Mechanism of accommodation assessed by change in precisely registered ocular images associated with concurrent change in auto-refraction
Our purpose was to determine the changes in anterior chamber depth (ACD) and central lens thickness (CLT) during pharmacologically induced accommodation.
Following pupillary dilation with phenylephrine 10%, baseline auto-refractions and swept-source optical coherence tomographic biometric images (Zeiss IOLMaster 700) were obtained from the right eyes of 25 subjects aged 19 to 24 years. Pilocarpine 4% and phenylephrine 10% were then instilled into these right eyes. One hour later, auto-refractions and biometric imaging were repeated. Only data from eight of 25 subjects met the following stringent criteria to be included in the study analysis: pre and post-pilocarpine biometric foveal images were registerable, the images of the corneal centers were shifted by ≤100 μm, pupils >5 mm and the pharmacologically induced refractive change was ≥ −7 diopters.
The mean auto-refractive accommodative change for the eight included subjects was −12.45 diopters (± 3.45 diopters). The mean change in CLT was 81 μm (± 54 μm) and the mean change in ACD was −145 μm (± 86 μm). Superimposition of the registered pre and post-pilocarpine biometric images of the sagittal sections of the whole eye from each subject demonstrated that the position of the whole lens did not shift either anteriorly, posteriorly or vertically during pharmacologically induced accommodation.
A small increase in lens thickness was associated with a large change in accommodative amplitude and no significant change in lens position as predicted by the Schachar theory.
KeywordsAccommodation Central lens thickness Image registration Mechanism Small displacement
No funding was received for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 14.Schachar R A, Tello C, Cudmore DP, Liebmann JM, Black TD, Ritch R (1996) In vivo increase of the human lens equatorial diameter during accommodation. Am J Physiol 271(3 pt. 2):R670-676Google Scholar
- 15.IOL Master 700 (2015) User Manual. Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG, Jena, Germany, pp 40–50Google Scholar
- 16.Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J, Büehren T (2016) Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:76–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Garza-Leon M, Fuentes-de la Fuente HA, García-Treviño AV (2016) Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0380-7
- 20.Schachar RA (2012) The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia. Kugler Publications, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 21.von Helmholtz H (1855) Uber die akkommodation des auges. Archiv für Ophthalmol 1:1–74Google Scholar
- 22.Esteve-Taboada JJ, Del Águila-Carrasco AJ, Bernal-Molina P, Ferrer-Blasco T, López-Gil N, Montés-Micó R (2016) Effect of phenylephrine on the accommodative system. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7968918
- 29.Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, OD, Glasser A (2003) Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1878-1888Google Scholar
- 30.Kirkwood BR, Sterne AC (2003) Medical statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, pp 413–428Google Scholar
- 44.Duke-Elder SS (1969) Diseases of the lens and vitreous; glaucoma and hypotony. In: Duke-elder SS (ed) system of ophthalmology, vol XI. London, pp 125-142Google Scholar
- 45.Goss DA, Van Veen HG, Rainey BB, Feng B (2002) Ocular components measured by keratometry, phakometry, and ultrasonography in emmetropic and myopic optometry students. Optom Vis Sci 80:226–236Google Scholar
- 47.Vanderploeg JM (1985) Near visual acuity measurements of space shuttle crewmembers. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:492Google Scholar
- 52.Tscherning M (1904) Physiological optics, 2nd edn. The Keyston, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 160–189Google Scholar
- 53.Fincham EF (1937) Mechanism of accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol 8(supplement):2–80Google Scholar
- 56.Sokolowska A, Thorn F (2003) Accommodation induced changes in crystalline lens position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(E-Abstract #):4072Google Scholar
- 57.Schachar RA, Davila C, Pierscionek BK, Chen W, Ward WW (2007) The effect of human in vivo accommodation on crystalline lens stability 91:790-793Google Scholar
- 66.Ke B, Mao X, Jiang H, He J, Liu C, Li M, Yuan Y, Wang J (2017) The relationship between high-order aberration and anterior ocular biometry during accommodation in young healthy adults. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 58:5628–5635Google Scholar