Comparison of atomic absorption and fluorescence spectroscopic methods for the routine determination of urinary arsenic
- 147 Downloads
Objective: Interpretation of urinary arsenic measurements is sometimes difficult because of the absorption of seafood that contains trimethylated arsenic forms (arsenobetaine and arsenocholine). The objective of this study was to develop a rapid and robust technique for the measurement of the sum of inorganic arsenic metabolites. Methods: Measurement of arsenic was performed in urine after hydride generation in acid medium. Using atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) as the detection system, we developed a rapid (one determination in less than 2min) technique using 50 μl urine without pre-treatment. Standardisation was done externally with a mixed standard solution containing inorganic trivalent arsenic (As i III ), inorganic pentavalent arsenic (As i V ), monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) (15/15/12.5/57.5) Results: Samples distributed in the frame of an international comparison programme were used to assess accuracy of the AFS procedure, which gives a linear response up to 50 μg/l and proves more precise [coefficient of variation (CV)< 4% at 5 μg/l] and sensitive than the atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) technique using a quartz cell. An additional adaptation that allows the detection of non-directly reducible arsenic forms has also been validated for samples with high arsenic concentrations. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the superiority of AFS over atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) in arsenic determination and the interest of online mineralisation prior AFS detection for the determination of arsenic concentration in urine.
KeywordsArsenic Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy Atomic absorption spectroscopy Human urine
This work was supported by the Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural affairs from the Prime Minister of Belgium. The authors are grateful to B. Stockman for his assistance with the experiments.
- Broekaert J (2002) Analytical atomic spectrometry with flames and plasmas. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Buchet JP, Lauwerys RR, Roels H (1980) Comparison of several methods for the determination of arsenic compounds in water and in urine. Their application for the study of arsenic metabolism and for the monitoring of workers exposed to arsenic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 46:11–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buchet JP, Pauwels J, Lauwerys RR (1996b) Assessment of exposure to inorganic arsenic following ingestion of marine organisms by volunteers. Environ Res 66:44–51Google Scholar
- Col M, Col C, Soran A, Sayli BS, Ozturk S (1999) Arsenic-related Bowen’s disease, palmar keratosis, and skin cancer. Environ Health Perspect 107:687–689Google Scholar
- Enterline PE, Day R, Marsh GM (1995) Cancers related to exposure to arsenic at a copper smelter. Occup Environ Med 52:28–32Google Scholar
- Heinrich-Ramm R, Mindt-Prufert S, Szadkowski D (2001) Arsenic species excretion in a group of persons in northern Germany—contribution to the evaluation of reference values. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203:475–477Google Scholar
- Henry RJ (1965) Clinical chemistry: principles and technics. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Inczedy J, Lengyel T, Ure AM (1998) Compendium of analytical nomenclature (definitive rules 1997), IUPAC chemical nomenclature series, 3rd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Lauwerys R, Hoet P (2001) Biological monitoring of exposure to inorganic and organometallic substances. In: Lauwerys R, Hoet P (eds) Industrial chemical exposure: guidelines for biological monitoring. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 5–100Google Scholar
- Le XC, Cullen WR, Reimer KJ (1994) Human urinary arsenic excretion after one-time ingestion of seaweed, crab, and shrimp. Clin Chem 40:617–624Google Scholar
- Norin H, Vahter M (1981) A rapid method for the selective analysis of total urinary metabolites of inorganic arsenic. Scand J Work Environ Health 7:38–44Google Scholar