Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membranectomy for refractory diabetic macular edema without a taut posterior hyaloid

  • Brett J. Rosenblatt
  • Gaurav K. Shah
  • Sanjay Sharma
  • Jeff Bakal
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Background

This is a retrospective study designed to investigate the effect of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on diabetic macular edema in eyes that do not have a taut hyaloid and have been refractory to standard laser treatment.

Methods

Review of 26 eyes of 20 patients consecutively were treated with PPV with ILM peel for refractory diabetic macular edema. Eyes were included if they had been unresponsive to conventional treatment defined as at least two focal laser applications by a retina specialist. Paired t-testing was performed to determine if a change in both optical coherence tomography (OCT)—measured retinal thickness and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity occurred prior to and following PPV with epiretinal membrane vitrectomy. In addition, we performed multivariate regression analysis to determine if any clinical variables predicted a change in visual acuity.

Results

The mean age in the sample was 65 years (range 29–81 years). The mean follow-up time was 242 days (range 35–939). Sixteen of the 26 eyes were phakic and the remaining ten were pseudophakic. There was a statistically significant improvement of mean visual acuity from a preoperative logMAR vision of 1.0 to a best postoperative vision of 0.75 (p=0.016, paired t-test). Thirteen (50%) of the 26 eyes gained at least two lines of best-corrected Snellen acuity, three (11.5%) had a decline of at least two lines, and ten (38.5%) showed stable visual acuity. Regression analysis demonstrated that baseline worse visual acuity was the only clinical variable that was associated with improvement in visual acuity (beta=0.602, p=0.016; R2=28.7). Fourteen eyes had preoperative and postoperative OCT. Thirteen eyes (93%) had a significant decrease in foveal thickness; with an average preoperative thickness of 575 μm compared to a postoperative average of 311 μm (t=3.65, p=0.002). No surgical complications were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Surgery for refractory diabetic edema without a taut hyaloid is associated with a significant improvement in visual acuity and diminution of retinal thickness as measured by OCT. Further investigations are warranted to define the role of surgery in the management of persistent diabetic macular edema.

References

  1. 1.
    Blankenship GW (1979) Diabetic macular edema and argon laser photocoagulation: a prospective randomized study. Ophthalmology 86(1):69–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW et al (2000) Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 20(2):126–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harbour JW, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW et al (1996) Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema associated with a thickened and taut posterior hyaloid membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 121(4):405–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ikeda T, Sato K, Katano T, Hayashi Y (2000) Improved visual acuity following pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic cystoid macular edema and detached posterior hyaloid. Retina 20(2):220–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Sofker A et al (2003) Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 121:57–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kampik A, Green WR, Michels RG et al (1980) Ultrastructural features of progressive idiopathic epiretinal membrane removed by vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 90(6):797–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ladas ID, Theodossiadis GP (1993) Long-term effectiveness of modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic maculare dema. Acta Ophthalmol 71(3):393–397Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    La Heij EC, Hendrikse F, Kessels AG, Derhaag PJ (2001) Vitrectomy results in diabetic macular edema without evident vitreomacular traction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239(4):264–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis H, Abrams GW, Blumenkranz MS, Campo RV (1992) Vitrectomy for diabetic macular traction and edema associated with posterior hyaloidal traction. Ophthalmology 99(5):753–759PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martidis A, Duker JS, Greenberg PB et al (2002) Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 109(5):920–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Massin P, Duguid G, Erginay A et al (2003) Optical coherence tomography for evaluating diabetic macular edema before and after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 135(2):169–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonald HR, Schatz H (1985) Grid photocoagulation for diffuse macular edema. Retina 5(2):65–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Micelli Ferrari T, Cardascia N, Durante G et al (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy in diabetic macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol 97(3–4):471–474Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nasrallah FP, Jalkh AE, Van Coppenolle F et al (1988) The role of the vitreous in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 95(10):1335–1339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nelson ML, Tennant MT, Sivalingam A, Regillo C, Belmont JB, Martidis A (2003) Infectious and presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Retina 23(5):686–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olk RJ (1986) Modified grid argon (blue–green) laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 93(7):938–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otani T, Kishi S (2000) Tomographic assessment of vitreous surgery for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 129(4):487–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J et al (2003) Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology 110:62–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pendergast SD, Hassan TS, Williams GA et al (2000) Vitrectomy for diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with a taut premacular posterior hyaloid. Am J Ophthalmol 130(2):178–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tachi N, Ogino N (1996) Vitrectomy for diffuse macular edema in cases of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 122(2):258–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group (1985) Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report number 1. Ophthalmology 103(12):1796–1806Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamamoto T, Akabane N, Takeuchi S (2001) Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: the role of posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane. 132(3):369–377Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brett J. Rosenblatt
    • 1
  • Gaurav K. Shah
    • 2
  • Sanjay Sharma
    • 3
  • Jeff Bakal
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesWashington School of MedicineSt LouisUSA
  2. 2.Barnes Retina InstituteWashington School of MedicineSt LouisUSA
  3. 3.Cost Effective Ocular Health Policy UnitQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations