Archive of Applied Mechanics

, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 685–707 | Cite as

Dynamic stability analysis of shear-flexible composite beams



Dynamic stability behavior of the shear-flexible composite beams subjected to the nonconservative force is intensively investigated based on the finite element model using the Hermitian beam elements. For this, a formal engineering approach of the mechanics of the laminated composite beam is presented based on kinematic assumptions consistent with the Timoshenko beam theory, and the shear stiffness of the thin-walled composite beam is explicitly derived from the energy equivalence. An extended Hamilton’s principle is employed to evaluate the mass-, elastic stiffness-, geometric stiffness-, damping-, and load correction stiffness matrices. Evaluation procedures for the critical values of divergence and flutter loads of the nonconservative system with and without damping effects are then briefly introduced. In order to verify the validity and the accuracy of this study, the divergence and flutter loads are presented and compared with the results from other references, and the influence of various parameters on the divergence and flutter behavior of the laminated composite beams is newly addressed: (1) variation of the divergence and flutter loads with or without the effects of shear deformation and rotary inertia with respect to the nonconservativeness parameter and the fiber angle change, (2) influence of the internal and external damping on flutter loads whether to consider the shear deformation or not.


Dynamic stability Shear deformation Composite beam Divergence Flutter 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bauld N.R., Tzeng L.: A Vlasov theory for fiber-reinforced beams with thin-walled open cross sections. Int. J. Solids Struct. 20, 277–297 (1984)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khdeir A.A., Reddy J.N.: Buckling of cross-ply laminated beams with arbitrary boundary conditions. Compos. Struct. 37, 1–3 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kollár László P.: Flexural-torsional buckling of open section composite columns with shear deformation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 7525–7541 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hodges D.H., Peters D.A.: Lateral–torsional buckling of cantilevered elastically coupled composite strip- and I-beams. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 1585–1603 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pandey M.D., Kabir M.Z., Sherbourne A.N.: Flexural-torsional stability of thin-walled composite I-section beams. Compos. Eng. 5, 321–342 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song O., Librescu L.: Anisotropic and structural coupling on vibration and instability of spinning thin-walled beams. J. Sound Vib. 204, 477–494 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song S.J., Waas M.: Effects of shear deformation on buckling and free vibration of laminated composite beams. Compos. Struct. 37, 33–43 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsunaga H.: Vibration and buckling of multilayered composite beams according to higher order deformation theories. J. Sound Vib. 246, 47–62 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loja M.A.R., Barbosa J.I., Mota Soares C.M.: Buckling behaviour of laminated beam structures using a higher-order discrete model. Compos. Struct. 38, 119–131 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin Z.M., Polyzois D., Shah A.: Stability of thin-walled pultruded structural members by finite element method. Thin-Walled Struct. 24, 1–18 (1996)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vo T.P., Lee J.: Flexural-torsional coupled vibration and buckling of thin-walled open section composite beams using shear-deformable beam theory. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 51, 631–641 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vo T.P., Lee J.: On sixfold coupled buckling of thin-walled composite beams. Compos. Struct. 90, 295–303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leipholz, H.: Stability of Elastic Systems. Sijthoff and Noordhoff International Publishers BV, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cveticanin L.J., Atanackovic T.M.: On Beck’s column with shear and compressibility. Struct. Eng. Mech. 6, 747–756 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gallina P.: About the stability of non-conservative undamped systems. J. Sound Vib. 262, 977–988 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gasparini A.M., Saetta A.V., Vitaliani R.V.: On the stability and instability regions of non-conservative continuous system under partially follower forces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 124, 63–78 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee H.P.: Dynamic stability of a rod with an intermediate spring support subjected to subtangential follower forces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 125, 141–150 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryu B.J., Katayama K., Sugiyama Y.: Dynamic stability of Timoshenko columns subjected to subtangential forces. Comput. Struct. 68, 499–512 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goyal V.K., Kapania R.K.: Dynamic stability of laminated beams subjected to nonconservative loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 46, 1359–1369 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiong, Y., Wang, T.K.: Stability of a beck-type laminated column. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM VI), vol. 5. Elsevier Applied Sciences, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith E.C., Chopra I.: Formulation and evaluation of an analytical model for composite box-beams. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 36, 23–35 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu X., Sun C.T.: Simplified theory for composite thin-walled beams. AIAA J. 30, 2945–2951 (1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gjelsvik A.: The Theory of Thin-walled Bars. Wiley, New York (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbero E.J., Lopez-Anido R., Davalos J.F.: On the mechanics of thin-walled laminated composite beams. J. Compos. Mater. 27, 806–829 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clough R.W., Penzien J.: Dynamics of Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bolotin V.V.: Non-conservative Problems of the Theory of Elastic Stability. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1963)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marzani A., Tornabene F., Viola E.: Nonconservative stability problems via generalized differential quadrature method. J. Sound Vib. 315, 176–196 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rao B.N., Rao G.V.: pplicability of the static or dynamic criterion for the stability of a cantilever column under a tip-concentrated subtangential follower force. J. Sound Vib. 120, 197–200 (1987)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kikuchi F.: A finite element method for non-self-adjoint problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 6, 39–54 (1973)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rao G.V., Rao B.N.: Galerkin finite element solution for the stability of cantilever columns subjected to tangential loads. AIAA J. 13, 690–691 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao B.N., Rao G.V.: Stability of tapered cantilever columns subjected to a tip-concentrated follower force with or without damping. Comput. Struct. 37, 333–342 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jung S.N., Lee J.Y.: Closed-form analysis of thin-walled composite I-beams considering non-classical effects. Compos. Struct. 60, 9–17 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chandra R., Chopra I.: Experimental and theoretical analysis of composite I-beams with elastic coupling. AIAA J. 29, 2197–2206 (1991)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee J.S., Kim N.I., Kim M.Y.: Sub-tangentially loaded and damped Beck’s columns on two-parameter elastic foundation. J. Sound Vib. 306, 766–789 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringSejong UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Urban Construction EngineeringUniversity of IncheonIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations