Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use

  • Torsten Schlote
  • Gregor Kadner
  • Nora Freudenthaler
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the spontaneous eye-blink rate (SEBR) and blinking pattern in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal (VDT) use.

Methods

The SEBR of 30 patients with dry eye syndrome (median age 44.8 years, range 18 – 67 years) was measured using a computer-based video analysis system. Only complete eye blinks were recorded during 10 min of conversation, during initial VDT use and again after a preceding work period of 30 min.

Results

In comparison with SEBR during conversation (mean value 16.8 blinks/min, standard deviation 16.8 blinks/min) the SEBR significantly decreased during initial VDT use (6.6±4.8; P<0.001) and remained significantly decreased during re-measurement after 30 min (5.9±4.6; P<0.001). SEBR was not significantly different between initial VDT use and re-measurement after 30 min (P=0.65). The SEBR was characterized by marked interindividual variability during conversation and VDT use. No significant correlation was found between SEBR (either during conversation or during VDT use), and the quality (tear break-up time) or quantity (Schirmer I test, Jones test) of the tear film. Typical blinking patterns were found to be (1) a relatively time-independent, irregular pattern, (2) an initial phase of 2–4 min with shorter inter-eye-blink intervals, and (3) alternating periods of higher and lower inter-eye-blink intervals.

Conclusions

Reduction of the SEBR during VDT use is primarily determined by marked visual attention, resulting in an exacerbation of dry eye symptoms in predisposed humans. High interindividual variability and distinct patterns of eye blinking may be key factors in further clarification of VDT–eye interactions and develop individually designed solutions to prevent desiccation during VDT use.

References

  1. 1.
    Acosta MC, Gallar J, Belmonte C (1999) The influence of eye solutions on blinking and ocular comfort at rest and during work at video display terminals. Exp Eye Res 68: 663–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bron AJ (2001) Diagnosis of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol 45 [Suppl 2]: S221–S226Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carney LG, Hill RM (1982) The nature of normal blinking patterns. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 60: 427–433Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dain SJ, McCarthy AK, Chan-Ling T (1988) Symptoms in VDU operators. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65: 162–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doughty MJ (2001) Consideration of three types of spontaneous eyeblink activity in normal humans: during reading and video display terminal use, in primary gaze, and while in conversation. Optom Vis Sci 78: 712–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freudenthaler N, Neuf H, Kadner G, Schlote T (2003) Characteristics of spontaneous eyeblink activity during video display terminal use in healthy volunteers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241: 914–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Fukui Y, Hamano T, Ri M, Araki K, Horimoto K, Takamura E, Kitagawa K, Oyama M (1995) Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233: 555–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 .
    Jones LT (1966) The lacrimal secretory system and its treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 62: 47–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakamori K, Odawara BS, Nakajimia T, Mizutani T, Tsubota K (1997) Blinking is controlled primarily by ocular surface conditions. Am J Ophthalmol 124: 24–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L, Galloway B (1991) Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci 68: 888–892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prause JU, Norn M (1987) Relation between blink frequency and break-up time. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 65: 19–22Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rolando M, Zierhut M (2001) The ocular surface and tear film and their dysfunction in dry eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol 45 [Suppl 2]: S203–210Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salibello C, Nilsen E (1995) Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis. J Am Optom Assoc 66: 479-483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schirmer O (1903) Studien zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Tränenabsonderung und Tränenabfuhr. Albrecht v Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 56: 197–291Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (1999) Results of a population-based questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye. Cornea 18: 408–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomson WD (1998) Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18: 111–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toda I, Fujishima H, Tsubota K (1993) Ocular fatigue is the major symptom of dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol 71: 347–352Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsubota K, Nakamori K (1993) Dry eyes and video display terminals. New Engl J Med 328: 584Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsubota K, Nakamori K (1995) Effects of ocular surface area and blink rate on tear dynamics. Arch Ophthalmol 113: 155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsubota K, Hata S, Okusawa Y, Egami F, Ohtsuki T, Nakamori K (1996) Quantitative videographic analysis of blinking in normal subjects and patients with dry eye. Arch Ophthalmol 114: 715–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yap M (1991) Tear-break-up time is related to blink frequency. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 69: 92–94Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaman ML, Doughty MJ, Button NF (1998) The exposed ocular surface and its relationship to spontaneous eyeblink rate in elderly caucasians. Exp Eye Res 67: 681–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torsten Schlote
    • 1
  • Gregor Kadner
    • 1
  • Nora Freudenthaler
    • 1
  1. 1.University Eye HospitalTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations