Advertisement

The role of the vitreous body in effective IOL positioning

  • Joris Vander Mijnsbrugge
  • Jean-Francois Fils
  • Joyce Jansen
  • Minh-Tri Hua
  • Peter Stalmans
Cataract

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the effective lens position (ELP) after phaco surgery alone and after combined phacovitrectomy surgery.

Methods

Twenty patients who were scheduled for elective surgery in both eyes were included. In one eye, phacovitrectomy surgery was performed (without any tamponade), and in the fellow eye, only phaco surgery was performed using the same IOL type. Pre- and postoperative biometric measurements were performed using laser interference biometry. The postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured to determine the ELP. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the postoperative ACD between both eyes.

Results

The postoperative ACD following phacovitrectomy showed a statistically significant increase compared with that following phaco surgery alone, indicating a more posterior position of the IOL.

Conclusions

An adjusted ELP parameter to optimize IOL calculation may be useful in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy sugergy.

Keywords

Effective lens position Phacovitrectomy Postoperative anterior chamber depth  IOL power calculation formulas 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was registered at the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Leuven prior to patient inclusion. Registration number ELP20160105. January 2016.

Conflict of interest

Peter Stalmans is a consultant for Bausch + Lomb, DORC, Nano-Retina, Ophtec, Vitreq and Zeiss, received speaker fees from AMO and received a research grant from Thrombogenics.

References

  1. 1.
    Olsen T, Hoffmann P (2014) C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:764–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falkner-Radler C, Benesch T, Binder S (2008) Accuracy of preoperative biometry in vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for patients with epiretinal membranes and macular holes. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1754–1760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamoudi H, La Cour M (2013) Refractive changes after vitrectomy and phacovitrectomy for macular hole and epiretinal membrane. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:942–947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olsen T (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scan 85:472–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrne S, James Ng, Hildreth A, Danjoux J-P, Steel D.(2008) Refractive change following pseudophakic vitrectomy. BMC Ophthalmol 8:19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamoudi H, Kofod M, La Cour M (2013) Refractive change after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 91:434–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeoung JW, Chung H, Yu HG (2007) Factors influencing refractive outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:108–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gülkilik G, Erdur S, Özbek M, Özsütcü M, Adabasi M, Demirci G, Kocabora M, Eliacik M (2016) Changes in anterior chamber depth after combined phacovitrectomy. Turk J Ophthalmol 46:161–164PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li Y, Yang CX, Qing GP, Wei WB (2013) Changes in anterior chamber depth following vitrectomy. Chin Med J 126(19):3701–3704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seo S, Seong MC, Lim HW, Kang MH, Cho HY (2013) The changes of anterior chamber depth, axial length, refractive errors after combined vitrectomy. J Korean Opthalmol Soc 54(7):1021–1037Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Armstrong RA (2013) Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 33(1):7–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Datta S, Satten G (2005) Rank-sum tests for clustere data. J Am Stat Assoc 100:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang Y, He X, Ting Lee M-L, Rosner B, Yan J.(2017) Wilcoxon rank-based tests for clustered data with R package clusrank. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03409.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Ars StatisticaNivellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations