Eye movements and reading in glaucoma: observations on patients with advanced visual field loss

  • Robyn Burton
  • Nicholas D. Smith
  • David P. CrabbEmail author



To investigate the relationship between reading speed and eye movements in patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects and age-similar visually healthy people.


Eighteen patients with advanced bilateral VF defects (mean age: 71, standard deviation [SD]: 7 years) and 39 controls (mean age: 67, SD: 8 years) had reading speed measured using short passages of text on a computer set-up incorporating eye tracking. Scanpaths were plotted and analysed from these experiments to derive measures of ‘perceptual span’ (total number of letters read per number of saccades) and ‘text saturation’ (the distance between the first and last fixation on lines of text). Another eye movement measure, termed ‘saccadic frequency’ (total number of saccades made to read a single word), was derived from a separate lexical decision task, where words were presented in isolation.


Significant linear association was demonstrated between perceptual span and reading speed in patients (R 2 = 0.42) and controls (R 2 = 0.56). Linear association between saccadic frequency during the LDT and reading speed was also found in patients (R 2 = 0.42), but not in controls (R 2 = 0.02). Patients also exhibited greater average text saturation than controls (P = 0.004).


Some, but not all, patients with advanced VF defects read slower than controls using short text passages. Differences in eye movement behaviour may partly account for this variability in patients. These patients were shown to saturate lines of text more during reading, which may explain previously-reported difficulties with sustained reading.


Glaucoma Reading Eye movements Visual fields Perimetry 



The authors thank the following: Ryo Asaoka for help with patient recruitment and ophthalmic examinations, Fiona Glen for testing participants and data collection, David Garway-Heath for comments on aspects of the experimental design, and Iván Marín-Franch for plotting scanpaths and some discussion about the manuscript.


This study was conducted as part of a programme of work funded by the Investigator-Initiated Studies Programme of Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd.

Conflict of interest

DPC has previously received unrestricted research funding from Allergan, Pfizer, Merck, and honoraria for lecturing from Allergan and Merck.


  1. 1.
    Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aspinall PA, Johnson ZK, Azuara-Blanco A, Montarzino A, Brice R, Vickers A (2008) Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:1907–1915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman EE, Muñoz B, West SK, Jampel HD, Friedman DS (2008) Glaucoma and quality of life: the Salisbury Eye evaluation. Ophthalmology 115:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramulu P (2009) Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:92–98PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF (2013) How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss. Ophthalmology 120:1120–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC (2006) Assessment of function related to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 13:67–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burton R, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Garway-Heath DF (2012) Glaucoma and reading: exploring the effects of contrast lowering of text. Optom Vis Sci 89:1282–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujita K, Yasuda N, Oda K, Yuzawa M (2006) Reading performance in patients with central visual field disturbance due to glaucoma. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 110:914–918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS (2009) Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye evaluation project. Arch Ophthalmol 127:82–87PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishii M, Seki M, Harigai R, Abe H, Fukuchi T (2013) Reading performance in patients with glaucoma evaluated using the MNREAD charts. Jpn J Ophthalmol 57:471–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Friedman DS, Rubin GS (2013) Difficulty with out-loud and silent reading in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:666–672PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McConkie GW, Rayner K (1975) The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 17:578–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin GS, Turano K (1994) Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vis Res 34:1723–1733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crossland MD, Rubin GS (2006) Eye movements and reading in macular disease: further support for the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis. Vis Res 46:590–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bullimore MA, Bailey IL (1995) Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 72:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM (2009) Staging glaucoma patient: why and how? Open Ophthalmol J 3:59–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC (2005) Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:210–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF (2011) Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7007–7011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32:221–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Husband HJ, Tarbuck AF (1994) Cognitive rating scales: a comparison of the mini-mental state examination and the Middlesex elderly assessment of mental state. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 9:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kutlay S, Kuçukdeveci AA, Elhan AH, Yavuzer G, Tennant A (2007) Validation of the Middlesex elderly assessment of mental state (MEAMS) as a cognitive screening test in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. Disabil Rehabil 29:315–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thorpe WG (1976) The Burt word reading test. The Scottish Council for Research in Education, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pollatsek A, Rayner K, Balota DA (1986) Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Percept Psychophys 40:123–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nicholson T (1991) Do children read words better in context or in lists? a classic study revisited. J Educ Psychol 83:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martin-Chang S, Levesque K (2013) Taken out of context: differential processing in contextual and isolated word reading. J Res Read 36:330–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Rubin GS (2013) Description and validation of a test to evaluate sustained silent reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:673–680PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    White JM, Bedell HE (1990) The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:1149–1161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS (2005) Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology 112:1579–1585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith ND, Crabb DP, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF (2012) Eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing images of everyday scenes. Seeing Perceiving 25:471–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smith ND, Glen FC, Crabb DP (2012) Eye movements during visual search in patients with glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 12:45PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glen FC, Smith ND, Crabb DP (2013) Saccadic eye movements and face recognition performance in patients with central glaucomatous visual field defects. Vis Res 82:42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lamirel C, Milea D, Cochereau I, Duong M-H, Lorenceau J (2012) Impaired saccadic Eye movement in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 23(1):23–32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31825c10dc CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Burton
    • 1
  • Nicholas D. Smith
    • 1
  • David P. Crabb
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Optometry and Visual ScienceCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations