Advertisement

Comparison of postoperative refractive outcome in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy vs cataract surgery following vitrectomy

  • Paris G. TranosEmail author
  • Bruce Allan
  • Miltiadis Balidis
  • Athanasios Vakalis
  • Solon Asteriades
  • George Anogeianakis
  • Magda Triantafilla
  • Nikolaos Kozeis
  • Panagiotis Stavrakas
Retinal Disorders

Abstract

Background

To investigate the accuracy of preoperative biometry in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy and to compare it with eyes having cataract surgery at a later point in time following vitrectomy.

Methods

Patients with epiretinal membrane or macular hole who underwent combined phacovitrectomy (group 1) or phacoemulsification following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (group 2) were included in this retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. The primary outcome measures were the intraocular lens power prediction error (PE) and the percentage of eyes with PE > ± 0.5D in the two groups. Secondary outcome measures included the correlation between epidemiological, clinical, or surgical factors and dioptric shift. In addition, the influence of optical coherence tomography characteristics to the PE was investigated.

Results

Group 1 and 2 consisted of 55 and 54 eyes, respectively, for a total of 109 eyes included in the study. The mean absolute PE was 0.59 D (range + 1.4 to − 2.5D) in group 1 and 0.35 (range + 1.0 to − 1.45D) in group 2 (p = 0.01). PE greater than 0.5D was observed in 47% of eyes in group 1 as opposed to 16.6% of eyes in group 2 (p = 0.027). The PE was associated with shallower anterior chamber depth (ACD), increased central macular thickness (> 300 μ), and worse baseline best-corrected visual acuity. Photoreceptor ellipsoid zone or external limiting membrane disruption was not associated with significantly greater postoperative refractive deviations.

Conclusion

Combined phacovitrectomy may result in greater postoperative refractive prediction error compared to phacoemulsification alone following vitrectomy. Patients with worse vision, greater central macular thickness, and shallow anterior chambers require more caution since they are prone to inaccurate preoperative biometry.

