Acute physiological responses in healthy men during whole-body vibration

  • Rammohan V. MaikalaEmail author
  • Sharla King
  • Yagesh N. Bhambhani
Original Article


Objective: The influence of backrest support and handgrip contractions on acute metabolic, respiratory, and cardiovascular responses were evaluated in 13 healthy men during exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV). Methods: Following assessment of aerobic fitness during arm cranking, subjects were exposed to frequencies 3, 4.5, and 6 Hz with 0.9 gr.m.s acceleration magnitude on a vibrating base in randomized order, on separate days. Each exposure included 6 min baseline without WBV, 8 min of WBV exposure either ‘with‘ or ‘without’ backrest, 4 min recovery, followed by 8 min of WBV with opposite backrest condition, and 4 min recovery. During the final minute of WBV, subjects performed right hand maximal rhythmic handgrip contractions for one minute. During baseline and before completion of WBV session ‘with’ and ‘without’ backrest, cardiac output was estimated indirectly by carbon dioxide rebreathing. Results: At 3 and 4.5, and 3 and 6 Hz, absolute and relative oxygen uptake demonstrated significantly greater responses during sitting ‘without’ backrest than ‘with’ backrest (P<0.01). At 3 and 4.5 Hz, heart rate and oxygen pulse responses were significantly greater during WBV combined with handgrip contractions than during WBV alone (P<0.01), demonstrating physical work during WBV will enhance greater metabolic responses. Stroke volume was the lowest at 4.5 Hz (P<0.01). Influence of aerobic fitness was evident only in absolute oxygen uptake, oxygen pulse, and ventilation volume (P<0.01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that subjects exposed to physical work during WBV will experience greater metabolic responses compared to WBV alone, and the physiological responses during WBV resemble to that of a light physical work. Despite low metabolic rates during WBV, the effect of aerobic fitness suggests the importance of physical activity in occupations exposed to WBV.


Cardiorespiratory responses Handgrip contractions Backrest support Spinal resonance frequency Aerobic fitness 



This study was part of the doctoral dissertation done by the first author at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. This project was partly supported by the Small Faculties Grant, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. The authors sincerely thank Al Fleming and Brian Henderson for their technical assistance, and Martha Roxburgh and Sharon Brintell of the Occupational Analysis Performance Unit for loaning the Vibrating Simulator. We are also grateful to Gurpreet Sidhu, Winnie Ting, Geetanjali Kashyap, and Mamdouh Farag for their help in initial experimental setup and data collection. All of the experiments conducted complied with the current laws of Canada.


  1. Andersson GBJ, Chaffin DB, Pope MH (1991) Occupational biomechanics of the lumbar spine. In: Pope MH, Andersson GBJ, Frymoyer JW, Chaffin DB (eds) Occupational low back pain. Assessment, treatment, and prevention. Mosby Year Book, Chicago, pp 20–43Google Scholar
  2. Bennett MD, Webb R, Withey WR (1977) Personality, performance and physiological cost during vibration. Proc Physiol Soc 270(1):75–76Google Scholar
  3. Bhambhani Y, Norris S, Bell G (1994) Prediction of stroke volume from oxygen pulse measurements in untrained and trained men. Can J Appl Physiol 19:49–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boff KR, Lincoln JE(1988) Vibration and display perception. In: Engineering data compendium: human perception and performance. AAMRL, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, pp 2064–2066Google Scholar
  5. Borg G (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:402–409Google Scholar
  6. Gaeuman JV, Hoover GN, Ashe WF (1962) Human vibration exposure. Aerospace Med 33:469–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grether WF, Harris CS, Mohr GC, Nixon CW, Shalburn M, Sommer HC, Thaler VH, Reghte J H (1971) Effects of combined heat, noise and vibration stress on human performance and physiological functions. Aerospace Med 42:1092–1097PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grether WF, Harris CS, Ohlbaum M, Sampson PA, Guinard JC (1972) Further study of combined heat, noise and vibration stress. Aerospace Med 43:641–645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin MJ (1990) Vibration and discomfort. In: Handbook of human vibration. Academic, New York, pp 43–123Google Scholar
  10. Guinard JC (1985) Vibration. Chapter 15. In: Patty’s industrial hygiene and toxicology. vol. 3b: biological responses. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hood WB, Murray RH, Urschel CW, Bower JA, Clark JG (1966) Cardio pulmonary effects of whole-body vibration in man. J Appl Physiol 21(6):1725–1731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoover GN, Ashe WF (1962) Respiratory response to whole-body vertical vibration. Aerospace Med 33:980–984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones NL (1986) Clinical exercise testing. Saunders, Toronto, pp 193–194Google Scholar
  14. McArdle WD, Katch I, Katch VL (1996) Exercise physiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 159Google Scholar
  15. Magnusson M, Pope MH, Lindell V, Svensson M, Andersson G (1987) The metabolic cost of occupational exposures. Ergonomics 30(1):55–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manninen O (1984) Hearing threshold and heart rate in men after repeated exposure to dynamic muscle work, sinusoidal Vs stochastic whole body vibration and stable broad band noise. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 54:19–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mannien O (1985) Cardiovascular changes and hearing threshold shifts in men under complex exposures to noise, whole-body vibrations, temperature and competition type psychic load. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 56:251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manninen O (1988) Changes in hearing, cardiovascular functions, haemodynamics, upright body sway, urinary catecholamines and their correlates after prolonged successive exposures to complex environmental conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 60:249–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Panjabi MM, Andersson GBJ, Jorneus L, Hult E, Mattsson L (1986) In vivo measurement of spinal column vibrations. J Bone Joint Surg 68A(5):695–703Google Scholar
  20. Pope MH, Magnusson M, Lindell V, Svensson M, Andersson GBJ (1990). The measurement of oxygen uptake under whole-body vibration. Iowa Orthop J 10:85–88Google Scholar
  21. Pope MH, Magnusson M, Wilder D (1998) Kappa delta award—low back pain and whole-body vibration. Clin Orthop Research 354:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt RT, Toews JV (1970) Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 51:321–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thornton R, Brown GA, Higenbottam C (1984) The energy expenditure of helicopter pilots. Avi Space Envi Med 55:746–750Google Scholar
  24. Webb RPG, Bennett MD, Farmillo B, Cole SH, Page SJ, Withey WR (1981) Personality and inter-subject differences in performance and physiological cost during whole-body vibration. Ergonomics 24:245–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilder D, Woodworth BB, Frymoyer JW, Pope MH (1982) Vibration and the human spine. Spine 7:243–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rammohan V. Maikala
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharla King
    • 2
  • Yagesh N. Bhambhani
    • 3
  1. 1.Liberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyHopkintonUSA
  2. 2.InterProfessional Initiative, Health Sciences CouncilUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations