Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review
- 546 Downloads
This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of preschool vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors.
The literature searches were conducted in nine bibliographic databases. No limitation to a specific study design, year of publication or language was applied. Studies were included if they compared a vision screening test with a reference test (gold standard) in children from the general population. In addition, the studies had to provide sufficient data to calculate diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity). Full-text articles were assessed for studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria using the “Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)” checklist.
Two studies with a longitudinal design and 25 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria. One of the longitudinal studies compared a screening programme in children between 1 and 2 years of age with a re-examination at the age of 8. The sensitivity for the screening programme was 86% (range: 64–97%) and the specificity 99% (range: 98–99%). The second longitudinal study compared screening examinations at 8, 12, 18, 25 and 31 months, with a re-examination at the age of 37 months. In this study, the sensitivity of the screening examination increased with age, while the specificity remained unchanged. The cross-sectional studies evaluated different screening settings, visual acuity tests, auto- or photorefractors and stereo tests. A large variety of reference tests, differing criteria for defining amblyopia and its risk factors and methodological limitations of the studies prevented a valid data interpretation.
Diagnostic test accuracy of preschool vision screening tests can only be sufficiently investigated after establishing age-related values defining amblyopia, refractive errors and binocular disorders. To address these questions, we recommend a controlled longitudinal study design.
KeywordsSystematic review Amblyopia Preschool vision screening Diagnostic test accuracy
- 8.American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (1991) Eye care for the children of America. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:64–67Google Scholar
- 14.UK National Screening Committee (2003) Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. Available at http://www.nsc.nhs.uk/pdfs/criteria.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2009
- 15.Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:3–25Google Scholar
- 31.Carl H (1994) Vergleichende ophthalmologische Untersuchungen von Vorschulkindern im Hinblick auf Reihenuntersuchungen mit dem C-Test (nach Hohmann und Haase). Hamburg (Univ): DissertationGoogle Scholar
- 39.Ehrt O (2001) Refraktionsscreening bei Säuglingen und Kleinkindern. Z prakt Augenheilkd 22:299–304Google Scholar
- 46.Powell C, Hatt SR (2005) Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3: Art.No.:CD005020. doi :10.1002/14651858.CD005020.pub2
- 47.Carlton J, Czoski-Murray C, Smith KJ, Marr J (2008) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4–5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 12 (25)Google Scholar
- 49.Agence nationale d’accrédidation et d’évaluation en santé (ANAES) (2002) Early vision screening in children to prevent amblyopia. Available at http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/VV_Mai03-Amblyopie_ENG.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2009
- 50.Oliva G, Almazan D, Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research (CAHTA) (1997) Analysis of the MTI Photoscreener for the early detection of visual anomalies in children. Available at http://www.library.nhs.uk/ChildHealth/ViewResource.aspx?resID=251918. Accessed May 20, 2009