Keywords

Phacovitrectomy Vitrectomy Refractive error Prediction error Epiretinal membrane Macular hole 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ophthalmica Eye Institute and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Koenig SB, Han DP, Mieler WF et al (1990) Combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 108:362–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koenig SB, Mieler WF, Hann DP, Abrams GW (1992) Combined phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, and posterior chamber intraocular lens insertion. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1101–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lahey JM, Francis RR, Fong DS et al (2002) Combining phacoemulsification with vitrectomy for treatment of MHs. Br J Ophthalmol 86:876–878PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottlieb CC, Martin JA (2002) Phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Can J Ophthalmol 37:277–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Theocharis IP, Alexandridou A, Gili NJ, Tomic Z (2005) Combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy for macular hole treatment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:172–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demetriades A-M, Gottsch JD, Thomsen R, Azab A, Stark WJ, Campochiaro PA, de Juan E Jr, Haller JA (2003) Combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 135:291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaudhry NA, Cohen KA, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG (2003) Combined pars plana vitrectomy and lens management in complex vitreoretinal disease. Semin Ophthalmol 18:132–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heiligenhaus A, Holtkamp A, Koch J, Schilling H, Bornfeld N, Losche CC, Steuhl K-P (2003) Combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy: clear corneal versus scleral incisions; prospective randomized multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1106–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ling R, Simcock P, McCoombes J, Shaw S (2003) Presbyopic phacovitrectomy Br J Ophthalmol 87:1333–1335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Treumer F, Bunse A, Rudolf M, Roider J (2006) Pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Comparison of clinical complications in a combined versus two-step surgical approach. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:808–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeoung JW, Chung H, Yu HG (2007) Factors influencing refractive outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy: results of a prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurley C, Barry P (1996) Combined endocapsular phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:462–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McElvanney AM (1997) Talbot EM (1997) posterior chamber lens implantation combined with pars plana vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:106–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scharwey K, Pavlovic S, Jacobi KW (1999) Combined clear corneal phacoemulsification, vitreoretinal surgery and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:693–698PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suzuki Y, Sakuraba T, Mizutani H, Matsuhashi H, Nakazawa M (2000) Postoperative refractive error after simultaneous vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 31:271–275PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smiddy WE, Mady M, Anagnoste S (2001) Acrylic intraocular lens placement in conjunction with pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 131:748–750PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Park DW, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J, Flindall RJ (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1815PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Olsen T (2006) Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:419–424PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kucumen RB, Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, Kulacoglu DN, Dinc UA, Alimgil ML (2008) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of anterior chamber depth and angle changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1694–1698PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Falkner-Radler CI, Benesch T, Binder S (2008) Accuracy of preoperative biometry in vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for patients with epiretinal membranes and macular holes; results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1754–1760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schweitzer KD, Garcia R (2008) Myopic shift after combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy with gas tamponade. Can J Ophthalmol 43:581–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tseng PC, Woung LC, Tseng GL, Tsai CY, Chou HK, Chen CC, Liou SW (2012) Refractive change after pars plana vitrectomy. Taiwan J Ophthalmo l2:18–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Do DV, Gichuhi S, Vedula SS, Hawkins BS (2013) Surgery for post-vitrectomy cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD006366PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee JY, Kim KH, Shin KH, Han DH, Lee DY, Nam DH (2012) Comparison of intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification between sequential and combined procedures of pars plana vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 32(10):2026–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng L, Azen SP, El-bradey MH et al (2001) Duration of vitrectomy and postoperative cataract in the vitrectomy for macular hole study. Am J Ophthalmol 132(6):881–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faulborn J, Conway BP, Machemer R (1978) Surgical complications of pars plana vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 85(2):116–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fajgenbaum MAP, Robins J, Williamson TH (2017) Refractive outcomes using the Lenstar optical low coherence Reflectometry biometer in Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal membranes and macular holes. Open Journal of Ophthalmology 7:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shams N, Mobaraki H, Kamali M, Jafarzadehpour E (2015) Comparison of quality of life between myopic patients with spectacles and contact lenses, and patients who have undergone refractive surgery. J CurrOphthalmol 27(1-2):32–36Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pan CW, Ramamurtly D, Saw SM (2012) Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32:3–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vu HT, Keeffe JE, McCarty CA, Taylor HR (2005) Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 89:360–363PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tranos PG, Ghazi-Nouri SM, Rubin GS, Adams ZC, Charteris DG (2004) Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 138(6):995–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ghazi-Nouri SMS, Tranos PG, Rubin GS, Adams ZC, Charteris DG (2006) Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 90(5):559–562PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wagenfeld L, Hermsdorf K, Stemplewitz B, Druchkiv V, Frings A (2017) Refractive predictability in eyes with intraocular gas tamponade – results of a prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol 11:993–998PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamoudi H, La Cour M (2013) Refractive changes after vitrectomy and phacovitrectomy for macular hole and epiretinal membrane. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(6):942–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shioya M, Ogino N, Shinjo U (1997) Change in postoperative refractive error when vitrectomy is added to intraocular lens implantation.J. Cataract Refract Surg 23(8):1217–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kovács I, Ferencz M, Nemes J, Somfai G, Salacz G, Récsán Z (2007) Intraocular lens power calculation for combined cataract surgery, vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membranes for macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:88–91PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Patel D, Rahman R, Kumarasamy M (2007) Accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for macular holes. J CataractRefractSurg 33:1760–1762Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frings A, Dulz S, Skevas C, Stemplewitz B, Linke SJ, Richard G, Wagenfeld L (2015) Postoperative refractive error after phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with and without macular oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo l253(7):1097–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Al M, Legris A (2017) Prognostic factors of epiretinal membranes. A systematic review. J Fr Ophtalmol 40(1):61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chong EW, Mehta JS (2016) High myopia and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmo l27(1):45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang Q-H, Chen B, Peng G-H, Li Z-H, Huang Y-F (2014) Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol 7(3):441–445PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sheard R (2014) Optimizing biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 28(2):118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Iwase T, Sugiyama K (2006) Investigation of the stability of one-piece acrylic intraocular lenses in cataract surgery and in combined vitrectomy surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 90:1519–1523PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
    Maeng HS, Ryu EH, Chung TY, Chung ES (2010) Effects of anterior chamber depth and axial length on refractive error after intraocular Lens implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 51(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hirnschall N, Amir-Asgari S, Maedel S, Findl O (2013) Predicting the postoperative intraocular lens position using continuous intraoperative optical coherence tomography measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:5196–5203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paris G. Tranos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bruce Allan
    • 2
  • Miltiadis Balidis
    • 1
  • Athanasios Vakalis
    • 1
  • Solon Asteriades
    • 1
  • George Anogeianakis
    • 3
  • Magda Triantafilla
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nikolaos Kozeis
    • 1
  • Panagiotis Stavrakas
    • 5
  1. 1.Ophthalmica Eye InstituteThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Moorfields Eye HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Leicester Royal InfirmaryLeicesterUK
  4. 4.Association for Biomedical TechnologyThessalonikiGreece
  5. 5.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of Patras Medical SchoolPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations