The interaction of pupil response with the vergence system
- 307 Downloads
A gaze shift from a target at distance to a target at near leads to pupillary constriction. The regulation of this pupillary near response is ill known. We investigated the impact of accommodation, convergence, and proximity on the pupillary diameter.
We recorded pupil size and vergence eye movements with the use of an infrared eye tracker. We determined the pupillary response in four conditions: (1) after a gaze shift from far to near without accommodation, (2) after a gaze shift from far to near with neither accommodation nor convergence, (3) after accommodation alone, and (4) after accommodation with convergence without a gaze shift to near. These responses were compared to the pupil response of a full near response and to a gaze shift from one far target to another.
We found a reliable pupillary near response. The removal of both accommodation and convergence in gaze shift from far to near abolished the pupillary near response. Accommodation alone did not induce pupillary constriction, while convergence and accommodation together induced a pupil response similar to the full near response.
The main trigger for the pupillary response seems to be convergence. Neither accommodation nor proximity alone induce a significant pupillary constriction. This suggests that the miosis of the near triad is closely coupled to the vergence system rather than being independently regulated.
KeywordsPupil Accommodation Convergence Near triad
MA was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (320030-147023).
Compliance with ethical standards
The Swiss National Science Foundation provided financial support to MA (Funding Number 320030-147023). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 11.Wilhelm H (2011) Chapter 16 - Disorders of the pupil. In: Leigh CK and RJ (ed) Handb. Clin. Neurol. Elsevier, pp 427–466Google Scholar
- 15.Renard G, Massonnet-Naux (1951) Pupillary synergy to convergence. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Générale Ophtalmol 11:137–145Google Scholar