Accommodative function in school children with reading difficulties

Pediatrics

Abstract

Background

Prior findings suggest correlation between reading problems and accommodative function, but few studies have assessed accommodation in children with poor reading skills. Our aim was to characterize monocular accommodative amplitude, relative accommodation and binocular accommodative facility in a population of healthy, non-dyslexic primary school children with reading difficulties.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study on 87 poor readers and 32 control children (all between 8 and 13 years of age) in grades three to six recruited from 11 elementary schools in Madrid, Spain. In each subject with best spectacle correction, negative relative accommodation (NRA) and positive relative accommodation (PRA) were measured using a phoropter, monocular accommodative amplitude (MAA) was determined using the minus lenses method, and binocular accommodative facility (BAF) was measured using the Bernell Acuity Suppression Slide (VO/9) and a ± 2.00 D accommodative demand for a period of 1 minute.

Results

Monocular accommodative amplitude was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the group of poor readers (right eye 9.1 D ± 2.3, left eye 9.0 D ± 2.3) than in the control group (right eye 10.5 D ± 1.7, left eye 10.5 D ± 1.7). Binocular accommodative facility values were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the poor readers (4.9 cpm ± 3.1) than controls (6.3 cpm ± 2.9). Negative and positive relative accommodation values were similar in both groups of children.

Conclusions

This study provides data on the accommodative capacity of a population of children with reading difficulties. Our findings suggest a reduced monocular accommodative amplitude and binocular accommodative facility, such that this function should be assessed by an optometric clinician in children whose reading level is below average.

Keywords

Accommodative function Poor readers School-age children Monocular accommodative amplitude Relative accommodation Binocular accommodative facility 

References

  1. 1.
    Flax N (1970) The contribution of visual problems to learning disability. J Am Optom Assoc 41:841–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sucher D, Stewart J (1993) Vertical fixation disparity in learning disabled. Optom Vis Sci 70:1038–1043, doi:10.1097/00006324–199312000–00008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjöström A (2006) Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26:148–155, doi:10.1111/j.1475–1313.2006.00364.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans BJW (1998) The underachieving child. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18:153–159, doi:10.1016/S0275–5408(97)00068–9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans BJW, Patel R, Wilkins AJ, Lightstone A, Eperjesi F, Speedwell L et al (1999) A review of the management of 323 consecutive patients seen in a specific learning difficulties clinic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:454–466, doi:10.1046/j.1475–1313.1999.00465.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hennessey D, Iosue RA, Rouse MW (1984) Relation of symptoms to accommodative infacility of school-aged children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 61:177–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kulp M, Schmidt P (1996) Visual predictors of reading performance in kindergarten and first grade children. Optom Vis Sci 73:255–262, doi:10.1097/00006324–199604000–00007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman L (1980) Incidence of vision dificulties in children with learning disabilities. J Am Optom Assoc 51:447–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helveston E, Weber J, Miller K, Robertson K, Hohberger G, Estes R et al (1985) Visual function and academic performance. Am J Ophthalmol 99:346–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blika S (1982) Ophthalmological findings in pupils of a primary school with particular reference to reading difficulties. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiely P, Crewther S, Crewther D (2001) Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read? Clin Exp Optom 84:346–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kedzia B, Tondel G, Pieczyrak D, Maples WC (1999) Accommodative facility test results and academic success in Polish second graders. J Am Optom Assoc 70:110–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latvala M, Korhonen T, Penttinen M, Laippala P (1994) Ophthalmic findings in dyslexic schoolchildren. Br J Ophthalmol 78:339–343, doi:10.1136/bjo.78.5.339 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hofstetter H (1944) A comparison of Duane’s and Donders tables of the amplitude of accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 21:345–363Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duane A (1912) Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. J Am Med Assoc 59:1010–1013Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kragha I (1986) Amplitude of accommodation:population and methodological differences. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 6:75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjöström A (2004) The amplitude of accommodation in 6– to 10-year-old children - not as good as expected!. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 24:246–251, doi:10.1111/j.1475–1313.2004.00201.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jimenez R, Gonzalez MD, Perez MA, García JA (2003) Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23:97–107, doi:10.1046/j.1475–1313.2003.00093.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackson TW, Goss D (1991) Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. J Am Optom Assoc 62:857–866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goss D, Zhai H (1994) Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. Doc Ophthalmol 86:349–380, doi:10.1007/BF01204595 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scheiman M, Herzberg H, Frantz K, Margolies M (1988) Normative study of accommodative facility in elementary schoolchildren. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:127–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burge S (1979) Supression during binocular accommodative rock. Opt Mon 79:867–872Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Motsch S, Mühlendyck H (2000) Frequency of reading disability caused by ocular problems in 9- and 10-year-old children in a small town. Strabismus 8:283–285, doi:10.1076/stra.8.4.283.689 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans B, Drasdo N, Richards I (1994) Investigation of accommodative and binocular function in dyslexia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14:5–19, doi:10.1111/j.1475–1313.1994.tb00550.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cuetos F, Rodriguez B, Ruano E (2000). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC (Madrid)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramos J, Cuetos F (1999). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC-SE (Madrid)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scheiman M, Rouse M (1994) Optometric management of learning-related vision problems. Mosby, St. Louis Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scheiman M, Wick B (1994) Clinical management of binocular vision: Heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders. J.B. Lippincott Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zellers JA, Alpert TL, Rouse MW (1984) A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Assoc 55:31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gwiazda J, Thom F, Bauer J, Held R (1993) Myopic children show insufficient accommodation response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:690–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cacho P, García A, Lara F, Seguí MM (2002) Diagnostic signs of accommodative insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci 79:614–620, doi:10.1097/00006324–200209000–00013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borsting E, Rouse MW, Deland PN, Hovett S, Kimura D, Park M et al (2003) Association of symptoms and convergence and accommodative insufficiency in school-age children. Optometry 74:25–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abdi S, Brautaset R, Rydberg A, Pansell T (2007) The influence of accommodative insufficiency on reading. Clin Exp Optom 90:36–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of OptometryComplutense UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.E.U.O. Universidad ComplutenseMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations