Impact of integrated multiple image averaging on OCT angiography image quality and quantitative parameters
Multiple image averaging (MIA) is a new approach to improve OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging. The aim of this work was to analyze the impact of MIA on image quality and quantitative OCTA parameters.
Twenty eyes from 20 healthy volunteers (55.65 ± 14.8 years) were prospectively enrolled. Imaging was performed using two commercially available OCTA devices (Canon OCT HS-100, Optovue AngioVue) using a uniform imaging protocol. Each participant had two single scans of the macula (3 × 3mm, Canon and Optovue) as well as five continuous single scan imaging procedures (3 × 3mm each) using the Canon device. Three out of five of these images with highest quality were manually chosen and then automatically processed by the Canon device using MIA.
The superficial retinal plexus of the single scans and of MIA images was analyzed with regard to the device’ own image quality scores (IQS), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), the size of the foveolar avascular zone (FAZ), and vessel density (VD). Image acquisition times were recorded. Parameters were compared between the devices and the different imaging protocols.
Average acquisition time was significantly higher for the MIA compared with the single measurements (29.09 ± 10.19 seconds (s) (MIA) vs. 5.56 ± 2.17 s (Canon single scan) vs. 20.28 ± 6.81 s (Optovue) (p < 0.001)). IQS showed no significant differences between the devices and between the recording protocols. PSNR was 12.38 ± 0.20 (Canon single scan), 13.01 ± 0.36 (Canon MIA), and 14.34 ± 0.60 (Optovue) (p < 0.001 between the groups). Mean FAZ area in Canon single scans was 0.29 ± 0.06 mm2, 0.27 ± 0.07 mm2 using MIA, and 0.27 ± 0.08 mm2 using the Optovue device. There was no significant difference between mean FAZ measurements before and after averaging (Canon single scan vs. MIA, p = 0.168). VD of the parafoveal area using MIA was significantly lower compared with both single scans (p < 0.001).
MIA can improve PSNR, but it also reduces imaging speed and significantly affects VD measurements. Therefore, when comparing OCTA data, the use of uniform imaging protocols is required.
KeywordsOptical coherence tomography angiography Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography Image quality Retinal imaging
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
J. L. Lauermann, Bayer, Eyetec, Novartis; Y. Xu, grant (No. 201706270193) from China Scholarship Council; P. Heiduschka, Bayer, Novartis; M. Treder, Bayer, Novartis; F. Alten, Bayer; N. Eter, Heidelberg Engineering, Novartis, Bayer, Sanofi Aventis, Allergan, Bausch and Lomb; M. Alnawaiseh, Novartis.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Lauermann JL, Treder M, Heiduschka P, Clemens CR, Eter N, Alten F (2017) Impact of eye-tracking technology on OCT-angiography imaging quality in age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255(8):1535–1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3684-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Lei J, Baghdasaryan E, Al-Sheikh M, Sadda SR (2017) Choriocapillaris imaging using multiple en face optical coherence tomography angiography image averaging. JAMA Ophthalmol 135(11):1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3904 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Rommel F, Siegfried F, Kurz M, Brinkmann MP, Rothe M, Rudolf M, Grisanti S, Ranjbar M (2018) Impact of correct anatomical slab segmentation on foveal avascular zone measurements by optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy adults. J Curr Ophthalmol 30(2):156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2018.02.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Welstead ST (1999) Fractal and wavelet image compression techniques. SPIE Publication pp 155–156. ISBN 978-0-8194-3503-3Google Scholar
- 22.Schmitz B, Nelis P, Rolfes F, Alnawaiseh M, Klose A, Krüger M, Eter N, Brand SM, Alten F (2018) Effects of high-intensity interval training on optic nerve head and macular perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy adults. Atherosclerosis 274:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lahme L, Esser EL, Mihailovic N, Schubert F, Lauermann J, Johnen A, Eter N, Duning T, Alnawaiseh M (2018) Evaluation of ocular perfusion in Alzheimer’s disease using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Alzheimers Dis 66(4):1745–1752. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180738 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Corvi F, Pellegrini M, Erba S, Cozzi M, Staurenghi G, Giani A (2018) Reproducibility of vessel density, fractal dimension, and foveal avascular zone using 7 different optical coherence tomography angiography devices. Am J Ophthalmol 186:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Arya M, Rebhun CB, Alibhai AY, Chen X, Moreira-Neto C, Baumal CR, Reichel E, Witkin AJ, Duker JS, Sadda SR, Waheed NK (2018) Parafoveal retinal vessel density assessment by optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 49(10):S5–S17. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20180814-02 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Jung JJ, Chen MH, Shi Y, Nassisi M, Marion K, Sadda SR, Hoang QV (2019) Correlation of en face optical coherence tomography angiography averaging versus single-image quantitative measurements with retinal vein occlusion visual outcomes. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002453