Advertisement

Nonmydriatic screening for diabetic retinopathy by ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap)

  • Aljoscha S. Neubauer
  • Marcus Kernt
  • Christos Haritoglou
  • Siegfried G. Priglinger
  • Anselm Kampik
  • Michael W. Ulbig
Retinal Disorders

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic properties of a nonmydriatic 200° ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) versus onsite mydriatic ophthalmologic examination for diabetic retinopathy.

Methods

A consecutive series of 51 eyes of 51 patients with different levels of diabetic retinopathy (DR) was examined. Grading of diabetic retinopathy and macular edema obtained on stereoscopic dilated funduscopy by a retina specialist was compared against grading obtained from Optomap Panoramic200 SLO images. All SLOs were performed with an undilated pupil, and no additional clinical information was used for evaluation of the Optomap images by three independent, masked expert graders.

Results

A total of five images (9.8%) were not gradable due to insufficient quality. Clinically 4 eyes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), while 9 had none, 5 mild, 19 moderate and 14 severe nonproliferative diseases (NPDR). Of the gradable 46 images, a clinically significant macular edema (CSME) was present in 28 eyes clinically. On Optomap, all eyes with PDR were detected as being proliferative, and a sensitivity of 94% at a specificity of 100% was obtained for all graders to detect more than mild DR. Agreement between Optomap retinopathy grading and clinical assessment was good with unweighted kappas of 0.68, 0.68 and 0.51. Assessment of CSME yielded sensitivities of 93, 93 and 89% at specificities of 89, 72 and 83%.

Conclusions

The Optomap Panoramic200 nonmydriatic images are of sufficient quality to assess DR and CSME validly and therefore fulfill the basic requirements for telescreening programs.

Keywords

Retinopathy screening Retinal screening Telemedicine Imaging Diabetes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. S. Guthmann and Mrs. N. Ehsani for expert technical assistance with Optomap imaging.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed J, Ward TP, Bursell SE, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Vigersky RA (2006) The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 29:2205–2209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) (2002) International clinical diabetic retinopathy severity scale. http://www.aao.org/education/statements/recommendations/international_dr.cfm
  3. 3.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chou B (2003) Limitations of the Panoramic 200 Optomap. Optom Vis Sci 80:671–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiCarlo CD, Roach WP, Gagliano DA, Boppart SA, Hammer DX, Cox AB, Fujimoto JG (1999) Comparison of optical coherence tomography imaging of cataracts with histopathology. J Biomed Opt 4:450–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EDTRS (1985) Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1796–1806Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fong DS, Aiello L, Gardner TW, King GL, Blankenship G, Cavallerano JD, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein R (2004) Retinopathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(Suppl 1):S84–S87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hulme SA, Tin UA, Hardy KJ, Joyce PW (2002) Evaluation of a district-wide screening programme for diabetic retinopathy utilizing trained optometrists using slit-lamp and Volk lenses. Diabet Med 19:741–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones WL (2004) Limitations of the Panoramic 200 Optomap. Optom Vis Sci 81:165–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kempen JH, O’Colmain BJ, Leske MC, Haffner SM, Klein R, Moss SE, Taylor HR, Hamman RF (2004) The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122:552–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keng PC, Lee AC, Cox AB, Bergtold DS, Lett JT (1982) Effects of heavy ions on rabbit tissues: cataractogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 41:127–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirkpatrick JN, Manivannan A, Gupta AK, Hipwell J, Forrester JV, Sharp PF (1995) Fundus imaging in patients with cataract: role for a variable wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol 79:892–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE (1984) Visual impairment in diabetes. Ophthalmology 91:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manivannan A, Plskova J, Farrow A, McKay S, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (2005) Ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography of the ocular fundus. Am J Ophthalmol 140:525–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neubauer AS, Yu A, Haritoglou C, Ulbig MW (2005) Peripheral retinal changes in acute retinal necrosis imaged by ultra widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:758–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Owens DR, Dolben J, Young S, Ryder RE, Jones I, Vora J, Jones D, Morsman D, Hayes TM (1991) Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 8:S4–S10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scanlon PH, Foy C, Malhotra R, Aldington SJ (2005) The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care 28:2448–2453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stefansson E, Bek T, Porta M, Larsen N, Kristinsson JK, Agardh E (2000) Screening and prevention of diabetic blindness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:374–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM (2001) Two-field photography can identify patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy: a screening approach in the primary care setting. Diabetes Care 24:2086–2090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    von Wendt G, Ronnholm P, Heikkila K, Summanen P (2000) A comparison between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aljoscha S. Neubauer
    • 1
  • Marcus Kernt
    • 1
  • Christos Haritoglou
    • 1
  • Siegfried G. Priglinger
    • 1
  • Anselm Kampik
    • 1
  • Michael W. Ulbig
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations