Dark adaptation-induced changes in rod, cone and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) sensitivity differentially affect the pupil light response (PLR)
- 620 Downloads
Our purpose was to explore pupil light response (PLR) with respect to the change in sensitivity of photoreceptors during various dark adaptation phases and to determine the optimal duration of dark adaptation time before the PLR.
The PLR was recorded in 15 healthy subjects and three patients with neural or retinal vision loss after 1-sec blue and red light stimuli of 1, 10, and 100 cd/m2. The PLR was repeated nine times at different checkpoints during the 40-minute dark adaptation. The transient contraction amplitude, sustained contraction amplitude, and relative sustained contraction ratio of the PLR were analyzed.
The increase in the transient contraction amplitude during the entire dark adaptation process was significant (changing up to 45.1 %) in the initial phase of dark adaptation under different stimulus conditions. The changes in the sustained contraction amplitude and the relative sustained contraction ratio were substantial (changing up to 71.0 % and 37.2 % from 1 to 20 minutes of dark adaptation, respectively) under high-intensity blue illumination. The inflection point of the contraction curves in the dark adaptation was 15 or 20 minutes. The patients’ PLR results changed in a similar manner.
The changes in the sensitivity of different photoreceptors occurred at different rates, and the contraction amplitude of the PLR was significantly affected by the dark adaptation duration. So 20 minutes of dark adaptation before PLR testing was suggested to achieve a consistent and stable pupil response. The dark adaptation effect should be put into consideration when comparing the results from different phases of the PLR test.
KeywordsPupil light response (PLR) Pupil contraction Pupillometry Dark adaptation Monochromatic light Melanopsin Photoreceptors Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC)
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work; there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript .
- 4.Guler AD, Ecker JL, Lall GS, Haq S, Altimus CM, Liao HW, Barnard AR, Cahill H, Badea TC, Zhao H, Hankins MW, Berson DM, Lucas RJ, Yau KW, Hattar S (2008) Melanopsin cells are the principal conduits for rod-cone input to non-image-forming vision. Nature 453:102–105. doi: 10.1038/nature06829 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lorenz B, Strohmayr E, Zahn S, Friedburg C, Kramer M, Preising M, Stieger K (2012) Chromatic pupillometry dissects function of the three different light-sensitive retinal cell populations in RPE65 deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:5641–5652. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9974 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kjesbu SS, Moksnes K, Klepstad P, Knobel H, Kaasa S, Dale O (2005) Application of pupillometry and pupillary reactions in medical research. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke 125:29–32Google Scholar
- 13.Karachaliou F, Karavanaki K, Greenwood R, Baum JD (1997) Consistency of pupillary abnormality in children and adolescents with diabetes. Diabet Med 14:849–853. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(199710)14:10<849::aid-dia470>3.0.co;2-w CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Thamotharampillai K, Chan AK, Bennetts B, Craig ME, Cusumano J, Silink M, Oates PJ, Donaghue KC (2006) Decline in neurophysiological function after 7 years in an adolescent diabetic cohort and the role of aldose reductase gene polymorphisms. Diabetes Care 29:2053–2057. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0678 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yu M, Kautz MA, Thomas ML, Johnson D, Hotchkiss ER, Russo MB (2007) Operational implications of varying ambient light levels and time-of-day effects on saccadic velocity and pupillary light reflex. Ophthal Physiol Opt: J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opticians 27:130–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00450.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Lall GS, Revell VL, Momiji H, Al Enezi J, Altimus CM, Güler AD, Aguilar C, Cameron MA, Allender S, Hankins MW, Lucas RJ (2010) Distinct Contributions of Rod, Cone, and Melanopsin Photoreceptors to Encoding Irradiance. Neuron 66:417–428. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.037 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Feigl B, Zele AJ, Fader SM, Howes AN, Hughes CE, Jones KA, Jones R (2012) The post-illumination pupil response of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 90:e230–e234. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02226.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Dowling JE (1987) The retina: an approachable part of the brain. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rodieck RW, Rodieck RW (1998) The first steps in seeing. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar