Latex allergy in health care workers in Taiwan: prevalence, clinical features

Short Communication



Latex allergy is becoming a major health concern among healthcare workers, of whom approximately 2.8 to 18% are reportedly sensitized.


The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of a natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy screening program to identify sensitized hospital employees.


Nurses (n = 130) assigned to operating theaters and intensive care units were evaluated using a written questionnaire for symptoms of atopy (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczyma), possible reactions to latex gloves, other medical devices and previous surgery. Serological testing for total immunoglobulin E (IgE), latex-specific IgE, and specific-IgE to melon, banana, kiwi, tomato, and chestnut were performed using Pharmacia CAP radioallergosorbent tests. Skin pick test (SPT) for latex allergen was also performed.


Elevated serum total IgE was found in 22(16.9%) of the 130 nurses, 3(16.7%) of whom had increased latex-specific IgE further confirmed by SPT. The overall prevalence of latex allergy was 2.3% (3/130). No cross reactive fruit-allergy was found among the latex-sensitized nurses.


This study supports the existence of other forms of atopy are related to an increased risk of latex sensitization. The NRL screening program used in this study is feasible for use in identifying latex-sensitized employees


Natural rubber latex Health care workers Fruit allergy 


  1. Agarwal S, Gawkrodger DJ (2002) Latex allergy: a health care problem of epidemic proportions. Eur J Dermatol 12:311–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessio L, Cattaneo R, Coppini C, Placidi D (2001) Exposure to latex in the health setting: practical experience. F Ital Med Lav Ergon 23:60–63Google Scholar
  3. Elliott BA (2002) Latex allergy: the perspective from the surgical suite. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110:S117–S120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Keh C, Soon Y, Wong LS (2000) Latex allergy: an emerging problem in theatres. Int J Clin Pract 54:582–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Larese Filon F, Bosco A, Fiorito A, Negro C, Barbina P (2001) Latex symptoms and sensitization in health care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nettis E, Assennato G, Ferrannini A, Tursi A (2002) Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms. Clin Exp Allergy 32:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Niggemann B, Breiteneder H (2000) Latex allergy in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 121:98–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Patriarca G, Nucera E, Buonomo A, Roncallo C, De Pasquale T, Pollastrini E, Schiavino D (2002) New insights on latex allergy diagnosis and treatment. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 12:169–176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pridgeon C, Wild G, Ashworth F, Egner W, Ward AM (2000) Assessment of latex allergy in a healthcare population: are the available tests valid? Clin Exp Allergy 30:1444–1449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Suli C, Parziale M, Lorini M, De Silva E, Miadonna A, Tedeschi A (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for latex allergy: a cross sectional study on healthcare workers of an Italian hospital. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 14(1):64–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuill GM, Saroya D, Yuill SL (2003) A national survey of provision for patients with latex allergy. Anaesthesia 58:775–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsTaipei City HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of PediatricMin-Sheng General HospitalTao-YuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations