Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported odour intolerance: the Skövde population-based study

  • Å. Johansson
  • A. Brämerson
  • E. Millqvist
  • S. Nordin
  • M. Bende
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the prevalence of odour intolerance in adults with respect to both self-reported general intolerance and affective and behavioural consequences. Furthermore, we aimed to relate odour intolerance to explanatory variables and risk factors. Method: This is a cross-sectional, population-based epidemiological study. A random sample of 1900 inhabitants from the age of 20, stratified for age and gender, were recruited. Subjects were invited for clinical examinations that included questions about general odour intolerance, respiratory symptoms and smoking habits, as well as a smell identification test. The chemical sensitivity scale for sensory hyperreactivity (CSS-SHR) was used to quantify affective and behavioural consequences. Results: In total 1387 volunteers (73% of the sample) were investigated. The overall prevalence of self-reported general odour intolerance was 33% (95% confidence interval (CI): 30–36%), with problems mainly from the upper respiratory tract. The prevalence of affective and behavioural consequences of odour intolerance (CSS-SHR score ≥43) was 19% (95% CI: 15–22%). The risk for the latter condition was increased in women compared with men (odds ratio = 2.3: 95% CI: 1.5–3.6), but no increased risk was found related to current smoking or impaired sense of smell. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that intolerance to odours is a widespread problem in society, and that it is about twice as common in women than in men.

Keywords

Chemical intolerance Olfaction Adults Tobacco smoke Epidemiology 

References

  1. Baldwin CM, Bell IR, O’Rourke MK (1999) Odour sensitivity and respiratory complaint profilesin a community-based sample with asthma, hay fever, and chemical odour intolerance. Toxicol Ind Health 15:403–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell IR, Schwartz GE, Peterson JM, Amend D (1993) Self-reported illness from chemical odors in young adults without clinical syndromes or occupational exposures. Arch Environ Health 48:6–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell M, Machin D (2000) Medical statistics—a common approach, 3rd edn. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, Wiley, pp147–148Google Scholar
  4. Hedman J, Kaprio J, Poussa T, Nieminen MM (1999) Prevalence of asthma, aspirin intolerance, nasal polyposis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a population-based study. Int J Epidemiol 28:717–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johansson Å, Löwhagen O, Millqvist E, Bende M (2002) Capsaicin inhalation test for identification of sensory hyperreactivity. Respir Med 96:731–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johansson L, Åkerlund A, Holmberg K, Melén I, Bende M (2003) Prevalence of nasal polyps in adults: the Skövde population-based study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kipen HM, Hallman W, Kelly-McNeil K, Fiedler N (1995) Measuring chemical sensitivity prevalence: a questionnaire for population studies. Am J Public Health 85:574–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kreutzer R, Neutra RR, Lashuay N (1999) Prevalence of people reporting sensitivities to chemicals in a population-based survey. Am J Epidemiol 150:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meggs WJ, Dunn KA, Bloch RM, Goodman PE, Davidoff AL (1996) Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health 51:275–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Millqvist E, Bende M, Löwhagen O (1998) Sensory hyperreactivity—a possible mechanism underlying cough and asthma-like symptoms. Allergy 53:1208–1212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nordin S, Brämersson A, Liden E, Bende M (1998) The scandinavian odour-identification test: development, reliability, validity and normative data. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 118:226–234Google Scholar
  12. Nordin S, Millqvist E, Löwhagen O, Bende M (2003) The chemical sensitivity scale: metric properties and comparison with the noise sensitivity scale. J Environ Psychol 23:357–365Google Scholar
  13. Nordin S, Millqvist E, Löwhagen O, Bende M (2004) A short chemical sensitivity scale for assessment of airway sensory hyperreactivity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:249–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordin S, Bende M, Millqvist E (2004) Normative data of the chemical sensitivity scale. J Environ Psychol (accepted for publication 2003)Google Scholar
  15. Ternesten-Hasseus E, Farbrot A, Löwhagen O, Millqvist E (2002) Sensitivity to methacholine and capsaicin in patients with unclear respiratory symptoms. Allergy 57:501–507PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Å. Johansson
    • 1
  • A. Brämerson
    • 2
  • E. Millqvist
    • 3
  • S. Nordin
    • 4
    • 5
  • M. Bende
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of LungCentral HospitalSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Departments of OtorhinolaryngologyCentral HospitalSkövdeSweden
  3. 3.Asthma and Allergy Research GroupSahlgrenska University HospitalGöteborgSweden
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  5. 5.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineÖrebro University HospitalÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations