Structure of intracorneal femtosecond laser pulse effects in conical incision profiles

Refractive Surgery



As the applicative potential of femtosecond lasers is to be extended from LASIK-flap creation into intrastromal ablation uses, the interdependency of influencing factors has to be understood. We therefore evaluated the relationship between focus depth, energy level, spatial distribution and morphology of fs-Laser pulse effects at a given repetition rate in corneal tissue.


The experimental study included five porcine corneae obtained from slaughterhouse pigs. Using a prototype of a femtosecond laser (FEMTEC; 20/10 Perfect Vision AG, Heidelberg, Germany), a conical circular cut was performed in posterior-anterior direction through the entire corneal profile. The laser energy applied ranged from 4.0 to 8.5 μJ. Histological sections (n = 337) of a thickness of 7 μm were obtained, stained with hematoxylin/eosin, and morphometrically evaluated.


The intrastromal femtosecond laser effects were aligned throughout the corneal stroma in a line that followed the dissection line programmed for the laser. The lesions were mostly of roughly elliptic shape with a fine dense lining at the inner wall, without evidence of a collateral damage beyond the disruption cavity. The mean maximal diameter of the intrastromal laser effects was 34.2 ± 18.6 μm (range: 9–120 μm), and the mean maximal lesion diameter was 60.8 ± 42.6 μm. In multivariate analysis, the lesion type (single shot cavity, partly confluent lesions, and fully confluent lesions) was significantly associated with the laser energy applied (P = 0.027) and the lesion diameter (P = 0.01).


At higher laser energies, the intrastromal laser lesions were larger and more confluent, suggesting that, with the prototype of femtosecond laser used, a higher laser energy may lead to more confluent intrastromal laser effects. It may facilitate the complete cutting of the corneal tissue with the laser. Neither discernable debris nor stainable collateral damage were detected, suggesting a purely mechanical action of the laser.


Femtosecond laser Cornea Keratoplasty Trephination 


  1. 1.
    Loesel FH, Niemz MH, Bille JF, Juhasz T (1996) Laser-induced optical breakdown on hard and soft tissues and itsdependence on the pulse duration: experiment and model. IEEE J Quantum Electron 32(10):1717–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zohdy MJ, Tse C, Ye JY, O’Donnell M (2006) Acoustic estimation of thermal distribution in the vicinity of femtosecond laser-induced optical breakdown. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(11):2347–2355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binder PS (2006) One thousand consecutive intraLase laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(6):962–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Price FW Jr, Price MO (2008) Femtosecond laser shaped penetrating keratoplasty: one-year results utilizing a top-hat configuration. Am J Ophthalmol 145(2):210–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonas JB, Vossmerbaeumer U (2004) Femtosecond laser penetrating keratoplasty with conical incisions and positional spikes. J Refract Surg 20(4):397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurtz RM, Liu X, Elner VM, Squier JA, Du D, Mourou GA (1997) Photodisruption in the human cornea as a function of laser pulse width. J Refract Surg 13(7):653–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Juhasz T, Kastis GA, Suarez C, Bor Z, Bron WE (1996) Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water. Lasers Surg Med 19(1):23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang BG, Riemann I, Schubert H, Schweitzer D, König K, Halbhuber KJ (2007) Multiphoton microscopy for monitoring intratissue femtosecond laser surgery effects. Lasers Surg Med 39(6):527–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meltendorf C, Burbach GJ, Bühren J, Bug R, Ohrloff C, Deller T (2007) Corneal femtosecond laser keratotomy results in isolated stromal injury and favorable wound-healing response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(5):2068–2075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun H, Han M, Niemz MH, Bille JF (2007) Femtosecond laser corneal ablation threshold: dependence on tissue depth and laser pulse width. Lasers Surg Med 39:654–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Binder PS, Tran DB (2007) Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes. Cornea 26(4):446–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyMedical Faculty Mannheim of the Ruprecht-Karls-UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology/Universitaets-Augenklinik, Mannheim Medical FacultyUniversity of HeidelbergMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations