selection for personality variables among healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:101–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Reijneveld SA (1994) The impact of the Amsterdam aircraft disaster on reported annoyance by aircraft noise and on psychiatric disorders. Int J Epidemiol 23:333–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosvall M, Ali Khan F, Nilsson M, Östergren P (2005) Hälsoförhållanden i Skåne. Folhälsoenkät Skåne 2004., Socialmedicinska enheten, Region Skåne, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  23. Schalling D, Åsberg M, Edman G, Oreland L (1987) Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology: temperament traits associated with platelet MAO activity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 76:172–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seeber A, Demes P, Golka K, Kiesswetter E, Schaper M, van Thriel C, Zupanic M (2000) Subjective symptoms due to solvent mixtures, dioxin, and toluene: impact of exposure versus personality factors. Neurotoxicology 21:677–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP (2003) Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. Br Med Bull 68:243–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stroh E, Oudin A, Gustafsson S, Pilesjö P, Harrie L, Stromberg U, Jakobsson K (2005) Are associations between socio-economic characteristics and exposure to air pollution a question of study area size? An example from Scania, Sweden. Int J Health Geogr 4:30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Toren K, Brisman J, Järvholm B (1993) Asthma and asthma-like symptoms in adults assessed by questionnaires. A literature review. Chest 104:600–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Van den Bergh O, Devriese S, Winters W, Veulemans H, Nemery B, Eelen P, Van de Woestijne KP (2001) Acquiring symptoms in response to odors: a learning perspective on multiple chemical sensitivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 933:278–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watson D, Pennebaker JW (1989) Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev 96:234–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. WHO (2003) Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Report on a WHO Working Group, Bonn, Germany, 13–15 JanuaryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Persson
    • 1
  • Jonas Björk
    • 2
  • Jonas Ardö
    • 3
  • Maria Albin
    • 4
  • Kristina Jakobsson
    • 4
  1. 1.National Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Competence Center for Clinical ResearchLund University HospitalLundSweden
  3. 3.Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystems AnalysisLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineLund University HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations