Use of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review
- 691 Downloads
This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) versus a comparison group in the treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-associated macular edema, and explores its effects on visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT).
The authors searched the following databases: Medline (1950–October week 3, 2011), The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2011), EMBASE (up to 24 October 2011), and the TRIP Database (up to 24 October 2011), using no language or other limits. Trials that were included consisted of patients with BRVO-associated macular edema, those comparing a 1.25 mg IVB injection with a comparison group, those reporting both VA and CMT outcomes, and those having a minimum follow-up of 4 weeks.
In the four trials comparing IVB with a comparison group, IVB was effective in improving VA and CMT values in the long-term (12 weeks) in patients with BRVO-associated macular edema. Furthermore, statistically significant improvements in VA in the short-term (4 weeks) could also be seen.
Clinicians should use this review as an indicator that IVB is effective in improving VA and CMT values in the long-term in patients with BRVO-associated macular edema. It is important to note, however, that statistically significant improvements in VA in the short term could be seen. This review's main aim was to serve as an evidence base for potentially using other modalities, such as IVB, which seems to be reserved for certain cases.
KeywordsBevacizumab Macular edema Branch retinal vein occlusion
- 5.Moradian S, Faghihi H, Sadeghi B, Piri N, Ahmadieh H, Soheilian M, Dehghan MH, Azarmina M, Esfahani MR (2011) Intravitreal bevacizumab vs. sham treatment in acute branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema: results at 3 months (Report 1). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(2):193–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group (1984) Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 98(3):271–282Google Scholar
- 10.Noma H, Funatsu H, Yamasaki M, Tsukamoto H, Mimura T, Sone T, Hirayama T, Tamura H, Yamashita H, Minamoto A, Mishima HK (2008) Aqueous humour levels of cytokines are correlated to vitreous levels and severity of macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Eye 22(1):42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Higgins J, Green S (2006) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6: Section 6. The Cochrane Library 4Google Scholar
- 22.Network Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research, Scott IU, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Chan CK, Elman MJ, Friedman SM, Greven CM, Maturi RK, Pieramici DJ, Shami M, Singerman LJ, Stockdale CR (2007) A phase II randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 114(10):1860–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Soheilian M, Ramezani A, Obudi A, Bijanzadeh B, Salehipour M, Yaseri M, Ahmadieh H, Dehghan MH, Azarmina M, Moradian S, Peyman GA (2009) Randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 116(6):1142–1150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Yilmaz T, Weaver CD, Gallagher MJ, Cordero-Coma M, Cervantes-Castaneda RA, Klisovic D, Lavaque AJ, Larson RJ (2009). Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 116(5):902–911, quiz 912–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Sacu S, Pemp B, Weigert G, Matt G, Garhofer G, Pruente C, Schmetterer L, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2011) Response of retinal vessels and retrobulbar hemodynamics to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(6):3046–3050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Oosthuyse B, Moons L, Storkebaum E, Beck H, Nuyens D, Brusselmans K, Van Dorpe J, Hellings P, Gorselink M, Heymans S, Theilmeier G, Dewerchin M, Laudenbach V, Vermylen P, Raat H, Acker T, Vleminckx V, Van Den Bosch L, Cashman N, Fujisawa H, Drost MR, Sciot R, Bruyninckx F, Hicklin DJ, Ince C, Gressens P, Lupu F, Plate KH, Robberecht W, Herbert JM, Collen D, Carmeliet P (2001) Deletion of the hypoxia-response element in the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter causes motor neuron degeneration. Nat Genet 28(2):131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar