Optimizing esthetic outcomes in graded full-thickness anterior blepharotomy for Graves’ ophthalmopathy
- 15 Downloads
Current outcome measures do not adequately address the esthetic aspect of the surgical outcome of anterior blepharotomy for Graves’ ophthalmopathy. This study aims to highlight the role of tarsal platform show (TPS) in optimizing the esthetic outcome of graded full-thickness anterior blepharotomy for dysthyroid upper eyelid retraction in an ethnic Chinese population.
The records of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy who underwent anterior blepharotomy for upper eyelid retraction over a period of 30 months were retrospectively reviewed.
Fifty-five patients (77 eyelids) with upper eyelid retraction underwent anterior blepharotomy. A statistically significant decrease in marginal reflex distance (MRD1) and lagophthalmos and significant increase in TPS following anterior blepharotomy was observed. A significantly higher proportion of patients who underwent unilateral anterior blepharotomy had TPS asymmetry post-operatively as compared to the bilateral group (p < 0.001). Using logistic regression, the study found that for every 1-mm change in MRD1, there was approximately a 1.045-mm change in TPS. The mean percentage increase in TPS observed in our study was 303.1 ± 191% due to the low pre-operative TPS seen in Asian patients.
To achieve the most ideal surgical outcome in graded full-thickness anterior blepharotomy, the surgeon will need to consider not only eyelid height but also the subsequent TPS change. The surgeon needs to be mindful of the relationship between MRD1 change and TPS change to optimize esthetic outcome as well as symmetry. Special considerations need to be taken in unilateral cases as well as patients with low pre-operative TPS.
KeywordsEsthetic outcome Anterior blepharotomy Upper eyelid retraction Tarsal platform show Graves’ ophthalmopathy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any materials or methods mentioned in this article.
- 5.Ohnishi T, Noguchi S, Murakami N, Nakahara H, Hoshi H, Jinnouchi S, Futami S, Nagamachi S, Watanabe K (1993) Levator palpebrae superioris muscle: MR evaluation of enlargement as a cause of upper eyelid retraction in Graves disease. Radiology 188(1):115–118. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.1.8511284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Liu D (1993) Surgical correction of upper eyelid retraction. Ophthalmic Surg 24(5):323–327Google Scholar
- 12.Harvey JT, Corin S, Nixon D, Veloudios A (1991) Modified levator aponeurosis recession for upper eyelid retraction in Graves’ disease. Ophthalmic Surg 22(6):313–317Google Scholar
- 18.Goldberg RA, Lew H (2011) Cosmetic outcome of posterior approach ptosis surgery (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 109:157–167Google Scholar
- 19.Lew H, Goldberg RA (2016) Maximizing symmetry in upper blepharoplasty: the role of microptosis surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):296e–304e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475751.48462.b7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Evans JA, Clark TJE, Zimmerman MB, Allen RC, Nerad JA, Carter KD, Shriver EM (2018) Rethinking our definition of postoperative success: a comparative analysis of three upper eyelid retraction repair techniques using novel metrics to capture functional and aesthetic outcomes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 34(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000868 Google Scholar