Advertisement

Occupational skin-disease data in Europe

  • Thomas L. DiepgenEmail author
Review

Abstract

The different occupational health systems and legislations in the countries across Europe makes it difficult for one to sketch a detailed picture for the whole continent. Reporting bias and selection bias have a considerable impact on the perceived prevalence and incidence, while reliable data are hard to extract from official registries. Data from one region in Germany will serve as an example. Comparison with data from other sources yields an estimate of 0.7 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 per year as a gross average, while the problem in specific occupational groups is more pronounced. Reliable data on social and economic impact are very scarce.

Keywords

Occupational dermatitis Epidemiology Contact dermatitis Allergy Atopy Prognosis Prevention 

References

  1. Adishesh A, Meyer JD, Cherry NM (2002) Prognosis and work absence due to occupational contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 46:273–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avnstorp C (1989) Prevalence of cement eczema in Denmark before and since addition of ferrous sulfate to Danish cement. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 69:151–155Google Scholar
  3. Berndt U, Wigger-Alberti W, Gabard B, Elsner P (2000) Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 42:77–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrows D, Corbett JR (1977) Industrial dermatitis in Northern Ireland. Contact Dermatitis 3:145–50Google Scholar
  5. Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (1998) Risk of hand eczema in employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:7–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickel H, Kuss O, Blesius CR, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2001) Occupational skin diseases in Northern Bavaria between 1990 and 1999: a population based study. Br J Dermatol 145:453–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Kretz J, Diepgen TL (2002a) Importance of irritant dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 3:283–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2002b) Impact of preventive strategies on trend of occupational skin disease in hairdressers: population-based register study. Br Med J 324:1422–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2002c) Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:423–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickel H, Bruckner T, Berhard-Klimt C, Koch T, Scheidt R, Diepgen TL (2002d) Surveillance scheme for occupational skin disease in the Saarland, FRG: first report from BKH-S. Contact Dermatitis 46:197–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diepgen TL (2002) Hauterkrankungen in der Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin (editorial). Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 37:474–475Google Scholar
  12. Diepgen TL, Fartasch M (1993) General aspects of risk factors in hand eczema. In: Menné T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema. CRC Press, Boca Raton Ann Arbor London Tokyo, pp 141–156Google Scholar
  13. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ (1999) The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 72:496–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Diepgen TL, Drexler H (2000) Nickel und seine arbeitsmedizinische Bedeutung als Allergen. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 35:136–145Google Scholar
  15. Diepgen TL, Tepe A, Pilz B, Schmidt A, Hüner A, Huber A, Hornstein OP, Frosch PJ, Fartasch M (1993) Occupational skin diseases in hairdressers and nurses during apprenticeship—design of a prospective epidemiological study. Allergologie 10:396–403Google Scholar
  16. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A, Schmidt M, Fartasch M (1994) Demographic and legal characteristics of occupational skin diseases. Allergologie 17:84–89Google Scholar
  17. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A, Berg A, Plinske W (1995) Medizinische Hinweise für die berufliche Rehabilitation von hautkranken Beschäftigten. Dt Ärztebl 92:A31–A40Google Scholar
  18. Färm A (1986) Changing patterns in chromate allergy. Contact Dermatitis 15:298–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fregert S, Gruvberger G, Sandahl E (1979) Reduction of chromate in cement by iron sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 5:39–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frosch PJ, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, Dooms-Goossens A, Ducombs G, Lathi A, Menné T, Rycroft RJG, Shaw S, White IR, Wilkinson JD (1993) Allergic reactions to a hairdressers' series: results from 9 European centres. Contact Dermatitis 28:180–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Funke U, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (2001) Incidence of work related hand eczema in apprenticeship—first results of a prospective cohort study in the car industry. Contact Dermatitis 44:166–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Goh CL, Gan SL (1994) Efficacies of a barrier cream and an afterwork emollient cream against fluid dermatitis in metalworkers: a prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 31:176–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Halkier-Sorensen L (1996) Occupational skin diseases. Contact Dermatitis 35 [Suppl 1] 1–120Google Scholar
  24. Halkier-Sorensen L, Thestrup-Pedersen K (1993) The efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase) among cleaners and kitchen assistants during everyday exposure to water and detergents. Contact Dermatitis 29:1–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Maibach HI (1990) The prognosis of contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 23:300–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Irvine C, Pugh CE, Hansen EJ, Rycroft RJG (1994) Cement dermatitis in underground workers during construction of the Channel Tunnel. Occup Med 44:17–23Google Scholar
  27. Jowett S, Ryan T (1985) Skin disease and handicap: an analysis of the impact of skin conditions. Soc Sci Med 20:425–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (2000) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Lidén C, Röndell E, Skare L, Nalbanti A (1998) Nickel release from tools on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis 39:127–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lips R, Rast H, Elsner P (1996) Outcome of job change in patients with occupational chromate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 34:268–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McCormick R, Buchman TL, Maki DG (2000) Double-blind, randomized trial of scheduled use of a novel barrier cream and an oil-containing lotion for protecting the hands of health care workers. Am J Infect Control 28:302–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonagh AJG, Wright AL, Cork MJ, Gawkrodger DJ (1992) Nickel sensitivity: the influence of ear piercing and atopy. Br J Dermatol 126:16–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meding B, Swanbeck G (1987) Prevalence of hand eczema in an industrial city. Br J Dermatol 116:627–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meding B, Swanbeck G (1990) Consequences of having hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 23:6–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Meding B, Jarvholm B (2002) Hand eczema in Swedish adults—changes in prevalence between 1983 and 1996. J Invest Dermatol 118:719–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer JD, Chen Y, Holt DL, Beck MH, Cherry N (2000) Occupational contact dermatitis in the UK surveillance report from EPIDERM and OPRA. Occup Med 50:265–273Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, The Netherlands (1997) The cost of workplace circumstances in The Netherlands (Kerncijfers maatschappelijke kosten arbeidsomstandigheden). Vuga Uitgeverij, The Hague, The Netherlands, ISBN: 90.5250.683.3Google Scholar
  38. Nethercott JR, Holness DL (1994) Disease outcome in workers with occupational skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:569–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrenoud D, Gallerot D, van Melle G (2001) The efficacy of a protective cream in a real world apprentice hairdressers environment. Contact Dermatitis 45:134–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lehmacher W, Aberer W, Agathos M, Arnold R, Fuchs T, Laubstein B, Lischka G, et al. (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 37:200–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ (1996) Prognosis of occupational hand dermatitis in metalworkers. Contact Dermatitis 34:27–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smit HA, Coenraads PJ, Lavrijsen APM, Nater JP (1992) Evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 26:11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Smit HA, Burdorf A, Coenraads PJ (1993) The prevalence of hand dermatitis in different occupations. Int J Epidemiol 22:288–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smit HA, van Rijssen A, Vandenbroucke J, Coenraads PJ (1994) Individual susceptibility and the incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of apprentice hairdressers and nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health 20:113–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Svensson A, Meding B, Sundberg K, Stenberg B (2002) Self reported hand eczema: symptom based reports do not increase the validity of diagnosis. Br J Dermatol 147:281–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tacke J, Schmidt A, Fartasch M, Diepgen TL (1995) Occupational contact dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and cooks—a population-based study. Contact Dermatitis 33:112–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuohilampi questionnaire (2002) http://www.occuphealth.fiGoogle Scholar
  48. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ (1998) Hand eczema in a prospectively followed cohort of office workers. Contact Dermatitis 38:83–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ (1999) Hand dermatitis in a prospectively followed cohort of hairdressing apprentices: final results of the POSH study. Contact Dermatitis 41:280–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vermeulen R, Kromhout H, Bruynzeel DP, de Boer EM (2000) Ascertainment of hand dermatitis using a symptom-based questionnaire; applicability in an industrial population. Contact Dermatitis 42:202–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zachariae COC, Agner T, Menné T (1996) Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981. Contact Dermatitis 35:83–85PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Medicine, Center of Occupational and Environmental DermatologyUniversity Hospital of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations