Comparison of techniques for measuring anterior chamber depth: Orbscan imaging, Smith’s technique, and van Herick’s method

Glaucoma

Abstract

Background

Evaluation of anterior chamber depth (ACD) can potentially identify those patients at risk of angle-closure glaucoma. We aimed to: compare van Herick’s limbal chamber depth (LCDvh) grades with LCDorb grades calculated from the Orbscan anterior chamber angle values; determine Smith’s technique ACD and compare to Orbscan ACD; and calculate a constant for Smith’s technique using Orbscan ACD.

Methods

Eighty participants free from eye disease underwent LCDvh grading, Smith’s technique ACD, and Orbscan anterior chamber angle and ACD measurement.

Results

LCDvh overestimated grades by a mean of 0.25 (coefficient of repeatability [CR] 1.59) compared to LCDorb. Smith’s technique (constant 1.40 and 1.31) overestimated ACD by a mean of 0.33 mm (CR 0.82) and 0.12 mm (CR 0.79) respectively, compared to Orbscan. Using linear regression, we determined a constant of 1.22 for Smith’s slit-length method.

Conclusions

Smith’s technique (constant 1.31) provided an ACD that is closer to that found with Orbscan compared to a constant of 1.40 or LCDvh. Our findings also suggest that Smith’s technique would produce values closer to that obtained with Orbscan by using a constant of 1.22.

Keywords

Anterior chamber depth Glaucoma Orbscan imaging Smith’s technique van Herick’s technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Lowe RF (1968) Time-amplitude ultrasonography for ocular biometry. Am J Ophthalmol 66:913–918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quigley H, Hung PT, Wang TH, Ho TC, Tielsch JM (1997) Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations. Ophthalmology 104:1489–1495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett BT, McGraw PV, Murray LA, Murgatroyd P (1996) Anterior chamber depth measurement in clinical practice. Optom Vis Sci 73:482–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith RJH (1979) A new method of estimating the depth of the anterior chamber. Br J Ophthalmol 63:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wishart PK, Batterbury M (1992) Ocular hypertension: correlation of anterior chamber angle width and risk of progression to glaucoma. Eye 6:248–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A (1969) Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol 68:626–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rabsilber TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU (2006) Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:456–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alsbirk PH (1986) Limbal and axial chamber depth variations. A population study in Eskimos. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 64:593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas R, George T, Braganza A, Muliyil J (1996) The flashlight test and van Herick’s test are poor predictors for occludable angles. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 24:251–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, Lee PS, Uranchimeg D, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J (2000) Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle-closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol 84:186–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Douthwaite WA, Spence D (1986) Slit-lamp measurement of the anterior chamber depth. Br J Ophthalmol 70:205–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boscia F, La Tegola MG, Alessio G, Sborgia C (2002) Accuracy of Orbscan optical pachymetry in corneas with haze. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C (2005) Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 82:892–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auffarth GU, Tetz MR, Biazid Y, Völcker HE (1997) Measuring anterior chamber depth with Orbscan topography system. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:1351–1355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koranyi G, Lydahl E, Norrby S, Taube M (2002) Anterior chamber depth measurement: a-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reddy AR, Pande MV, Finn P, El-Gogary H (2004) Comparative estimation of anterior chamber depth by ultrasonography, Orbscan IIz II, and IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1268–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Fotouhi A (2005) Anterior chamber depth measurement with a-scan ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci 82:900–904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Utine CA, Altin F, Cakir H, Perente I (2009) Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 87:386–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Frisch IB, Auffarth GU (2003) Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II Topography System. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2115–2121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabsilber TM, Becker KA, Auffarth GU (2005) Reliability of Orbscan II topography measurements in relation to refractive status. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:1607–1613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osuobeni EP, Oduwaiye KA, Ogbuehi KC (2000) Intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer agreement of the Smith method of measuring the anterior chamber depth. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 20:153–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Allouch C, Touzeau O, Borderie V, Puech M, Ameline B, Scheer S, Laroche L (2002) Orbscan IIz: a new device for iridocorneal angle measurement. J Fr Ophtalmol 25:799–806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fisch BM (1993) Gonisocopy and the glaucomas. Butterworth-Heinemann, StonehamGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kashiwagi K, Tokunaga T, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Tsukahara S (2005) Agreement between peripheral anterior chamber depth evaluation using the van Herick technique and angle width evaluation using the Shaffer system in Japanese. Jpn J Ophthalmol 49:134–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ophthalmic Research Group, School of Life and Health SciencesAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations