Advertisement

Archive of Applied Mechanics

, Volume 89, Issue 4, pp 649–658 | Cite as

Singular solutions of truss size optimization for considering fundamental frequency constraints

  • Di-sheng Ou
  • Xiong-xin Zhou
  • Mao-hua Lin
  • C. T. TsaiEmail author
Original

Abstract

For engineering structures, the limits of internal stresses, nodal displacements and fundamental frequencies must be simultaneously considered. This had been paid attention in the theory of structural optimization. Actually, most examples of only considering static constraints or only considering dynamic constraints were presented for simultaneously considering static and dynamic constraints. A few examples of considering both static and dynamic constraints were presented, but the advantage could not be presented. It is the reason that the singularity of structural optimization for considering dynamic constraints has not been discussed. To discover the singularity, an optimization model to simultaneously consider static and dynamic constraints is used for the truss size optimization. And according to the extremum conditions of the optimization problem, Ratio-Extremum method is proposed to solve the optimization problems of considering both static and dynamic constraints and only considering dynamic constraints, in which a new searching direction of design variables is to be discussed. Particularly, the step-size factors can be determined by formulas to iteratively solve Lagrangian multipliers and design variables. Numerical examples of 15-bar planar and 72-bar spatial trusses are used to show the singular solutions. On the convergent points, the optimization weights of only considering dynamic constraints are about 66.17% and 71.14% more than the weights of considering both static and dynamic constraints, respectively. The convergent solutions of only considering dynamic constraints are not the best results. However, additional static constraints can be helpful to obtain better results for considering dynamic constraints.

Keywords

Truss size optimization Fundamental frequency constraints Singular solutions Ratio-Extremum method Step-size factors Searching direction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Guangxi University of Science and Technology (XKB15z06).

References

  1. 1.
    Miguel, L.F.F.: Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9458–9467 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gomes, H.M.: Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 957–968 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaveh, A., Zolghadr, A.: Topology optimization of trusses considering static and dynamic constraints using the CSS. Appl. Soft Comput. 13, 2727–2734 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, E., James, K.A., Martins, J.R.R.A.: Stress-constrained topology optimization with design-dependent loading. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 46, 647–661 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, X., Xie, Y.M.: Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures including design-dependent self-weight loads. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 47(8), 942–948 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fluery, C.: Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 14, 1761–1783 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, X.X., Ou, D.S.: Application of optimal step-size factor methods in truss sizing optimization. Chin. J. Appl. Mech. 31(4), 551–555 (2014) (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ou, D.S., Zhou, X.X.: Work-ratio-extremum method for topology optimization of trusses subjected to loads including self-weight. Eng. Mech. 28(7), 136–142 (2011) (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peter, D.: Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Di-sheng Ou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiong-xin Zhou
    • 1
  • Mao-hua Lin
    • 2
  • C. T. Tsai
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Engineering Training Center, Guangxi University of Science and TechnologyLiuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Ocean and Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations