Longitudinal change of refraction over at least 5 years in 15,000 patients

  • David GoldblumEmail author
  • Annette Brugger
  • Andreas Haselhoff
  • Stefanie Schmickler
Refractive Surgery



To report the natural, longitudinal history of shifts in refractive errors in different age groups in a large western European cohort over at least 5 years in the same patients.


The electronic database of a large regional clinic containing 225,000 patients was searched for records of patients with a follow-up of at least 5 years, excluding all patients who had received any surgical interventions in any eye. This search retrieved 15,799 patients aged 3 months to 79 years (median 37.8 years) with refractive follow up of at least 5 years (mean 8.8 years) and no surgical interventions. Differences in spherical equivalents (sum of sphere +1/2 cylinder) and cylinder between first and last visit in the same patients in only the right eye were calculated, and used as the measure of refractive shift. Subsequently differences in change between the right and left eye were also determined.


Refractions were found to be mostly stable from 25 to 39 years (n = 3,155 right eyes), with 50 % of these patients not changing their refraction. In patients aged 20–24 (n = 825 right eyes), only 39 % of the refractions remained stable, whereas 49 % experienced a myopic shift. In the age group 40–69 years (n = 6,694), 40–45 % remained stable, with an increase in hyperopic shifts. Eighty-five percent of all patients had bilateral symmetric shifts, and 61 % showed stable cylindrical values.


This report documents clinical relevant changes in spherical equivalents in all age groups within 5 to 10 years in the largest examined European cohort. Refractive surgery patients in particular should be selected accordingly, and be informed about the physiological changes which might still occur during their lifetime.


Refraction Progression Myopia Refractive surgery Ocular development 



We would like to thank Andreas Schoetzau (University Hospital Basel) and Anne Theissing (Augenärzte Gemeinschaftspraxis Ahaus-Gronau-Lingen) for their statistical support.

Financial disclosure

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Competing interests


Financial support



  1. 1.
    Lee KE, Klein BEK, Klein R, Wong TY (2002) Changes in refraction over 10 years in an adult population: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2566–2576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guzowski M, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Rose KA, Mitchell P (2003) Five-year refractive changes in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 110:1364–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gudmundsdottir E, Arnarsson A, Jonasson F (2005) Five-year refractive changes in an adult population: Reykjavik Eye Study. Ophthalmology 112(4):672–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu SY, Yoo YJ, Nemesure B, Hennis A, Leske MC (2005) Barbados Eye Studies Group. Nine-year refractive changes in the Barbados Eye Studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4032–4039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McBrien NA, Adams DW (1997) A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult-progression of myopia in an occupational group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:321–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jorge J, de Almeida JB, Parafita MA (2008) Binocular vision changes in university students: a 3-year longitudinal study. Optom Vis Sci 85:E999–E1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dirani M, Couper T, Yau J, Ang EK, Islam FM, Snibson GR, Vajpayee RB, Baird PN (2010) Long-term refractive outcomes and stability after excimer laser surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1709–1717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koshimizu J, Dhanuka R, Yamaguchi T (2010) Ten-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1817–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pietilä J, Mäkinen P, Pajari T, Suominen S, Keski-Nisula J, Sipilä K, Huhtala A, Uusitalo H (2004) Eight-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 20:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon RA, Donzis PB (1985) Refractive development of the human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 103:785–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mäntyjärvi MI (1985) Changes of refraction in schoolchildren. Arch Ophthalmol 103:790–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krantz EM, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Huang GH, Nieto FJ (2010) Measuring refraction in adults in epidemiological studies. Arch Ophthalmol 128:88–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Módis L Jr, Szalai E, Kolozsvári B, Németh G, Vajas A, Berta A (2012) Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography. Cornea 31:36–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fledelius HC (1981) The growth of the eye from the age of 10 to 18 years: a longitudinal study including ultrasound oculometry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 29:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Goldblum
    • 1
    Email author
  • Annette Brugger
    • 1
  • Andreas Haselhoff
    • 2
  • Stefanie Schmickler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity Hospital Basel, University BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Augenärzte Gemeinschaftspraxis Ahaus–Gronau–LingenAhausGermany

Personalised recommendations