A short chemical sensitivity scale for assessment of airway sensory hyperreactivity

  • Steven Nordin
  • Eva Millqvist
  • Olle Löwhagen
  • Mats Bende
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

A short version of the 21-item Chemical Sensitivity Scale (CSS), called the Chemical Sensitivity Scale for Sensory Hyperreactivity (CSS-SHR), was developed and evaluated for the quantifying of self-reported affective reactions to and behavioral disruptions in daily activities by odorous/pungent substances among patients with sensory hyperreactivity (SHR) for clinical and epidemiological studies.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with clinically diagnosed SHR and 124 control participants responded to the CSS and to additional questions about chemical sensitivity for the evaluation of the CSS-SHR.

Results

Eleven of the 21 items of the CSS were selected, on statistical grounds, to constitute the CSS-SHR, which was found to generate approximately normal distributions, have good test–retest reliability (rxy=0.87), satisfying internal consistency (rα=0.76–0.84) and predictive and concurrent validity, and to be uni-dimensional. The metric properties of the CSS-SHR were, despite its few items, comparable with those of the CSS. A proposed diagnostic cut-off score for SHR demonstrated a high correct classification rate (92%) for the CSS-SHR.

Conclusions

The favorable metric properties of the CSS-SHR and its sensitivity/specificity suggests that it is useful for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological study of sensory hyperreactivity in combination with other diagnostic tools.

Keywords

Multiple chemical sensitivity Odor intolerance Sensory irritation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Vardal Foundation and the Swedish Research Council. We gratefully acknowledge Jonas Sandström and Ewa Ternesten for excellent assistance.

References

  1. Bell IR, Schwartz GE, Peterson JM, et al (1993) Self-reported illness from chemical odors in young adults without clinical syndromes or occupational exposures. Arch Environ Health 48:6–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Haynes SN, Richard DCS, Kubany ES (1995) Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess 7:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Johansson A, Löwhagen O, Millqvist E, et al (2002) Capsaicin inhalation test for identification of sensory hyperreactivity. Respir Med 96:731–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Meggs WJ, Dunn KA, Bloch RM, et al (1996) Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Arch Environ Health 51:275–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller CS (2003) Multiple chemical intolerance. In: Doty RL (ed) Handbook of olfaction and gestation. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 525–547Google Scholar
  6. Millqvist E (2000) Cough provocation with capsaicin is an objective way to test sensory hyperreactivity in patients with asthma-like symptoms. Allergy 55:546–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Millqvist E, Löwhagen O (1996) Placebo-controlled challenges with perfume in patients with asthma-like symptoms. Allergy 51:434–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Millqvist E, Bende M, Löwhagen O (1998) Sensory hyperreactivity: a possible mechanism underlying cough and asthma-like symptoms. Allergy 53:1208–1212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Millqvist E, Bengtsson U, Löwhagen O (1999) Provocations with perfume in the eyes induce airway symptoms in patients with sensory hyperreactivity. Allergy 54:495–499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nordin S, Brämerson A, Murphy C, et al (2003a) A Scandinavian adaptation of the Multi-Clinic Smell and Taste Questionnaire: evaluation of questions about olfaction. Acta Otolaryngol 123:536–542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nordin S, Millqvist E, Löwhagen O, et al (2003b) The Chemical Sensitivity Scale: psychometric properties and comparison with the Noise Sensitivity Scale. J Environ Psychol 23:357–365Google Scholar
  12. O’Connor BP (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:396–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Szarek MJ, Bell IR, Schwartz GE (1997) Validation of a brief screening measure of environmental chemical sensitivity: the Chemical Odor Intolerance Index. J Environ Psychol 17:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ternesten-Hasseus E, Farbrot A, Löwhagen O, et al (2002) Sensitivity to methacholine and capsaicin in patients with unclear respiratory symptoms. Allergy 57:501–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Nordin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eva Millqvist
    • 3
  • Olle Löwhagen
    • 3
  • Mats Bende
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineÖrebro University HospitalÖrebroSweden
  3. 3.Asthma and Allergy Research GroupSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyCentral HospitalSkövdeSweden

Personalised recommendations