Exposure to volatile organic compounds in residences adjacent to dyeing industrial complex

Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The present study was designed to evaluate residential exposure to selected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) relative to the proximity of the Daegu dyeing industrial complex (DDIC).

Methods

A series of surveys was conducted to measure the concentrations of five aromatic VOCs (toluene, benzene, m-xylene, p-xylene, and o-xylene) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) in the industrial outdoor air within the DDIC and in residential outdoor and indoor air based on the relative proximity of the DDIC.

Results

The geometric mean (GM) toluene value for the outdoor air samples from residential area R1 located near the DDIC (255 μg/m3) was about seven-times higher than that from residential area R2 located further away from the DDIC (36.9 μg/m3), whereas no significant difference was found in the outdoor air concentrations of the other target compounds between the two residential areas. Moreover, the elevated outdoor toluene levels outweighed the indoor sources with respect to the environmental exposure of residents near the DDIC. However, for the other target VOCs there was no significant difference between the residential exposure of residents living close to and a certain distance away from the DDIC.

Conclusions

The present study confirmed that residents in neighborhoods near the DDIC were exposed to elevated outdoor toluene levels compared with residents living further away from such a source. Furthermore, it appeared that the DDIC was a potential contributor to the nearby residential outdoor toluene levels.

Keywords

Dyeing industry Indoor and outdoor VOCs Proximity Residential exposure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The current study could not have been accomplished without the dedicated support of the residents of the 100 households surveyed and two company owners. The authors wish to thank four graduate students (J.H. Park, K.Y. Kim, J.W. Oh, and J.K. Kim) from the Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, for their sample collecting and/or analyses. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful corrections and valuable suggestions for our manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Korean Ministry of Environment.

References

  1. Baek SO, Kim YS, Perry R (1997) Indoor air quality in homes, offices and restaurants in Korean urban areas-indoor/outdoor relationships. Atmos Environ 31:529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castillo NP (1983) Standard operating procedure for preparing relative molar response and column performance evaluation Tenax cartridges using a flash evaporation system. RTI/ACS-SOP-630–002, Research Triangle Institute, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan CC, Spengler JD, Ozkaynak H, Lefkopoulou M (1991) Commuter exposure to VOCs in Boston, Massachusetts. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 41:1594–1600Google Scholar
  4. Cucco JA (1987) A method of determining the efficiency of air sampling traps to collect and release volatile compounds. Anal Lett 20:223–234Google Scholar
  5. Edwards RD, Jurvelin J, Koistinen K, Saarela K, Jantunen M (2001) VOC source identification from personal and residential indoor, outdoor and workplace microenvironment samples in EXPOLIS-Helsinki, Finland. Atmos Environ 35:4829–4841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer PH, Hoek G, van Reeuwijk H, Briggs DJ, Lebret E, van Wijnen JH, Kingham S, Elliott PE (2000) Traffic-related differences in outdoor and indoor concentrations of particles and volatile organic compounds in Amsterdam. Atmos Environ 34:3713–3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelencser A, Siszler K, Hlavay J (1997) Toluene–benzene concentration ratio as a tool for characterizing the distance from vehicular emission sources. Environ Sci Technol 31:2869–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanson DJ (1996) Toxics release inventory report shows chemical emissions continuing to fall. Chemical and Engineering News, July 15, pp 29–30Google Scholar
  9. Huang YL, Batterman S (2000) Residence location as a measure of environmental exposure: a review of air pollution epidemiology studies. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10:66–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1987) Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Supplement 7Google Scholar
  11. Ilgen E, Karfich N, Levsen K, Angerer J, Schneider P, Heinrich J, Wichmann H, Dunemann L, Begerow J (2001) Aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment: part I. Indoor versus outdoor sources, the influence of traffic. Atmos Environ 35:1235–1252Google Scholar
  12. Jo WK, Moon KC (1999) Housewives’ exposure to volatile organic compounds relative to proximity to roadside service stations. Atmos Environ 33:2921–2928Google Scholar
  13. Jo WK, Park KH (1999) Commuter exposure to volatile organic compounds under different driving conditions. Atmos Environ 33:409–417Google Scholar
  14. Lawryk NJ, Weisel CP (1996) Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in the passenger compartment of automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 30:810–816Google Scholar
  15. Lioy PJ, Weisel CP, Jo WK, Pellizzari E, Raymer JH (1994) Microenvironmental and personal measurements of methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) associated with automobile use activities. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 4:427–441Google Scholar
  16. Mehlman MA (1998) Dangerous and cancer-causing properties of products and chemicals in the oil-refining and petrochemical industries. Part-XXV: neurotoxic, allergic, and respiratory effects in humans from water and air contaminated by MTBE in gasoline. J Clean Technol Environ Toxicol Occup Med 7:65–84Google Scholar
  17. Monod A, Sive BC, Avino P, Chen T, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2001) Monoaromatic compounds in ambient air of various cities: a focus on correlations between the xylenes and ethylbenzene. Atmos Environ 35:135–149Google Scholar
  18. Moolenaar RL, Hefflin BJ, Ashley DL, Middaugh JP, Etzel RA (1994) Methyl tertiary butyl ether in human blood after exposure to oxygenated fuel in Fairbanks, Alaska. Arch Environ Health 49:402–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakai S, Nitta H, Maeda K (1995) Respiratory health associated with exposure to automobile exhaust II. Personal NO2 exposure levels according to distance from the roadside. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 5:125–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider P, Gebefügi I, Richter K, Wölke G, Schnelle J, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J, INGA study group (2001) Indoor and outdoor BTX levels in German cities. Sci Total Environ 267:41–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tancrede MR, Zeise WL, Crouch EAC (1987) The carcinogenic risk of some organic vapors indoors: a theoretical survey. Atmos Environ 21:2187–2205Google Scholar
  22. USEPA (1990) Cancer risk from outdoor exposure to air toxins. PA-450/1–90–004aGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallace LA, Pellizzari ED, Hartwell TD, Davis V, Michael LC, Whitmore RW (1989) The influence of personal activities on exposure to volatile organic compounds. Environ Res 50:37–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wicks ZW Jr, Jones FN, Pappas SP (1994) Organic coatings: science and technology, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 229–266Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguKorea
  2. 2.Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of MedicineYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations