Advertisement

Multicenter survey of sutureless 27-gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a consecutive series of 410 cases

  • Yoichiro Shinkai
  • Yusuke Oshima
  • Kazuhito YonedaEmail author
  • Jiro Kogo
  • Hisanori Imai
  • Akira Watanabe
  • Yoshitsugu Matsui
  • Kotaro Suzuki
  • Chie Sotozono
  • The 27G Vitrectomy Study Group
Retinal Disorders
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of the 27-gauge (G) vitrectomy system for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods

This retrospective consecutive series multicenter study involved a total of 410 eyes of 406 patients who underwent 3-port transconjunctival 27G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RRD between November 2014 and December 2016 and who were followed for a minimum of 3 months postoperative. The main outcome measure was primary reattachment, with the secondary outcome measures being final reattachment, improvement of visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and surgery time.

Results

Of the 410 treated eyes, primary reattachment was achieved in 392 (95.6%) and final reattachment was achieved in 410 (100%). In 226 eyes (55.1%) with macula-on RRD, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA improved from 0.16 ± 0.51 pre-surgery to 0.02 ± 0.14 post-surgery (P = 0.11). In 184 eyes (44.9%) with macula-off RRD, logMAR VA improved from 1.06 ± 0.77 pre-surgery to 0.26 ± 0.35 post-surgery (P < 0.001). Following surgery, the mean IOP was highest at 1 day (15.7 ± 7.0 mmHg) postoperative. In all eyes, surgery was concluded without the use of sutures or the need of conversion to a larger-gauge instrument. Although hypotony was observed in 14 (3.4%) of the 410 treated eyes at 1 day postoperative, it spontaneously resolved within 1 week without additional surgical intervention. No postoperative complications such as infectious endophthalmitis were observed throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Our findings show that 27G PPV is both safe and effective for the treatment of primary RRD.

Keywords

27-Gauge (G) Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) Sutureless 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank John Bush for reviewing the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this retrospective multicenter survey study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the requirements for a parallel Institutional Review Board (IRB; Registration No. UMIN000031103) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Assi AC, Scott RA, Charteris DG (2000) Reversed self-sealing pars plana sclerotomies. Retina 20:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Nohutcu AF (2005) Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival (25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:939–941.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okamoto F, Okamoto C, Sakata N, Hiratsuka K, Yamane N, Hiraoka T, Kaji Y, Oshika T (2007) Changes in corneal topography after 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus after 20-gauge standard vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 114:2138–2141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kellner L, Wimpissinger B, Stolba U, Brannath W, Binder S (2007) 25-Gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 91:945–948.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.106799 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Lim JI, Chong LP, Chang TS, Javaheri M, Fujii GY, Barnes AC, Alexandrou TJ (2005) Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 112:817–824.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen JC (1996) Sutureless pars plana vitrectomy through self-sealing sclerotomies. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1273–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Awh C, Ng E, Barnes A, Wu SL, Sommerville DN (2002) A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1807–1812 discussion 1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, Chang TS, Pieramici DJ, Barnes A, Kent D (2002) Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1814–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eckardt C (2005) Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina 25:208–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T, Ohji M, Tano Y (2010) A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 117:93–102.e2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitsui K, Kogo J, Takeda H, Shiono A, Sasaki H, Munemasa Y, Kitaoka Y, Takagi H (2016) Comparative study of 27-gauge vs 25-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Eye (Lond) 30:538–544.  https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizzo S, Barca F, Caporossi T, Mariotti C (2015) Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal diseases. Retina 35:1273–1278.  https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000545 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoneda K, Morikawa K, Oshima Y, Kinoshita S, Sotozono C (2017) Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge vitrectomy for a consecutive series of 163 eyes with various vitreous diseases. Retina 37:2130–2137.  https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001442 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan MA, Kuley A, Riemann CD, Berrocal MH, Lakhanpal RR, Hsu J, Sivalingam A, Ho AC, Regillo CD (2018) Long-term visual outcomes and safety profile of 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 125:423–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fine HF, Iranmanesh R, Iturralde D, Spaide RF (2007) Outcomes of 77 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 114:1197–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oshima Y, Shima C, Wakabayashi T, Kusaka S, Shiraga F, Ohji M, Tano Y (2009) Microincision vitrectomy surgery and intravitreal bevacizumab as a surgical adjunct to treat diabetic traction retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 116:927–938.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kloti R (1981) Retinal holes - cause and therapeutical key of retinal detachments. Iatrogenic holes (author’s transl). Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 179:276–279.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1057310 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Escoffery RF, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Boniuk I (1985) Vitrectomy without scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 99:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kobashi H, Takano M, Yanagita T, Shiratani T, Wang G, Hoshi K, Shimizu K (2014) Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 542 eyes. Curr Eye Res 39:204–211.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2013.838270 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Susskind D, Neuhann I, Hilgers RD, Hagemann U, Szurman P, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Aisenbrey S (2016) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in pseudophakic eyes: 20-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 94:824–828.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13133 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohamed YH, Ono K, Kinoshita H, Uematsu M, Tsuiki E, Fujikawa A, Kitaoka T (2016) Success rates of vitrectomy in treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol 2016:2193518.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2193518 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rizzo S, Polizzi S, Barca F, Caporossi T, Virgili G (2017) Comparative study of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol 2017:6384985.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6384985 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otsuka K, Imai H, Fujii A, Miki A, Tagami M, Azumi A, Nakamura M (2018) Comparison of 25- and 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in repairing primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol 2018:7643174.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7643174 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourla DH, Bor E, Axer-Siegel R, Mimouni K, Weinberger D (2010) Outcomes and complications of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair with selective sutureless 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 149:630–634.e631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dugel PU, Zhou J, Abulon DJ, Buboltz DC (2012) Tissue attraction associated with 20-gauge, 23-gauge, and enhanced 25-gauge dual-pneumatic vitrectomy probes. Retina 32:1761–1766.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182456f4d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo IY, Loh BK, Wong EY, Wong DW, Ong SG, Ang CL, Lee SY (2014) Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large Asian tertiary eye center. Retina 34:684–692.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182a48900 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mikhail MA, Mangioris G, Casalino G, McGimpsey S, Sharkey J, Best R, Chan WC (2017) Outcome of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a tertiary referral centre in Northern Ireland - a regional study. Ulster Med J 86:15–19PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt JC, Rodrigues EB, Hoerle S, Meyer CH, Kroll P (2003) Primary vitrectomy in complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--a survey of 205 eyes. Ophthalmologica 217:387–392.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000073067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pavlidis M (2016) Two-dimensional cutting (TDC) vitrectome: in vitro flow assessment and prospective clinical study evaluating core vitrectomy efficiency versus standard vitrectome. J Ophthalmol 2016:3849316.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3849316 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibarra MS, Hermel M, Prenner JL, Hassan TS (2005) Longer-term outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 139:831–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Byeon SH, Lew YJ, Kim M, Kwon OW (2008) Wound leakage and hypotony after 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy: factors affecting postoperative intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Woo SJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, Kim JH, Yu YS, Chung H (2009) Risk factors associated with sclerotomy leakage and postoperative hypotony after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina 29:456–463.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318195cb28 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Teixeira A, Allemann N, Yamada AC, Uno F, Maia A, Bonomo PP (2009) Ultrasound biomicroscopy in recently postoperative 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy sutureless self-sealing sclerotomy. Retina 29:1305–1309.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181b09487 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yamane S, Kadonosono K, Inoue M, Kobayashi S, Watanabe Y, Arakawa A (2011) Effect of intravitreal gas tamponade for sutureless vitrectomy wounds: three-dimensional corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Retina 31:702–706.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181f0d2e6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yomoda R, Sasaki H, Kogo J, Shiono A, Jujo T, Sekine R, Tokuda N, Kitaoka Y, Takagi H (2018) Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Clin Ophthalmol 12:2409–2414.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456 eCollection 2018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y (2006) Surgical outcomes of 25-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for vitreoretinal diseases. Ann Acad Med Singap 35:175–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller DM, Riemann CD, Foster RE, Petersen MR (2008) Primary repair of retinal detachment with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 28:931–936.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816b313a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Dev S, Shaikh S, Mittra RA, Arevalo JF, Kychenthal A, Acar N (2008) Endophthalmitis after 25-gauge and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: incidence and outcomes. Retina 28:138–142.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31815e9313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Czajka MP, Byhr E, Olivestedt G, Olofsson EM (2016) Endophthalmitis after small-gauge vitrectomy: a retrospective case series from Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol 94:829–835.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oshima Y, Kadonosono K, Yamaji H, Inoue M, Yoshida M, Kimura H, Ohji M, Shiraga F, Hamasaki T (2010) Multicenter survey with a systematic overview of acute-onset endophthalmitis after transconjunctival microincision vitrectomy surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 150:716–725.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bamonte G, Mura M, Stevie Tan H (2011) Hypotony after 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 151:156–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wu L, Berrocal MH, Arevalo JF, Carpentier C, Rodriguez FJ, Alezzandrini A, Farah ME, Roca JA, Maia M, Saravia M, Morales-Canton V, Graue-Wiechers F, Cardillo JA (2011) Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy: results of the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study Group. Retina 31:673–678.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318203c183 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoichiro Shinkai
    • 1
  • Yusuke Oshima
    • 2
  • Kazuhito Yoneda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiro Kogo
    • 3
  • Hisanori Imai
    • 4
  • Akira Watanabe
    • 5
  • Yoshitsugu Matsui
    • 6
  • Kotaro Suzuki
    • 7
  • Chie Sotozono
    • 1
  • The 27G Vitrectomy Study Group
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Oshima Eye ClinicTakatsukiJapan
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologySt. Marianna University School of MedicineKawasakiJapan
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologyKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan
  5. 5.Department of OphthalmologyJikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Department of OphthalmologyMie University Graduate School of MedicineTsuJapan
  7. 7.Department of OphthalmologyKeiyu HospitalYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations