The Brückner test: extended distance improves sensitivity for ametropia




The Brückner test is usually performed at a distance of 1 m. Due to optical reasons, the test should detect ametropia more sensitively at an extended distance. We compared the sensitivity of the test to detect unilateral ametropia at a distance of 4 m versus the traditional distance of 1 m.

Patients and methods

In this study, five blinded experienced observers (experts) performed the Brückner transillumination test on five emmetropic subjects (age 22.3 +/− 2.3 years) at a distance of 1 m which was then extended up to 4 m. Unilateral ametropia was simulated by both spherical and cylindrical lenses of −1, −2, −3, −4, and +1, +2, +3, +4 diopters in front of one eye and a plano lens in front of the other eye in a randomised order. Controls with plano lenses in front of both eyes were interspersed. The test was considered positive in case of any difference between the red reflexes of both eyes. For spherical ametropia, the procedure was repeated with 25 medical students who examined one subject each.


At a distance of 1 m, unilateral myopia/hypermetropia of more than 1 diopter was detected in 78.7%/71.3% by experts and in 34.7%/53.3% by students. At 4 m, detection rates increased to 99.3%/96.0% and 98.7%/100% respectively. Rates of false positive findings for experts vs students were 3.1% vs 1.5% at 1 m and 4.0% vs 3.0% at 4 m. For unilateral astigmatism, experts’ detection rates were similar at 1 m (64.7%/70.0%) and lower at 4 m (91.7%/90.3%), depending on the astigmatism axis.


The sensitivity of the Brückner reflex for anisometropia improves by extension of the examination distance, especially in the hands of less experienced observers. To detect ametropia more sensitively, a test distance of 4 m is recommended.


Amblyopia Anisometropia Brückner test Vision screening 


  1. 1.
    Ehrlich MI, Reinecke RD, Simons K (1983) Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus. Programs, methods guidelines. Surv Ophthalmol 28:145–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flynn JT (1991) Amblyopia revisited. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:183–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tychsen L (1992) Binocular vision. In: Hart WM Jr (ed) Adler’s physiology of the eye: clinical application. Mosby Yearbook, St Louis, pp 837–838Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paysse EA, Williams GC, Coats DK, Williams EA (2001) Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener. Pediatrics 108:E74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coats D, Jenkins R (1997) Vision assessment of the pediatric patient. Refinements, American Academy of Ophthalmology 1:1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donahue SP (2006) Relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 142:132–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillis A, Flynn JT, Hawkins BS (1983) The evolving concept of amblyopia: a challenge to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol 118:192–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brückner R (1962) Exakte Strabismusdiagnostik bei 1/2- bis 3jährigen Kindern mit einem einfachen Verfahren, dem “Durchleuchtungstest”. Ophthalmologica 144:184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brückner R (1965) Praktische Übungen mit dem Durchleuchtungstest zur Frühdiagnose des Strabismus. Ophthalmologica 149:497–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tongue AC, Cibis GW (1981) Brückner test. Ophthalmology 88:1041–1044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffin JA, Cotter SA (1986) The Brückner test: evaluation of clinical usefulness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:957–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Archer SM (1988) Developmental aspects of the Brückner test. Ophthalmology 95:1096–1101Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roe LD, Guyton DL (1984) The light that leaks: Brückner and the red reflex. Surv Ophthalmol 28:655–670Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Mosby, St Louis, p 187Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hald A (1952) Statistical theory with engineering applications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gole GM, Douglas LM (1995) Validity of the Brückner reflex in the detection of amblyopia. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 23:281–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations